Again, from who? He’s not gaining any voters that didn’t vote for him in 2020This will earn him more votes next cycle.
Again, from who? He’s not gaining any voters that didn’t vote for him in 2020This will earn him more votes next cycle.
We can hopeIf he’s convicted on the felony counts he will go to prison. Looks like he’s in deep shit too as the hard part was always showing this was done to influence the election but apparently they have him asking if they delay the payment until after the election so they could stiff her as after the election it wouldn’t matter if it came out.
Again, you are underestimating the stupidity of iNDePeNdeNT voters. Especially as Biden's ratings continue to slowly crater.This is more Galaxy brain takes. Who exactly who didn’t vote for Trump in 2020 is going to vote for him in 2024 because he’s been indicted in over 30 felonies and counting?
Seriously, who are these people supposed to be?
Payment of hush money is not illegal.
When you fraudulently report it as campaign expense, it now isPayment of hush money is not illegal.
Payment of hush money is not illegal.
YupHave you even read anything on this case?
Which has to be proven. Remember...not guilty != innocent. Ive not heard anyone say he's innocent.When you fraudulently report it as campaign expense, it now is
Court of public opinion isn’t held to that standardWhich has to be proven. Remember...not guilty != innocent. Ive not heard anyone say he's innocent.
Trump isn’t indicted for paying hush money so that doesn’t matter.Payment of hush money is not illegal.
Which has to be proven. Remember...not guilty != innocent. Ive not heard anyone say he's innocent.
Haven’t we pretty conclusively proven but this point that I understand the electorate better than you? Haha.Again, you are underestimating the stupidity of iNDePeNdeNT voters. Especially as Biden's ratings continue to slowly crater.
But my comment is relevant to the post I replied to. Follow along.Trump isn’t indicted for paying hush money so that doesn’t matter.
His ratings went up but please dont concern yourself with facts.Again, you are underestimating the stupidity of iNDePeNdeNT voters. Especially as Biden's ratings continue to slowly crater.
And this seems important to me - he’s tying it to violations of New York election law. In the summary Bragg claims that he has Trump saying that he would like to hold the payment until after the election because then he could avoid paying her at all as after the election it wouldn’t matter if it came out.What we already know is that Cohen made a hush money payment, then Trump writes Cohen a series of checks over 9 months which "coincidentally" came to the exact same amount as the hush money payments. And Trump had them recorded in the leger as payment for legal services, without invoices from Cohen.
The main thing that remains in question is what underlying crime is Bragg relying on to make this a felony rather than a misdemeanor.
According to Cohen, he was actually paid $450,000 backWhat we already know is that Cohen made a hush money payment, then Trump writes Cohen a series of checks over 9 months which "coincidentally" came to the exact same amount as the hush money payments. And Trump had them recorded in the leger as payment for legal services, without invoices from Cohen.
And this seems important to me - he’s tying it to violations of New York election law. In the summary Bragg claims that he has Trump saying that he would like to hold the payment until after the election because then he could avoid paying her at all as after the election it wouldn’t matter if it came out.
It always seemed to me that proving the payments were to influence the election would be the hard part but if they can establish Trump said that it seems to go a long way to proving the underlying crime.
I was listening to the radio a few minutes ago and the 2 CNN reporters that were talking certainly did say that, from the documents they had read so far (which they admitted was not everything), this case was very thin.Ive been following this on CNN all morning, and the majority of panel members is similar: this is a weak case, and it likely will be dismissed.