Trump Bat Sh!t crazy thread

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 4, 2009
34,695
15,931
136
Anyone able to power up the batshiat insane decipher machine needed to decipher this word salad?

I am very fluent in deplorable.
I believe he is making fun of someone who is being weak. May have something to do with getting weak cucks to enlist to become men, not sure of that because too much is missing from the clip and I refuse to sign up for Twitter.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,649
7,145
136
Like I wrote, let's see what happens if Trump could somehow deport every illegal in this country day one.

I don't think 1955 Leave it to Beaver bliss would suddenly break out like all the conservatives think.

And anyway, aren't they also whining about losing population? Seems like you kill two birds with one stone!

His MAGAts would be thrown into a fit of confusion and bewilderment. They would be wandering the streets and alleys feeling completely lost because they'd have nothing to criticize and hammer Biden with anymore. Trump would be repeatedly slamming his The Art of the Steal book to his forehead for realizing he did what he told his House of Rep stooges not to do.

But there wouldn't be a single hint of protest from his cult coddlers because they worship Trump as a deity.

If one sunny day Jesus showed up and declared he wanted to run against Trump as a Democrat, Trump's MAGAts would definitely try to nail him to a cross all over again.
 

Stokely

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2017
1,771
2,319
136
Every Trump clip where he's not locked onto a teleprompter is weird, and has been for years as someone else posted in response to the electrocuted shark insanity.

I won't watch or listen to him, reading transcripts is as far as I'll go and it really highlights just how insane his "points" are.

Some of it may be a NY thing....my coworker is about 1000 times smarter than Trump and while he doesn't say nonsensical things, he does do that kind of sing-song "verbal wandering" with a lot of "well, you know, some people are saying" and "I don't know...maybe it's just me...." thrown in like Trump does. Every sentence is never-ending.
 

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
25,005
4,362
136
Anyone able to power up the batshiat insane decipher machine needed to decipher this word salad?
From what I read it was mocking transgender athletes, although with Trump it's hard to tell for sure. edit: Apparently it is not the first time he's told that story as the article I'm quoting is from 2023.

"Former President Donald Trump performed a bizarre skit during a rally, pantomiming and mimicking as a woman weightlifter in a rant against transgender athletes."

There is, apparently, no minority group he won't mock.

 
Last edited:

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,667
3,066
136
From what I read it was mocking transgender athletes, although with Trump it's hard to tell for sure.

"Former President Donald Trump performed a bizarre skit during a rally, pantomiming and mimicking as a woman weightlifter in a rant against transgender athletes."

There is, apparently, no minority group he won't mock.


i believe that is correct and it's shtick that's he has done repeatedly.
 
Reactions: allisolm

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,273
4,565
136
I won't watch or listen to him, reading transcripts is as far as I'll go and it really highlights just how insane his "points" are.
but but but a transcript doesn’t show inflections, pauses how bigly his statements are!!!!!!
 

Stokely

Golden Member
Jun 5, 2017
1,771
2,319
136
His inflections literally give me hives.

There are a few people whose voice and mannerisms are nails on a chalkboard, he's high on the list. Doesn't help that the things he's saying piss me the hell off.

I even try to stay away from the transcripts for my own stress levels. Every time I read one all I can think of is the vast numbers of people who buy into what he's selling. Not a happy thought.
 
Reactions: iRONic and hal2kilo

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,260
8,192
136
There are a few people whose voice and mannerisms are nails on a chalkboard, he's high on the list. Doesn't help that the things he's saying piss me the hell off.

I find that as well, and the odd thing is it doesn't always have a direct relationship to the actual content of their speech. There are some people, radio presenters and podcasters, whose accent or enunciation and verbal tics I find hard to endure even when I don't disagree with what they are saying.

Of course, in Trump's case the form and content are well-matched, in that both are incredibly irritating, but sometimes I can't work out if I dislike their voice because I've come to dislike them because of their opinions, or if my dislike of their speaking voice is entirely independent of those opinions (a certain right-wing radio host comes to mind - I can't stand their views but I'm sure I disliked them as soon as I heard them, just because of their voice)

Conversely some people just have listenable voices even if one isn't particularly interested in what they are talking about.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
Do you agree that "illegal" immigrants do not receive benefits from the federal government?

Serious question, do you really think the people coming here just want free stuff and have no desire to work?


I do agree that they are not supposed to get federal benefits.


I don't think that is the entirety of the incentive to come. I also think many would not embark on their journey without the added incentive.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
No, one is right and one is wrong. They are in compliance with federal immigration law and therefore they are not illegal immigrants. There is no requirement to enter at a port of entry - actually federal law explicitly states the opposite.

If you don’t like the law then try to change it but don’t pretend people are breaking it when they are not.

“Illegal Entry”/8 U.S.C. § 1325 makes it a crime to unlawfully enter the United States. It applies to people who do not enter with proper inspection at a port of entry, such as those who enter between ports of entry, avoid examination or inspection, or who make false statements while entering or attempting to enter. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, up to six months in prison, or both.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,623
49,185
136
“Illegal Entry”/8 U.S.C. § 1325 makes it a crime to unlawfully enter the United States. It applies to people who do not enter with proper inspection at a port of entry, such as those who enter between ports of entry, avoid examination or inspection, or who make false statements while entering or attempting to enter. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, up to six months in prison, or both.
Nope.

They are asylum seekers and as long as your case is being adjudicated you are not here illegally.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
Nope.

They are asylum seekers and as long as your case is being adjudicated you are not here illegally.

We are arguing apples and oranges.

8 U.S.C. § 1325 makes it a crime to unlawfully enter the United States. It applies to people who do not enter with proper inspection at a port of entry, such as those who enter between ports of entry, avoid examination or inspection, or who make false statements while entering or attempting to enter. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, up to six months in prison, or both.

NOTE: This is about illegal entry not asylum. If you do not comply with the law stated above you are in fact an illegal alien. ( Note the distinction between the Law and what you cited which was a Trump Administration Rule).

I agree that If they are seeking an asylum status they are and should be allowed to stay until their case is judged and finalized. I also do not think that all or even most entering currently are qualified for asylum.

To be eligible for asylum, you must be:
  • Inside the United States
  • Able to demonstrate that you were persecuted or have a fear of persecution in your home country due to your:
    • Race
    • Religion
    • Nationality
    • Social group
    • Political opinion
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,623
49,185
136
We are arguing apples and oranges.

8 U.S.C. § 1325 makes it a crime to unlawfully enter the United States. It applies to people who do not enter with proper inspection at a port of entry, such as those who enter between ports of entry, avoid examination or inspection, or who make false statements while entering or attempting to enter. A first offense is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, up to six months in prison, or both.

NOTE: This is about illegal entry not asylum. If you do not comply with the law stated above you are in fact an illegal alien. ( Note the distinction between the Law and what you cited which was a Trump Administration Rule).

I agree that If they are seeking an asylum status they allowed to stay until their case is judged and finalized.

To be eligible for asylum, you must be:
  • Inside the United States
  • Able to demonstrate that you were persecuted or have a fear of persecution in your home country due to your:
    • Race
    • Religion
    • Nationality
    • Social group
    • Political opinion
If you have an active asylum application you are not here illegally. Plain and simple. It was not ‘they are here illegally but cannot be removed.’

The ruling was that asylum seekers who enter at places other than ports of entry are not violating the law.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,273
4,565
136
If you have an active asylum application you are not here illegally. Plain and simple. It was not ‘they are here illegally but cannot be removed.’

The ruling was that asylum seekers who enter at places other than ports of entry are not violating the law.
Asylum seekers should sue congress critters that repeatedly say this “illegals” BS
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
If you have an active asylum application you are not here illegally. Plain and simple. It was not ‘they are here illegally but cannot be removed.’

The ruling was that asylum seekers who enter at places other than ports of entry are not violating the law.

I quoted the actual law 8 U.S.C. § 1325 which says it is a crime to Unlawfully Enter except at a port of entry... ~

If you do something that is unlawful that makes it illegal.

Illegal means “not according to or authorized by law” and lists unlawful as a synonym. Unlawful means “not lawful” with illegal as a synonym. So, by definition, they mean the same thing and can be used interchangeably.

We are not going to agree on this as the text of the U.S.C is clear and In my opinion is that a Judge cannot just negate the law on his own. And as I said above anyone that has an actual asylum claim should be allowed a pass until their claim is validated in court. If it isn't validated they should be deported.
 
Reactions: iRONic

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
46,639
34,461
136
And as I said above anyone that has an actual asylum claim should be allowed a pass until their claim is validated in court. If it isn't validated they should be deported.

People are crossing away from the ports of entry because the government is not allowing them to present themselves in a timely, orderly manner.

If people were allowed to do so, arguably as the law requires, there would be no issue.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,623
49,185
136
I quoted the actual law 8 U.S.C. § 1325 which says it is a crime to Unlawfully Enter except at a port of entry... ~

If you do something that is unlawful that makes it illegal.

Illegal means “not according to or authorized by law” and lists unlawful as a synonym. Unlawful means “not lawful” with illegal as a synonym. So, by definition, they mean the same thing and can be used interchangeably.

We are not going to agree on this as the text of the U.S.C is clear and In my opinion is that a Judge cannot just negate the law on his own. And as I said above anyone that has an actual asylum claim should be allowed a pass until their claim is validated in court. If it isn't validated they should be deported.
And I quoted a judge looking at the totality of US law and agreeing with me.

I’m right. If you don’t want to admit it done, but I’m right.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
And I quoted a judge looking at the totality of US law and agreeing with me.

I’m right. If you don’t want to admit it done, but I’m right.

A single judge cannot do away with the law.

I have noting to admit.

Glad you are done.
I too am finished with this as it is clear nothing will be done to correct it.
 
Reactions: iRONic

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,491
4,588
136
They literally can, and do.

I stand corrected on this point.

Although his ruling as stated in the linked article only held that they could still apply for asylum regardless of where they entered. And that the Trump administrations asylum rule was invalid.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |