- Feb 15, 2002
- 17,788
- 6,040
- 136
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ngerous-racial-divide/?utm_term=.a860808f723a
The Washington Post and the New York Times both wrote Monday night about President Trump’s increasingly overt attempts to divide the American electorate by stoking racial fears. That same night, Trump used a very telling word that both confirms that narrative and threatens to divide our country even more.
Trump decided to call himself a “nationalist.”
“A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly, not caring about our country so much. And you know what? We can’t have that,” Trump said at a rally in Texas. “You know, they have a word — it’s sort of became old-fashioned — it’s called a ‘nationalist.' And I say, really, we’re not supposed to use that word. You know what I am? I’m a nationalist, okay? I’m a nationalist. Nationalist. Nothing wrong. Use that word. Use that word.”
Bannon and the White supremacists can be proud. It's not like we didn't already know.
The Washington Post and the New York Times both wrote Monday night about President Trump’s increasingly overt attempts to divide the American electorate by stoking racial fears. That same night, Trump used a very telling word that both confirms that narrative and threatens to divide our country even more.
Trump decided to call himself a “nationalist.”
“A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly, not caring about our country so much. And you know what? We can’t have that,” Trump said at a rally in Texas. “You know, they have a word — it’s sort of became old-fashioned — it’s called a ‘nationalist.' And I say, really, we’re not supposed to use that word. You know what I am? I’m a nationalist, okay? I’m a nationalist. Nationalist. Nothing wrong. Use that word. Use that word.”
Bannon and the White supremacists can be proud. It's not like we didn't already know.