This guy is/was a democrat and now his true colors as a plant is coming out. Also, wtf did these recordings not come out a year ago to deep six his campaign?!! Any of the other candidates would've been better
That's why smart politicians do op research on themselves first.This guy is/was a democrat and now his true colors as a plant is coming out. Also, wtf did these recordings not come out a year ago to deep six his campaign?!! Any of the other candidates would've been better
How would putting Democrat supermajorities in congress going to help anything. You've essential created the People's American 'Party' with no opposition at all. The world's countries with 1 party rule aren't exactly bastions of freedom.After 2008 and 2012 the GOP did the same things: (1) Do an internal study as to why they lost-basic conclusion each time is they need to reach out and capture a larger portion of the Hispanic vote, etc, which reports were only given lip service until Trump actively trashed them this time around. and (2) the GOP congress critters will vote and act in lockstep actively opposing each and everything the President seeks.
The exact same things will happen this time. The only difference will be Trump will be persona non grata in GOP circles-he will be blamed for everything and will have absolutely no influence after the polls close on November 8th.
Hopefully American voters wake up and throw he bums out in Congress-that is really what is crippling us. Ironically if Trumpistas refuse to vote for GOP underticket then they actually will be taking some real (and unintended) action to make America great again.
This guy is/was a democrat and now his true colors as a plant is coming out. Also, wtf did these recordings not come out a year ago to deep six his campaign?!! Any of the other candidates would've been better
How would putting Democrat supermajorities in congress going to help anything. You've essential created the People's American 'Party' with no opposition at all. The world's countries with 1 party rule aren't exactly bastions of freedom.
We don't have parliamentary system. In other words there's no reason for reasoning and compromise as our polarization has been so complete that all the reps vote lock-step with the party with few dissenters, The few that speak out are ousted out in the next election cycle. In parliamentary system they're forced to compromise as they have to share power. In our system there is no need to compromise anymore with a supermajority. Also we have a President - who would be empowered with the party in power- to wreck tyranny.One party rule happens reasonably often in most developed countries. I mean parliamentary systems give one party (or the governing coalition) unfettered power to pursue their agenda. It works out fine. No opposition would mean that the Republicans weren't free to run for election again in two years with an improved platform.
I don't even know where to begin.The same is true on the Democratic side. Hillary is a terrible candidate, and she would have lost as well if the leaks had come out earlier. It sucks, but I don't think it's any sort of conspiracy, there's simply a lot more media attention and digging for details during the general election.
We don't have parliamentary system. In other words there's no reason for reasoning and compromise as our polarization has been so complete that all the reps vote lock-step with the party with few dissenters, The few that speak out are ousted out in the next election cycle. In parliamentary system they're forced to compromise as they have to share power. In our system there is no need to compromise anymore with a supermajority. Also we have a President - who would be empowered with the party in power- to wreck tyranny.
How would putting Democrat supermajorities in congress going to help anything. You've essential created the People's American 'Party' with no opposition at all. The world's countries with 1 party rule aren't exactly bastions of freedom.
That's what we did in California, and all of the sudden problems that we were told were unsolvable started getting solved. We need political competition but not political sabotage and obstruction. Unless GOP learns to put the country first, it should be snuffed out, to make room for another opposition party eventually.
How would that even work? "Let's go grab some women by the titsReally? They *LET* Him? And not to mention, according to sources, it is a *highly* edited audio to maximize impact against trump, so I doubt it's nearly as bad as they released.
This was a coup attempt.
Come on, dude. Even you cannot be honestly stupid enough to believe that serial groping of women is fine, but talking about it is the real problem. Both Clinton and Schwarzenegger are well known for groping women and have multiple credible accusations of such. Clinton in particular had to settle at least one lawsuit for the same AND lost his law license for his perjury in fighting another consensual but illegal dalliance. Trump, to my knowledge, has no such credible accusations. (Although smart money is on him having bought off some women to avoid such lawsuits.)To my knowledge, Arnold has not spoken in a way that demeans women, nor has Bill. Donald obviously has & therein lies the difference you so desperately avoid.
This is the natural result of nominating such a horrible person as Trump: the left no longer feels the need to hide its desire for "unfettered power to pursue their agenda".One party rule happens reasonably often in most developed countries. I mean parliamentary systems give one party (or the governing coalition) unfettered power to pursue their agenda. It works out fine. No opposition would mean that the Republicans weren't free to run for election again in two years with an improved platform.
Come on, dude. Even you cannot be honestly stupid enough to believe that serial groping of women is fine, but talking about it is the real problem. Both Clinton and Schwarzenegger are well known for groping women and have multiple credible accusations of such. Clinton in particular had to settle at least one lawsuit for the same AND lost his law license for his perjury in fighting another consensual but illegal dalliance. Trump, to my knowledge, has no such credible accusations. (Although smart money is on him having bought off some women to avoid such lawsuits.)
I agree with your last line. It's exactly the same view shared by Bill and Hillary. Bill in particular has pawed lots of women, some of whom definitely did not want to be pawed.Spin Central took awhile to come up with that, huh?
I think we need to leave Arnold out of this. Bill's proclivities are well known and overblown, but that's not the point. Trump's remarks reveal an attitude about women to women that you can only project onto Bill. And, if you think about it at all, Trump's story about hitting on a married woman tells us what he thinks about us all. We're just here for his amusement.
Bill in particular has pawed lots of women, some of whom definitely did not want to be pawed.
True, but compare that to Trump who may just be a big nasty talker. Bill has actual accusers over several decades.Not to defend Bill, But we know he slept with an ADULT intern. The rest is conjecture.
How would putting Democrat supermajorities in congress going to help anything. You've essential created the People's American 'Party' with no opposition at all. The world's countries with 1 party rule aren't exactly bastions of freedom.
As LawNewz first unearthed in February, Harth filed a lawsuit against the real estate mogul in 1997 accusing him of sexual assault, including “groping” her under her dress on several occasions, “forcibly” moving her to his daughter’s bedroom at Mar-a-Lago in an “attempted rape,” and repeatedly and aggressively propositioning her for sex.
“It was in one of the children’s room of Mar-a-Lago. He is showing this mural and the next thing I know he was pushing me up against the wall, and was making a move on me, and was all over me and again I was taken aback,” Harth said.
True, but compare that to Trump who may just be a big nasty talker. Bill has actual accusers over several decades.
Although to my knowledge, only one actual rape accuser, and I never found Juanita Broderick to be credible. If you want me to believe that a man actually raped you, don't wait a decade to claim it: do it while there can be physical evidence. If you want me to believe that a man might have raped you, don't continue seeking him out and doing business with him.
This is the natural result of nominating such a horrible person as Trump: the left no longer feels the need to hide its desire for "unfettered power to pursue their agenda".
I agree with your last line. It's exactly the same view shared by Bill and Hillary. Bill in particular has pawed lots of women, some of whom definitely did not want to be pawed.
The triumph of bullshit has consequences far beyond the political realm, making society as a whole more credulous and willing to accept all sorts of irrational beliefs. A newly published article in the academic journal Judgment and Decision Making
links “bullshit receptivity” to other forms of impaired thinking: “Those more receptive to bullshit are less reflective, lower in cognitive ability (i.e., verbal and fluid intelligence, numeracy), are more prone to ontological confusions and conspiratorial ideation, are more likely to hold religious and paranormal beliefs, and are more likely to endorse complementary and alternative medicine.”
This is the natural result of nominating such a horrible person as Trump: the left no longer feels the need to hide its desire for "unfettered power to pursue their agenda".
I like how the Republicans nominated a horrible person, and it's still the left's fault.Yes, you've cracked the case and the left has exposed its lust for tyranny. Good job!