Lol well I just have to get my fiancee in as an American citizen selling political asylum then
Canada won't have us, sorry. I understand that Vancouver has a decent climate relative to other places, but at the rate Trump is alienating the universe (except for Kim of course) I don't know how long we'll be allowed entry. I'm half kidding.
...and NK will have bought themselves another year or two to get a deployable weapon ready.
Kim won a huge boost to his legitimacy at home just by this meeting happening. No matter what he gets at least that out of this.
What part of "We can resume joint exercises at any time" do you fail to comprehend?
Doing so would be a dramatic statement of disapproval of developments in the DPRK.
The whole episode here is highly contrived on the part of Trump, a faux crisis with a faux resolution, at least so far. The notion that the DPRK poses a threat to this country rather than to the ROK is absurd from the get-go.
I can't even imagine what the ROK govt thinks about the way Trump is dissing them.
So the same could be said of the Iranians with the Obama deal? After all both are about curbing nuclear winter.
If you believe the ultimate end is a nuclear war, then what is it you want from people today?
I'm assuming your choice of action is a United States first strike / invasion of North Korea.
So the same could be said of the Iranians with the Obama deal? After all both are about curbing nuclear winter.
So the same could be said of the Iranians with the Obama deal? After all both are about curbing nuclear winter.
Lol well I just have to get my fiancee in as an American citizen selling political asylum then
I am not sure what the solution is. But NK's goal is not nuclear war. The goal is to have the power to be untouchable. Once he can field a credible nuclear threat he can in essence use it to blackmail the rest of the world. He gets to join the MAD club and basically no longer worry about other countries interfering with how he runs his country. He can all but ignore most sanctions. He can run blockades with the threat of nuclear retaliation for attacking his ships.
I honestly don't know how to stop them. I'm just pointing out that this is a pattern they have been repeating for several decades now and I see no reason that this is not the same play they have made every time. How often are we going to fall for the same ploy?
It really depends on your marketability. Canada won't just take anyone in but if either have skills in demand then you might get in. My daughter could as an educator in some locations and then citizenship would be easier for her. I have to be a sex worker to get in NZ right now, and believe me no one is going to pay me for that
Yeah sex workers are being added to the "in demand" list.
NZ must be getting more wealthy. They don't HAVE to fuck sheep anymore!
South Korea gets the rug pulled out from under them
Not even close.
Iran is a fully recognized state, North Korea isn't even a member of the UN. Do you know the difference?
Iran was a multi party negotiation so calling it "the Obama deal" is misleading at best. The Iran deal also did not involve a face to face summit with the leader of Iran and the sitting US President The two processes are not even remotely the same.
Not to suggest you're doing this, but don't think it's really fair to criticize any world leader for seeking nuclear weapons when the US has consistently attacked and destroyed nations without those weapons, while nations that have them survive.
https://www.voanews.com/a/south-koreans-hopeful-peace-will-prevail-trump-kim-summit/4433140.html
No one in South Korea seems to give a shit about military exercises.
It wasn't that much of an issue until the turn if the century or so. NK wanted nukes because it wanted nukes. There was no realistic expectation that anyone would attack them. I mean why? SK was OK and NK had nothing anyone wanted. It's the nuke problem that bit them in the ass. The rest of the world? Trump has turned on allies and talks about Canadians suffering because he didn't like how Trudeau spoke to him. The Master must not be challenged. Heh, I'm seeing Trump as Robert Delgado right now.
Not to suggest you're doing this, but don't think it's really fair to criticize any world leader for seeking nuclear weapons when the US has consistently attacked and destroyed nations without those weapons, while nations that have them survive.
I like it when someone makes it stark and obvious that they have no grasp of what's going on or how things work.So the same could be said of the Iranians with the Obama deal? After all both are about curbing nuclear winter.
I mean, it's absolutely astounding to say that when the peninsula was crawling with American and Chinese soldiers 65 years ago.
Supportive of what? What exactly did SK get other then a promise for NK to consider denuking in the future?How can you say that when South Koreans are overwhelmingly supportive?