There is a reason why they call it the right wing echo chamber..
Meaning the half truths/ lies bounce around enough that people believe them.
I don't know what you are attempting to say or imply here.
Is that like Oil Cancer?
So what do you think about those basic factual errors?your other source was already properly pilloried.
Again, why do you hold up the guy that got OJ acquitted, is largely shunned by his peers for being a drunken lunatic, raped teenage girls, and was very very good buddies with Epstein?
I notice you didn't really even mention it in your repsonse, just deflected to the other lunatic that you mentioned as "a source."
so does this mean that I convinced that Dershowitz isn't really a character that you want to champion as "clear minded" about important things?
You don’t have to take my word for it, you can see it yourself. One of your sources claimed Bragg didn’t say what the underlying crimes were until the trial but easily identifiable filings shows that’s not true.There is no argument here - your sources just said obviously wrong things. I already provided you proof of their falsity.I don't know what you are attempting to say or imply here.
Of course they did. I posted them as legal opinions from actual lawyers. Not prominent internet lawyers such as yourself and zinfamous.
It doesn't matter whoever I cite will be eviscerated by you and your minions even if you have to make shit up. Maybe the appeals court will ask you for your precious legal opinion on this before they decide.
Looks like you are wrong as usual.
Epstein victim drops her lawsuit against lawyer Alan Dershowitz
Virginia Giuffre had accused Dershowitz of being among the men who sexually abused her when she was a teenager.www.nbcnews.com
In a statement, Giuffre acknowledged that she may have made a mistake in identifying Dershowitz as one of her abusers.
"I have long believed that I was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to Alan Dershowitz," she said.
"However, I was very young at the time, it was a very stressful and traumatic environment, and Mr. Dershowitz has from the beginning consistently denied these allegations. I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz. This litigation has been very stressful and burdensome for me and my family, and we believe it is time to bring it to an end and move on with our lives."
Dershowitz also released a statement.
"As I have said from the beginning, I never had sex with Ms. Giuffre," it said. "I have nevertheless come to believe that at the time she accused me she believed what she said. Ms. Giuffre is to be commended for her courage in now stating publicly that she may have been mistaken about me."
What are you citing for calling him a drunk and a lunatic?
As for him defending OJ: As I read it he was a defense team member and a Defense Lawyer by trade. That was his Job. The defense didn't get OJ off the hook, the jury was going to let him go regardless due to the racial tension from the Rodney King beating.
Opinion: How Rodney King helped O.J. Simpson win a not-guilty verdict
After the King beating and the 1992 riots, the LAPD forfeited the city's trust. It isn't surprising that jurors would have their doubts about the case the department built against O.J. Simpson.www.latimes.com
it doesn't fit his narrativeYou don’t have to take my word for it, you can see it yourself. One of your sources claimed Bragg didn’t say what the underlying crimes were until the trial but easily identifiable filings shows that’s not true.There is no argument here - your sources just said obviously wrong things. I already provided you proof of their falsity.
Now that you know your sources said obviously wrong things do you want to reconsider anything?
Remember, the only question here is if you want to continue to rely on sources who said things that are obviously, provably wrong.
You don’t have to take my word for it, you can see it yourself. One of your sources claimed Bragg didn’t say what the underlying crimes were until the trial but easily identifiable filings shows that’s not true.There is no argument here - your sources just said obviously wrong things. I already provided you proof of their falsity.
Now that you know your sources said obviously wrong things do you want to reconsider anything?
Remember, the only question here is if you want to continue to rely on sources who said things that are obviously, provably wrong.
And this:
Biden Blames Delaware Oil Slicks for His Cancer and 'So Damn Many' Others
Biden suggested that his mother having to wipe "the oil slick off the window" before driving him to school as a child may have been tied to him developing cancer.www.newsweek.com
So what do you think about those basic factual errors?
are you seriously trying to compare those two claims as equal?
holy fuck, dude. How much diesel did you swallow when greasing your way through those submarine tubes?
And this:
Biden Blames Delaware Oil Slicks for His Cancer and 'So Damn Many' Others
Biden suggested that his mother having to wipe "the oil slick off the window" before driving him to school as a child may have been tied to him developing cancer.www.newsweek.com
Motor oil is a known carcinogen. While I’m sure that there’s potentially components of windmills that can cause cancer, spinning in the air and any one of them, lol.And this:
Biden Blames Delaware Oil Slicks for His Cancer and 'So Damn Many' Others
Biden suggested that his mother having to wipe "the oil slick off the window" before driving him to school as a child may have been tied to him developing cancer.www.newsweek.com
Yes, they are both stupid statements.
Massive uncontrolled industrial pollution in that era was kind of an actual thing.
Get out on the Cape…loads of Toyota trucks and SUV’s out there, especially the further down Cape you travel.Ohman… you would be in a constant state of amazement if you were to visit the Commonwealth.
Late model Ford pick up trucks with every option, late model Dodge Rams with every option, Chevy 2500s HD with every option. The lions share of them have fully tinted windows and aftermarket wheels and rims with lift kits. Anecdotally I don't see many Tundras or Tacomas.
I can understand why we have a lot of Ford pick ups driving around because of the two Ford manufacturing facilities here. Employee purchasing deals gotta be sweet AF!
Motor oil is a known carcinogen. While I’m sure that there’s potentially components of windmills that can cause cancer, spinning in the air and any one of them, lol.
I’d love to say I can’t believe you posted this as some sort of defense, but it’s not shocking, at all.
Remember, Trump and the cons scream about EPA overreach and constantly claim the air ‘s clean enough and water is, too. Just don’t remind them the reason the air and water appear clean enough is specifically due to the EPA…(Nixon’s creation…🙂)You say that like its a bad thing. Think of the corporate profits! My coworker is in favor of getting rid of all environmental protections because it "hurts business" and that the market will sort it all out, somehow punishing those that pollute (???? yeah, don't ask any "how, exactly" questions about that....). I know people that don't give a shit even if the pollution is there, because who gives a shit about the spotted titmouse. I could spell the word "ecology" for these people but that wouldn't matter, because humans aren't animals or part of a complicated web that every other living thing relies on for survival. Nope, we are mini-gods and big-G God has it all sorted for us.
Getting rid of pesky environmental laws is part of Maga. America was great when, and because, we could dump mercury and anything we wanted into waterways and landfills, saving us all (well, corporations) shit tons of money.
And if by some weird coincidence a bunch of people start developing cancer, they are probably poor people anyway since they chose to live near a factory, or downstream from one. Might even be minorities, extra don't-give-a-shit points there.
Only part of course, there's also the golden time when darkies couldn't vote, how awesome was that. And before we had so many mixed...."what are they" people that gum up the works.
No, the factual errors I listed in my post that were contained in the articles you used to support your position.These factual errors?
1.) got OJ acquitted.
2.) is largely shunned by his peers for being a drunken lunatic.
3.) raped teenage girls.
"a huge deal" - aka calling out your idiocy when making an ineffectual comparisonIt wasn't a defense it was a comparison of two silly statements. But go ahead and make a huge deal out of it if it makes you feel better.
Sure, I would be inclined to say that as well. What I'm not inclined to agree with is Trump claiming windmills cause cancer and Biden claiming pollution causes cancer are the same type of stupid statement. That's your both sides confirmation bias kicking in to protect your ego.I would be more inclined to think President Biden's skin cancer was caused by excessive sun exposure. Esp with all the time he spends at the beach.
It wasn't a defense it was a comparison of two silly statements. But go ahead and make a huge deal out of it if it makes you feel better.
I would be more inclined to think President Biden's skin cancer was caused by excessive sun exposure. Esp with all the time he spends at the beach.
ROFL. You expect him to read facts that conflict with his innate overwhelming knowledge based on feels?No, the factual errors I listed in my post that were contained in the articles you used to support your position.
That statement really reads like she was paid off...I don't know what you are attempting to say or imply here.
Of course they did. I posted them as legal opinions from actual lawyers. Not prominent internet lawyers such as yourself and zinfamous.
It doesn't matter whoever I cite will be eviscerated by you and your minions even if you have to make shit up. Maybe the appeals court will ask you for your precious legal opinion on this before they decide.
Looks like you are wrong as usual.
Epstein victim drops her lawsuit against lawyer Alan Dershowitz
Virginia Giuffre had accused Dershowitz of being among the men who sexually abused her when she was a teenager.www.nbcnews.com
In a statement, Giuffre acknowledged that she may have made a mistake in identifying Dershowitz as one of her abusers.
"I have long believed that I was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to Alan Dershowitz," she said.
"However, I was very young at the time, it was a very stressful and traumatic environment, and Mr. Dershowitz has from the beginning consistently denied these allegations. I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz. This litigation has been very stressful and burdensome for me and my family, and we believe it is time to bring it to an end and move on with our lives."
Dershowitz also released a statement.
"As I have said from the beginning, I never had sex with Ms. Giuffre," it said. "I have nevertheless come to believe that at the time she accused me she believed what she said. Ms. Giuffre is to be commended for her courage in now stating publicly that she may have been mistaken about me."
What are you citing for calling him a drunk and a lunatic?
As for him defending OJ: As I read it he was a defense team member and a Defense Lawyer by trade. That was his Job. The defense didn't get OJ off the hook, the jury was going to let him go regardless due to the racial tension from the Rodney King beating.
Opinion: How Rodney King helped O.J. Simpson win a not-guilty verdict
After the King beating and the 1992 riots, the LAPD forfeited the city's trust. It isn't surprising that jurors would have their doubts about the case the department built against O.J. Simpson.www.latimes.com
Um, oil and the products of its use cause a ton of different cancers. Wind mills in a field do not.Is that like Oil Cancer?