the fact? based on what? None of you have the balls to even support a claim. what pathetic little imbeciles you twats are.
The fact that HRC is the worst SOS of all time should be self evident to anyone even remotely informed. and neutral.
The only person that would deny that is an extreme partisan hack that would ignore any evidence you gave them anyway.
Nice shitpsting rebuttal. You replied to the same thing twice... Double the shitposting. GJWacko alert!!!
the fact? based on what? None of you have the balls to even support a claim. what pathetic little imbeciles you twats are.
Yah, I knew you were fishing for that.... too obvious. I gave it to you out of pity.
Sorry, it's not debunked.
Washing post is bought by Bezos and has a huge deal with the CIA. It's a shitrag.
The facts of the matter is that HRC got 145 million in donations funneled into the TCF, and Bill Clinton got another 0.5 million for a "speech" to a Russian bank.
Those facts remain. What was supposed debunked is was the 20% uranium claim, and the claim that HRC made this decision by herself. However, these aren't really important. The amount of power the Clintons wield is immense! So the claim that HRC couldn't make the decision herself, while true, isn't particularly compelling. What the money was for? Who knows, who cares?
PS: I notice you didn't talk about the $ from Saudi Arabia.
Even in the so called debunked articles, the facts I listed are not denied. All they claim is that HRC couldn't have agreed to it on her own, thus incorrectly insinuating that the other votes weren't manipulated.Textbook denial.
BTW the Clinton foundation was a well run non-profit that dispersed its funds appropriately.
- No supporting facts do your opinion
- Proclaim bias and conspiracy when presented with facts that contradict your opinion
- Followed by moving goal posts to another unsupported opinion.
For what reasons?
Even in the so called debunked articles, the facts I listed are not denied. All they claim is that HRC couldn't have agreed to it on her own, thus incorrectly insinuating that the other votes weren't manipulated.
Holy shit, you're back, I had just assumed you were the pilot on MH370. I guess Taj had to switch accounts because too many people had him on ignore.
Quick question. Do you know when those donations came to the Clinton foundation? Do you know how much of that number came before she was asked to be SoS? Do you know that the one person who donated he bulk to the foundation had no association with U1 at the time he donated?Even in the so called debunked articles, the facts I listed are not denied. All they claim is that HRC couldn't have agreed to it on her own, thus incorrectly insinuating that the other votes weren't manipulated.
The FACT that they got the money was never debunked, because it's a fact. And that's really the ONLY thing that matters. A foreign govt paid our SOS's husband 0.5 million dollars, and their "charity" another 145 million.
Do you people ever make real arguments or do you just throw out red herrings when backed into a corner?That would be the Kenyan voodoo time warp mind control, right?
Quick question. Do you know when those donations came to the Clinton foundation? Do you know how much of that number came before she was asked to be SoS? Do you know that the one person who donated he bulk to the foundation had no association with U1 at the time he donated?
If you want to talk facts let’s talk facts.
I bet that sounded cool to you when popping zits in front of your bathroom mirror, didn't it?
Pay to play, e.g. Uranian One and Benghazi.
And what was her position when it was donated?Do you people ever make real arguments or do you just throw out red herrings when backed into a corner?
Quite sad and pathetic really.
He was like 1 year removed or something iirc. Get real...
Besides, the money is what matters the most. It reeks of corruption.
Do you people ever make real arguments or do you just throw out red herrings when backed into a corner?
Quite sad and pathetic really.
He was like 1 year removed or something iirc. Get real...
Besides, the money is what matters the most. It reeks of corruption.
What does it matter?And what was her position when it was donated?
Even in the so called debunked articles, the facts I listed are not denied. All they claim is that HRC couldn't have agreed to it on her own, thus incorrectly insinuating that the other votes weren't manipulated.
The FACT that they got the money was never debunked, because it's a fact. And that's really the ONLY thing that matters. A foreign govt paid our SOS's husband 0.5 million dollars, and their "charity" another 145 million.
Russiagate is the conspiracy theory here.
Never moved the goal posts... Russiagate is a prime example of moving goal posts.
Yah, ask Haiti about how great the clinton foundation is....
Oh and to clarify it was three years earlier he had sold his holdings. But that’s a minor detail.Do you people ever make real arguments or do you just throw out red herrings when backed into a corner?
Quite sad and pathetic really.
He was like 1 year removed or something iirc. Get real...
Besides, the money is what matters the most. It reeks of corruption.
It matters when the donations occurred when she wasn’t in a position of influence when they are made nor would it be known she would have been. Again. Minor detail I guess.What does it matter?
Bribes are bribes.
So you're insinuating the other votes were manipulated. What proof do you have of that?
Also if there was some ethical conflict or crime in play why haven't the GOP led congress and GOP led department of justice done anything to bring her to justice? Or the obama corrolates of these groups because what you're concerned about goes so far back?
And why are we talking about hillary anyway?
And why are we talking about hillary anyway?
Pay to play, e.g. Uranian One and Benghazi.
You are just mad, because you didn't vote for Bernie sanders, and gave us Trump with a majority in congress. I get it. I understand, and I forgive you. It's time to forgive yourself.The mere mention of Hillary sets them to howling at the moon. It's Pavlovian & they seem to enjoy it, simple minded creatures that they are.
I am saying that the article tries to insinuate that HRC isn't guilty, because she couldn't have passed it through by herself. However, that's ignoring the immense power of the Clintons. It's POSSIBLE that she could have manipulated the other votes to get what she wanted. Thus the ASSUMPTION in the article that this fact debunks the U1 scandal is weak at best.
The article also completely ignores all the money. They weren't buying favors from the clintons, they were just giving them shitloads of money for "reasons".
idk, because someone said that HRC was the worst SOS, and someone else disagreed.
You realize uranium one is a conspiracy theory that’s been debunked by multiple sources, right? It’s fever swamp nonsense.
What specifically about the Benghazi attack makes her the worst SoS of all time?
I am saying that the article tries to insinuate that HRC isn't guilty, because she couldn't have passed it through by herself. However, that's ignoring the immense power of the Clintons. It's POSSIBLE that she could have manipulated the other votes to get what she wanted. Thus the ASSUMPTION in the article that this fact debunks the U1 scandal is weak at best.
The article also completely ignores all the money. They weren't buying favors from the clintons, they were just giving them shitloads of money for "reasons".
idk, because someone said that HRC was the worst SOS, and someone else disagreed.