So where do you rate? And by whose metrics?
And do you think you were born to that status?
So where do you rate? And by whose metrics?Because it doesnt match with reality. There will always be people of average talent, below average talent, above average talent, and elite.
Quoting Emperor Charles Zi Brittania
“All men are not created equal. Some are born swifter afoot. Some with greater beauty. Some are born into poverty. And others born sick and feeble. Both in birth and in upbringing. In sheer scope of ability; every human is inherently different. Yes, that is why people discriminate against one another. Which is why there is struggle, competition, and the unfaltering march of progress. Inequality is not wrong, Equality is.”
A Meritocracy would be the supreme, most desirable, and most beneficial form of sociology-economic system. Not a pseudo meritocracy based on nepotism, but one where everyone is forced to compete for every gain is the only one where men truly become the salt of the earth.
Gotta admit, it's fun to quote the Declaration of Independence, George Washington, and the Constitution itself, and have some 'conservative' denounce all if it as socialism and then pretend to lecture about what ideas he thinks America was really founded upon: Rambo.
So where do you rate? And by whose metrics?
And do you think you were born to that status?
He is the best god damn fry cook at MicDonalds ever.
I duessed he was an executive milo ball licker.He is the best god damn fry cook at MicDonalds ever.
He sure picked a good week to come out.
The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
Nationalism is a symptom of looking at the world as a zero sum game.
If the world is a zero sum game, then how does technology keep advancing?Reality is that the world is a zero sum game.
Of course he is a white nationalist. Where have you been? You missed minority vote suppression, attacks on black football players for peacefully protesting police brutality, his hounding of the Central Park Five and demanding death penalty even after they were exonerated, all the racist crap he pulled on blacks who wanted to rent in his buildings, the Mexicans are rapists thing?The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
Reality is that the world is a zero sum game.
That's a loser mentality.Reality is that the world is a zero sum game.
Reality is that the world is a zero sum game.
Arh.. as suspected, its the thinker thats broken....Reality is that the world is a zero sum game.
The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
Nationalism doesn't have to be white, but it does have to explicitly attempt to "shut out" "others".The hell is wrong with you posters? You guys putting white in front of nationalist. There is no inherent racial motive to standing by America's national interests. Nationalist? Exchange the word with selfish, if you must, for you to better grasp the meaning. "Putting America first" appeals to people, especially those gutted by trickle down and in desperate need of a savior. All Trump is doing is virtue signaling to them, that their needs are his campaign. That he's offering them economic protection.
It has been his populist creed since day 1. He has just chosen a new buzzword to associate with it. Then you go and attach your own meanings to it, and yell "gotcha!". You would be best served without delusion or distraction. And instead attack the stupendous failure of "America first" policy at its core. It doesn't work and we Democrat voters know it doesn't.
If we care to win an election, we had best start explaining that to people, not meekly mocking the dog whistle.
We need policy, not a doomed conflict.
Ah, the zero sum nonsense comes out. Yeah, I'm not going to engage you more earnestly, since you're all hat and no cattle.
Why aren't all people equal in your eyes?
Because it doesnt match with reality. There will always be people of average talent, below average talent, above average talent, and elite.
And it's even worse than that, because the distribution of some traits, like creativity for example, is not at all linear. In fact it follows a Pareto distribution, which is a square root law. The square root of a number of people in a productive domain account for 50% of the output. So in a business of 10 people 3 do half the work, but in a business of 10,000 people, 100 of them produce 50% of the output. That's why C-level employees and upper management are paid disproportionally higher. If you look at wealth it follows the same Pareto distribution which is why you have the 1% owning most of the money.
In creative domains the median creative output of people is zero. This is the sort of thing you can learn from Peterson's personality lectures actually, it's extremely interesting. 2017 lectures, the last half of them all deals with the big 5 model and IQ/Creativity, it's good to learn the science and the math it relies on.