News Trump: Mar-a-Lago just raided by FBI

Page 170 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,758
980
126
So i was going to post a link to this:

but i was too slow; so now he is schedule to testify no friday; now who wants to wager there will be another appeal; which they will also not win; and so forth .... until they can no longer appeal....
 
Reactions: WelshBloke

NWRMidnight

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2001
2,974
2,578
136
Appeals court denied appeal. Will he still appeal to SCOTUS?
So i was going to post a link to this:

but i was too slow; so now he is schedule to testify no friday; now who wants to wager there will be another appeal; which they will also not win; and so forth .... until they can no longer appeal....



I think it's time our courts stop letting people abuse the appeal process. What I mean is hold them to the actual rules of appeals, which usually requires legal basis for the appeal, an alleged material error in the trial, not just the fact that the losing party didn't like the verdict. Not a completely new trial with completely different defense angles, arguments etc. Which is basically what has been taking place in a lot of cases, specially where Trump is concerned.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,651
10,515
136
So i was going to post a link to this:

but i was too slow; so now he is schedule to testify no friday; now who wants to wager there will be another appeal; which they will also not win; and so forth .... until they can no longer appeal....
Oh, it's happening. Some people on this forum actually believe Trump will not be indicted. Really?

“Evidence could be huge”: Experts stunned how fast court denied Trump bid to block lawyer testimony | Salon.com

Mr. Smith has come to Washington with an axe.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,371
4,625
136
Denying the appeal is now just a rinse and repeat. The orange monkey lawyers has no new arguments. So makes no sense to spend more time to consider the ruling. Just instant rejection as per prior ruling.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,713
1,067
136
the big thing about this is if the lawyer was told directly by t(u)r(d)ump that he had no more classified documents so that he would represent that to the feds, then if they can find evidence that t(u)r(d)ump possessed papers when he told the lawyer it is a whole new crime. it goes from the accidental possession to willful retention of classified material along with conspiracy to lie/misrepresent/deceive law enforcement official.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
the big thing about this is if the lawyer was told directly by t(u)r(d)ump that he had no more classified documents so that he would represent that to the feds, then if they can find evidence that t(u)r(d)ump possessed papers when he told the lawyer it is a whole new crime. it goes from the accidental possession to willful retention of classified material along with conspiracy to lie/misrepresent/deceive law enforcement official.
Accidental possession isn’t a crime, only willful and knowing unauthorized possession is. That being said, there is already a mountain of evidence that Trump knew he had them. Like, a huge mountain.

The issue here is if his lawyer testified how we think he did now Trump lied to federal officials which is another felony. Even worse for Trump this is another piece on the pile that Trump knowingly concealed these documents. He’s fucked.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,651
10,515
136
Accidental possession isn’t a crime, only willful and knowing unauthorized possession is. That being said, there is already a mountain of evidence that Trump knew he had them. Like, a huge mountain.

The issue here is if his lawyer testified how we think he did now Trump lied to federal officials which is another felony. Even worse for Trump this is another piece on the pile that Trump knowingly concealed these documents. He’s fucked.
There also seems to be a possible recording involved.
And the dam has been breached.

Meadows, numerous Trump aides, ordered to testify in Jan. 6 probe | The Hill
 
Reactions: Fenixgoon

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,758
980
126
Accidental possession isn’t a crime, only willful and knowing unauthorized possession is. That being said, there is already a mountain of evidence that Trump knew he had them. Like, a huge mountain.

The issue here is if his lawyer testified how we think he did now Trump lied to federal officials which is another felony. Even worse for Trump this is another piece on the pile that Trump knowingly concealed these documents. He’s fucked.
I would phrase it - we hope he is fucked; and there is an easy out; if he gets re-elected in 2024 he can pardon himself....
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,758
980
126
Pssst…he cannot pardon away state charges.
Yes but he can pardon away the mar-a-lago and jan 6 issues. The ny charge is weak even if convicted so that really just leaves Georgia.... though if he was convicted of Jan 6 issue prior to being elected then he would be bar from running again (also I think one of the mar-a-lago potential charge has the same effect; the problem is that these trials (much less conviction are year(s) away).
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
Yes but he can pardon away the mar-a-lago and jan 6 issues. The ny charge is weak even if convicted so that really just leaves Georgia.... though if he was convicted of Jan 6 issue prior to being elected then he would be bar from running again (also I think one of the mar-a-lago potential charge has the same effect; the problem is that these trials (much less conviction are year(s) away).
You don’t even know what the New York charges will be. I think people are strongly underestimating the potential for major felonies there.
 

conehead433

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2002
5,566
890
126
He can already be charged with this NY state law - "According to New York Penal Code § 120.15 you will face a charge of menacing in the third degree if you do anything that puts another person in reasonable fear of physical injury or death. It is a class B misdemeanor." This could rise to another level if it involves a threat to a public official, and especially a state DA which would also bring obstruction of justice charges. Arrest the POS already.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
You don’t even know what the New York charges will be. I think people are strongly underestimating the potential for major felonies there.
He can already be charged with this NY state law - "According to New York Penal Code § 120.15 you will face a charge of menacing in the third degree if you do anything that puts another person in reasonable fear of physical injury or death. It is a class B misdemeanor." This could rise to another level if it involves a threat to a public official, and especially a state DA which would also bring obstruction of justice charges. Arrest the POS already.
I’m still waiting for those charges. Any day now.
I stand by there will be no significant charges.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,371
4,625
136
He will be charged with multiple felonies.
In regards to Stormy Daniel’s, what felonies? Again, it isn’t illegal to pay off someone for their silence. Yes Stormy felt threatened but can it really be proven bodily harm was possible?

Let’s move to Cohen’s pleading guilty charges. His lying to federal officials and tax invasion was on him only. The campaign finance is the only thing that applies to the orange monkey.
 

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
9,366
12,740
146
He can already be charged with this NY state law - "According to New York Penal Code § 120.15 you will face a charge of menacing in the third degree if you do anything that puts another person in reasonable fear of physical injury or death. It is a class B misdemeanor." This could rise to another level if it involves a threat to a public official, and especially a state DA which would also bring obstruction of justice charges. Arrest the POS already.
In regards to Stormy Daniel’s, what felonies? Again, it isn’t illegal to pay off someone for their silence. Yes Stormy felt threatened but can it really be proven bodily harm was possible?
Not Stormy, the DA. I italicized the pertinent part of his post above. He (Trump) had posted a shopped pic of himself holding a bat next to the DA. It could be argued it was a threat, maybe. Might be hard to prove.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
In regards to Stormy Daniel’s, what felonies? Again, it isn’t illegal to pay off someone for their silence. Yes Stormy felt threatened but can it really be proven bodily harm was possible?

Let’s move to Cohen’s pleading guilty charges. His lying to federal officials and tax invasion was on him only. The campaign finance is the only thing that applies to
the orange monkey.
Falsifying business records, for one.

 
Reactions: Meghan54

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,218
4,446
136
If they charge Trump at all, which I still think is about a 50/50 shot at best, and they charge him with falsifying business records in the first degree, which is the felony offense, they will almost certainly plead it down to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor. Because to prove the first degree required them to prove not only that he falsified business records but that he did it with the intent to commit another crime, which in this case will be much more difficult.

All that is going to happen is that Trump will have to pay a small fine, and the DA knows this, and that is why I say it is only a 50/50 chance they will charge him at all. The DA might very well decide it is not in the interest of the state to deal with the fallout of indicting Trump for such a small payoff.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,758
980
126
The most he can be hit for are campaign finance charges
No. There was talk that it could be escalated to a felony if one can draw connection to something or other (I think concealing the act or something or other - i forget the details). There is a secondary thing of his 'threatening' the da recently but that would be a different matter (not sure if it would be the same trail or something new). The real problem (I see) is that it is already q1 2023; can any of these issues be resolved to a conviction prior to q4 of 2024.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
If they charge Trump at all, which I still think is about a 50/50 shot at best, and they charge him with falsifying business records in the first degree, which is the felony offense, they will almost certainly plead it down to falsifying business records in the second degree, which is a misdemeanor. Because to prove the first degree required them to prove not only that he falsified business records but that he did it with the intent to commit another crime, which in this case will be much more difficult.

All that is going to happen is that Trump will have to pay a small fine, and the DA knows this, and that is why I say it is only a 50/50 chance they will charge him at all. The DA might very well decide it is not in the interest of the state to deal with the fallout of indicting Trump for such a small payoff.
I have to note you have now gone from ‘it’s very unlikely he will be charged’ to now it’s 50/50. The odds of him being charged have always been over 90%.

The felony charge there won’t be hard to come up with because we already have the underlying campaign finance crimes.

Also this is only the beginning of the indictments. I’m genuinely confused how this has not been obvious to everyone from the beginning.
 

you2

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2002
5,758
980
126
One thing that kills me - is the republicans were fine with Cohen being tossed in jail; but they cry foul when the 'suppose' mastermind of the same crime Cohen was charged with might be charged. Now we all know why this is the case but the level of disrespect for law and order the Republicans have shown the last few years is shocking and more surprising almost no popular push back. After all law enforcement is all about arresting them not us; it has nothing to do with rules of law.... if you are a republican.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |