Almost anything is "an impeachable offense." I'm more interested in your second sentence. When you say it was "clearly about stopping Trump-Russia" are you referring to anything other than what he said in the Holt interview plus a broad assumption you're making based on circumstance? I don't necessarily disagree with your assumption, but I'm not sure there's enough evidence here to get a bunch of repubs on board with criminal prosecution and/or impeachment.
Huh? Obstruction of justice is not minor. What he did is unprecedented.
It isn't just the interview. I don't know what your definition of "beyond a reasonable doubt is", but I would go as far to say that this is "beyond a shadow of a doubt".
Its all moot anyway guys. Unless the Republicans plan on doing something then nothing will come of this.
It's like he read a biography of Richard Nixon and said, 'yep, i'm going to follow that path'.
It's like he read a biography of Richard Nixon and said, 'yep, i'm going to follow that path'.
This comey thing is so boring, probably because it's related to the very boring obsession with russia.
comey = democracy?
Maybe he needs more coffee. I know I do.Oh good you're doing your tired shtick again.
Think harder.
Comey != democracy
I get it. Russia = democracy, and comey is important to russia, but not identical to russia, and therefore not identical to comey (obviously). I used = informally.
But if russia = democracy, then what's the problem?
Drugs are bad, m'kay?
derpWhat you quoted was insane, I agree, but I fixed it in the edit, which you only just missed! It's perfect now, with few exceptions.
Maybe he needs more coffee. I know I do.
According to this he's willing to testify IF it is a public hearing. Yes I want that.