And Holder was found guilty of Contempt of Congress. Whoop de do.
Yep, and Arpaio failed to do that. He's a crook.All sheriffs should stand up for the law.
Yep, and Arpaio failed to do that. He's a crook.
You're right, i was wrong to say a judge found Holder was guilty of contempt.
Jackson called the House contempt motion "entirely unnecessary" and said it was evident that she was considering the government's motion to lift her prior order. "Under those circumstances, the Court finds no basis to hold defendant in contempt," she wrote.
Which means he wasn't guilty. Innocent until proven guilty.......well in your mind unless it's a conservative or a Republican which means they're guilty without a trial by jury.
Corruption is irrelevant. Let's put it in a way you might understand better: what if there was a sheriff who went around town confiscating everyone's guns? Say a court orders him to stop and he refuses, the court holds him in contempt, and Obama pardons him. What's to stop that sheriff (and every other sheriff) from confiscating everyone's gun? Impeachment? Give me a break.
How about being charged for violating the 4th amendment rights of United States citizens.Cheeto finally does something at least partly right.
Arpaio should have never been charged for trying to defend our borders.
Arresting US citizens for no reason is not standing up for the lawAll sheriffs should stand up for the law.
But guns are protected by the US Constitution. Had Arpaio merely gone around checking the legal status of everyone who carried guns, perhaps focusing on those who appeared to be druggies and known felons, and confiscating illegal firearms, that would have been just fine...ILLEGAL immigration is not a right. Law enforcement everywhere should be trying to eliminate (not kill, just capture and return) these illegal invaders.
It shouldn't be unconstitutional to stop some brown people (the most common type of illegal immigrant in the area) living near the border and question their status. If they're citizens or legal immigrants, (LEGAL immigrants are required to carry their green cards at all times, so that should be easy)
But guns are protected by the US Constitution. Had Arpaio merely gone around checking the legal status of everyone who carried guns, perhaps focusing on those who appeared to be druggies and known felons, and confiscating illegal firearms, that would have been just fine...ILLEGAL immigration is not a right. Law enforcement everywhere should be trying to eliminate (not kill, just capture and return) these illegal invaders.
It shouldn't be unconstitutional to stop some brown people (the most common type of illegal immigrant in the area) living near the border and question their status. If they're citizens or legal immigrants, (LEGAL immigrants are required to carry their green cards at all times, so that should be easy)
Our courts are supposedly set up so that ten guilty parties go free so that one innocent does not get convicted, so what is your point?Which means he wasn't guilty. Innocent until proven guilty.......well in your mind unless it's a conservative or a Republican which means they're guilty without a trial by jury.
No challenge is possible in court in this case.
But guns are protected by the US Constitution. Had Arpaio merely gone around checking the legal status of everyone who carried guns, perhaps focusing on those who appeared to be druggies and known felons, and confiscating illegal firearms, that would have been just fine...ILLEGAL immigration is not a right. Law enforcement everywhere should be trying to eliminate (not kill, just capture and return) these illegal invaders.
It shouldn't be unconstitutional to stop some brown people (the most common type of illegal immigrant in the area) living near the border and question their status. If they're citizens or legal immigrants, (LEGAL immigrants are required to carry their green cards at all times, so that should be easy)
Yeah...The pardon itself is Constitutional. The problem is that the crime underlying the criminal contempt charge was that of violating citizens' Constitutional rights, and this gets Arpaio off the hook for that.
So the pardon may be Constitutional, but it's effectively invalidated other people's Constitutional rights by giving a law enforcement officer free rein to violate them without consequence.
I find it hypocritical that people that defend the violence and lawlessness that BLM or antifa routinely practice has anything at all to say about law and order.Your transformation into boomerang is becoming apparent.
That said, I believe trump is within his constitutional power to pardon Joe. I just find it hypocritical that the "law and order" president saw it fit to pardon someone who refused to follow the law.
Its par for the course though. Its funny watching trump cult members justify it though. Their use of "b...bb... But Obama" is hilarious, especially because these same people complained about Obama not enforcing the law.
Tell it to your antifa thugs.God bless their little black fascist hearts...
Tell it to your antifa thugs.
Bullshit. He pissed in the Obama's justice department Cheerios for good reason. Hypocrites like you that support lawlessness and political violence have no leg to stand on.Antifa doesn't hide behind badges. It's one thing for them to break the law, entirely another for Arpaio or any other servant of the courts to do so, particularly when instructed to cease & desist.
Trump endorses the arrogant stupidity of defying a federal court order & the fascism driving it.
Show us on the doll where the Constitution touched you.Bullshit. He pissed in the Obama's justice department Cheerios for good reason. Hypocrites like you that support lawlessness and political violence have no leg to stand on.
Just the walking in on underage girls in what is supposed to be the privacy of their dressing room and grabbing unconsenting women by the pussy lying about contact with a hostile government nepostical kind of crook.You mean Bradley Manning kind of crook or Hillary Clinton kind of crook?
Seeing that he's a catholic I don't think that was the constitution touching him.Show us on the doll where the Constitution touched you.