@blackangst1 - in case you would like to hear the interpretation of an actual former federal prosecutor and defense attorney on whether or not Trump is guilty of a crime you can listen to it here:
Essentially, the takeaway is that he definitely fulfilled two of the three elements (incitement to imminent lawless/violent action). The primary impediment will be proving Trump's state of mind that he intended to do this.
Does this make you reconsider your position in any way? If not, why?
Insurrection and impeachment | All the Presidents' Lawyers
Josh Barro and Ken White talk about the legal ramifications for the people who mobbed the U.S. Capitol building, and for President Trump.
www.kcrw.com
Essentially, the takeaway is that he definitely fulfilled two of the three elements (incitement to imminent lawless/violent action). The primary impediment will be proving Trump's state of mind that he intended to do this.
Does this make you reconsider your position in any way? If not, why?