Ever check out the podesta-emails? Of course not.So, don't address the point (can't, it goes against what you believe) and instead spout off batshit tinfoil theories because potato. Typical. Literally no one here is surprised.
Yeah, kinda like how podesta-emails show that they like you guys "compliant and unaware".Ever hear the term "Unwitting Agent" or the less PC term because I know you guys hate PC speak "Retarded Agent"
Ever check out the podesta-emails? Of course not.
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.Got any specifics or are you going to continue to lean on the one you've posted (from the alt-right twitter sphere talking points machine) that's already been debunked?
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.
You go the wiki and look for the one where podesta fully admits she hates americans.
Ohh, one was debunked, but the others haven't.
You go the wiki and look for the one where podesta fully admits she hates americans.
On the contrary, it is quite fun to see you guys try to defend the fact that hillary is corrupt, knows that we are letting terrorists in, knows saudi and Qatar are funding isis...etc.
Her actions are far worse than trumps yet you don't care
The coordination of the media with hillary, as is being exposed, should alarm everybody. As should the podesta-emails showing that there was coordination at the dept of state with clinton campaign about email releases, info passing to them about congressional inquires re uranium one...etc.
There is no independent media or government, there is the vampire squid. That is all.
Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.Uh, that's the one you've already leaned on and had knocked out from under you. The fall and subsequent head injury might explain a lot.
And it seems I wasn't the first one to point this out. Please, continue on with your cognitive dissonance. It's more entertaining than watching my dog fart in her sleep. But only by a little.
Please, she trashed these women roundly and protected bill throughout. Most men who bang interns in the Whitehouse would be trashed, utterly, because it is workplace abuse of power. But you only care about some women, not all.
I don't hate you, but hillary does.
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
I believe that should be "Look retard,"Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.
Look retard. Not the bucket of losers, thst one, admittedly, was debunked (and never came from wiki). The other, the one that just came out today, was directly from wiki.
Please, she trashed these women roundly and protected bill throughout. Most men who bang interns in the Whitehouse would be trashed, utterly, because it is workplace abuse of power. But you only care about some women, not all.
I don't hate you, but hillary does.
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433
Ahh, grammar nazis. Or, more likely, that I typed it quickly and hit space bar instead of comma and I didn't notice.I believe that should be "Look retard,"
The period implies you're pointing out a retard, which means you're probably typing in front of a mirror.
Ahh, grammar nazis. Or, more likely, that I typed it quickly and hit space bar instead of comma and I didn't notice.
Link to debunking?Hey fuckstick, it's the link you posted earlier (quoted below so you can't weasel out of it) that has already been all over twitter today and roundly debunked. And as already pointed out here, the fucking email doesn't make any sense if you interpret it the way your masters have directed you to. If you read it with common sense (I know, tall order for you) then its very easy to see why you couldn't be more wrong. And also why it was very easily brushed aside as garbage by the members of the species with synaptic activity.
Link to debunking?
So where is the debunking? She privately hates americans and he wants to publicly say she is their champion.http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/l...-clinton-hates-the-phrase-everyday-americans/
Or, you could, I don't know, read the email itself.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/l...-clinton-hates-the-phrase-everyday-americans/
Or, you could, I don't know, read the email itself.
So where is the debunking? She privately hates americans and he wants to publicly say she is their champion.
Debunking not found. Email stands. Interpretation: she hates americans, stands.
See how the game is played?http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/l...-clinton-hates-the-phrase-everyday-americans/
Or, you could, I don't know, read the email itself.
Really?Link to debunking?
See how the game is played?
Is this one of those things like where you earlier admitted even when presented with evidence, you wouldn't believe it? Asking for a friend.
You can't even comprehend an email at this point. Ask yourself a question, if this were in fact true, wouldn't more than InfoWars/Breitbart/Random twitter egg named "Deplorable{insert name here}" be shouting about it? Again. Occam's razor.
Get help. Seriously.
Really?
You need that to be explained to you?
It's obviously saying that she hates the phrasing "everyday Americans" hence him saying that he still thinks that we should use it anyway.
"I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion."
Was it in quotes? I mean, since we are taking things out of context we should apply the same across the board.Really?
You need that to be explained to you?
It's obviously saying that she hates the phrasing "everyday Americans" hence him saying that he still thinks that we should use it anyway.
"I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion."
His interpretation doesn't even make grammatical sense. It requires Podesta to be referring to plural everyday Americans as a singular 'it'.