Question, should her refusal to answer question be disqualifying?
https://splinternews.com/heres-a-trump-judicial-nominee-refusing-to-say-if-she-s-1825189107
Well she certainly was clear that she would uphold it. Personally, there are some court decisions which I find morally good but stretch beyond the Constitution and thus the Court's authority. This is not one of those cases. Would love to hear the nominee's legal thinking on this. But it's a landmine. No way any answer other then "yes it was the correct decision" isn't appreciated as being racist.
If she's has the level of intelligence to be a justice should have no trouble explaining herself.Not supporting Brown doesn't make you a racist. If racism = inherently unequal, to believe in separate and equal... isn't compatible. Alternatively, If you object to judicial activism, also not racism, especially if you're a judge. It would be more telling whether she's religious/conservative than whether she's against a decision without basis. I think judicial activism is fine, as long as it's doing something I personally want, like Brown, but that doesn't mean everyone needs to be so irresponsible. What if they're making decisions you don't like? She may well be supportive of a congressional declaration that separate can't be equal.
Supporting segregation does make you a racist, there is no grey area there. There is no nuance with segregation, if you don't want black people in your school, you are racist.Not supporting Brown doesn't make you a racist. If racism = inherently unequal, to believe in separate and equal... isn't compatible. Alternatively, If you object to judicial activism, also not racism, especially if you're a judge. It would be more telling whether she's religious/conservative than whether she's against a decision without basis. I think judicial activism is fine, as long as it's doing something I personally want, like Brown, but that doesn't mean everyone needs to be so irresponsible. What if they're making decisions you don't like? She may well be supportive of a congressional declaration that separate can't be equal.
Not supporting Brown doesn't make you a racist. If racism = inherently unequal, to believe in separate and equal... isn't compatible. Alternatively, If you object to judicial activism, also not racism, especially if you're a judge. It would be more telling whether she's religious/conservative than whether she's against a decision without basis. I think judicial activism is fine, as long as it's doing something I personally want, like Brown, but that doesn't mean everyone needs to be so irresponsible. What if they're making decisions you don't like? She may well be supportive of a congressional declaration that separate can't be equal.
What about black people that want segregated schools? There was a fellow on the news a year or so back demanding that blacks have their own schools, banks, and currency. I don't think for a moment that this is any kind of movement, but it's obviously a desire held by some.Supporting segregation does make you a racist, there is no grey area there. There is no nuance with segregation, if you don't want black people in your school, you are racist.
Supporting segregation does make you a racist, there is no grey area there. There is no nuance with segregation, if you don't want black people in your school, you are racist.
Bit of a difference when an individual black or white person yelling they want segregated schools. Don't care. State sponsored segregated schools is something a judge should be able to discuss intellectually. This gives people insight as to how they would make future rulings.What about black people that want segregated schools? There was a fellow on the news a year or so back demanding that blacks have their own schools, banks, and currency. I don't think for a moment that this is any kind of movement, but it's obviously a desire held by some.
Yes, any one that wants race based segregation is a racist. If there was a mountain of data that showed improved outcomes from segregation, maybe you could have a debate about it, but the evidence points the other way.What about black people that want segregated schools? There was a fellow on the news a year or so back demanding that blacks have their own schools, banks, and currency. I don't think for a moment that this is any kind of movement, but it's obviously a desire held by some.
This is a problem in the US, but it isn't not state mandated or maintained. It happens because people self segregate, generally along economic lines nowadays.LoL, aren't American schools more segregated than ever? My nieces and nephews are all attending PUBLIC schools with a grand total of 0 African Americans.
What about black people that want segregated schools? There was a fellow on the news a year or so back demanding that blacks have their own schools, banks, and currency. I don't think for a moment that this is any kind of movement, but it's obviously a desire held by some.
Supporting segregation does make you a racist, there is no grey area there. There is no nuance with segregation, if you don't want black people in your school, you are racist.
Derp. The finding of Brown was basically that separate but equal could never actually be equal. Actual history shows that was obviously true.
What about . . .
That's because you choose to not live in racially diverse area.LoL, aren't American schools more segregated than ever? My nieces and nephews are all attending PUBLIC schools with a grand total of 0 African Americans.
Supporting segregation does make you a racist, there is no grey area there. There is no nuance with segregation, if you don't want black people in your school, you are racist.
Confirmed
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.