Remember when all the Republicans were trashing Cassidy Hutchinson calling her a liar? We will finally find out. My bet she will be vindicated.
IF they tell the truth...lotta MAGAs on his detail.Remember when all the Republicans were trashing Cassidy Hutchinson calling her a liar? We will finally find out. My bet she will be vindicated.
They will just blame the deep stateRemember when all the Republicans were trashing Cassidy Hutchinson calling her a liar? We will finally find out. My bet she will be vindicated.
They might, but lying to federal prosecutors is a lot more dangerous than lying to Congress.IF they tell the truth...lotta MAGAs on his detail.
Remember when all the Republicans were trashing Cassidy Hutchinson calling her a liar? We will finally find out. My bet she will be vindicated.
Lol this wouldn't have any impact on the documents caseIf he would have conceded the election November 2020, he would not be in the legal jeopardy he is in today.
It would definitely be at a lower "temperature". But, he just begs for justice to fall on him.Lol this wouldn't have any impact on the documents case
Yeah I mean the NA and the DOJ went way out of their way to try and avoid charging him with the documents, he just stole so many and was so open about never returning them he forced their hand.It would definitely be at a lower "temperature". But, he just begs for justice to fall on him.
That's the way I see it.Yeah I mean the NA and the DOJ went way out of their way to try and avoid charging him with the documents, he just stole so many and was so open about never returning them he forced their hand.
If he just returned them it would have been a non-issue. I think he has given the middle finger to our justice system too many times for it to be ignored.Yeah I mean the NA and the DOJ went way out of their way to try and avoid charging him with the documents, he just stole so many and was so open about never returning them he forced their hand.
Confessing on Hannity was probably a bad idea too.If he just returned them it would have been a non-issue. I think he has given the middle finger to our justice system too many times for it to be ignored.
So there is a perjury trap after all. /sThey might, but lying to federal prosecutors is a lot more dangerous than lying to Congress.
That is one of the FBI’s go-to moves. Ask you a question that they already know the answer to but is incriminating to someone. If you answer truthfully fine, if you lie now they have you for a felony - then they ask if you would prefer to cooperate or to go to prison.
Heaven, I'm in heaven...
This is the ultimate charge I've been looking for, with this whole adventure.
Experts: New report suggests Trump may face "Espionage Act" charges
Jack Smith's team is asking witnesses if Trump showed off a map containing sensitive national security info.www.salon.com
Investigators have asked whether Trump showed classified documents, including maps, to political donors, The Washington Post reported earlier this month.
The Post reported that investigators have compiled evidence of possible obstruction by Trump, including evidence that the former president personally rummaged through boxes of sensitive information after being hit with a subpoena for their return. But investigators are also interested in what Trump did with the documents after leaving office.
Investigators have asked when Trump was at Mar-a-Lago last year and whether he stayed there to look at the boxes before DOJ officials went to the club to retrieve them in June, according to the Times.
Trump usually leaves Florida for his Bedminster, N.J., club earlier than he did last year and was present when DOJ officials visited on June 3, according to the report. Trump had aides bring him boxes to sift through after a grand jury subpoena was issued in May, sources told the outlet.
New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman predicted that evidence of Trump disseminating national defense information "could put this case into [the] echelon of more serious charges under Espionage Act."
Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg agreed that Smith likely isn't asking about the map to build an obstruction case.
"I think the reason that they asked about the map is another statute, 18 USC 719 (e), 'The Espionage Statute,' says that someone who is unauthorized to have possession of a map and then shows it to someone who can't see it violates that statute," he told MSNBC. "So, they're not just going after him for obstruction, but also espionage, which is punishable by up to ten years in prison. That's why there's a lot of trouble ahead.
Attorney George Conway told MSNBC that the Mar-a-Lago case is "the shortest distance between Donald John Trump and an orange jumpsuit."
Heaven, I'm in heaven...
This is the ultimate charge I've been looking for, with this whole adventure.
Experts: New report suggests Trump may face "Espionage Act" charges
Jack Smith's team is asking witnesses if Trump showed off a map containing sensitive national security info.www.salon.com
Investigators have asked whether Trump showed classified documents, including maps, to political donors, The Washington Post reported earlier this month.
The Post reported that investigators have compiled evidence of possible obstruction by Trump, including evidence that the former president personally rummaged through boxes of sensitive information after being hit with a subpoena for their return. But investigators are also interested in what Trump did with the documents after leaving office.
Investigators have asked when Trump was at Mar-a-Lago last year and whether he stayed there to look at the boxes before DOJ officials went to the club to retrieve them in June, according to the Times.
Trump usually leaves Florida for his Bedminster, N.J., club earlier than he did last year and was present when DOJ officials visited on June 3, according to the report. Trump had aides bring him boxes to sift through after a grand jury subpoena was issued in May, sources told the outlet.
New York University Law Prof. Ryan Goodman predicted that evidence of Trump disseminating national defense information "could put this case into [the] echelon of more serious charges under Espionage Act."
Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg agreed that Smith likely isn't asking about the map to build an obstruction case.
"I think the reason that they asked about the map is another statute, 18 USC 719 (e), 'The Espionage Statute,' says that someone who is unauthorized to have possession of a map and then shows it to someone who can't see it violates that statute," he told MSNBC. "So, they're not just going after him for obstruction, but also espionage, which is punishable by up to ten years in prison. That's why there's a lot of trouble ahead.
Attorney George Conway told MSNBC that the Mar-a-Lago case is "the shortest distance between Donald John Trump and an orange jumpsuit."
Well, maybe.Lol this wouldn't have any impact on the documents case
I don’t know, when he gets convicted for the documents, I’m still inclined that sentence will be house arrest. Like hardly any hardship for him in a golf resort.This and Georgia are the two cases where he might actually receive real punishment, if they are not delayed long enough for a republican to win the presidency and pardon him.
It's amusing though that some people think the hush money case will land Trump in prison. That's just funny.