Which is a ridiculously small amount given his ability to pay.BWAHAHAHA fined $10k for violating gag order again
While I would have preferred exponential increases, doubling is better than nothing.Which is a ridiculously small amount given his ability to pay.
This way, less room for appeals and more justification for da jail. Mmm the bigliest jailWhile I would have preferred exponential increases, doubling is better than nothing.
Meh, the money isn't fun. The jail time is going to be the entertainment!Which is a ridiculously small amount given his ability to pay.
They’d never jail him.You can only violate so many court orders and receive a fine. Violating a court order is also referred to as criminal contempt. Jail time for that is very light, like 5-10 days, but eventually it will happen if Trump can't keep his fat face shut.
Umm, doubling each time... is exponentialWhile I would have preferred exponential increases, doubling is better than nothing.
It would be hilarious! They need to put a webcam up if they do!They’d never jail him.
The total is now $15000, anyone for 20000 do I hear 20000....
It might not have happened if he didn't lie to the judge about who he was referring to in his out of court comment. He has some kind of hardon for the clerk.
It would be hilarious! They need to put a webcam up if they do!
Umm, doubling each time... is exponential
While I am certainly not a legal expert, I expect the standard for testimony will be lower for one’s child.Must see TV!
The tangerine terrorist sitting at the defendant’s table scowling at his princess, the apple of his eye…
Actually IF the Supreme Court did not issue partisan rulings like voiding the bipartisan and tough McCain-Feingold Act (ruling based on the bizarre concept that money is speech, along with the almost as equally concept that corporations have freedom of speech (it is a well admitted legal fiction that a corporation is a legal person, they can't vote-YET-and will never serve to defend this country) and other similar rulings (like the one giving valuable watches, expensive trips, etc. to politicians is not graft but is perfectly normal) then our campaign laws and general sense of ethics would be in a lot better shape.This makes no sense to me. Trump has lost shitloads of cases in the past and when he loses he pays. This is a trivial amount and he will pay it.
If the idea is he will try to tap campaign funds for that maybe, but honestly campaign finance laws are such a joke now anyway who cares. He would have used that money for something else anyway.
So yeah, he will pay.
That’s gonna be a lot of 5th pleading.
As trump was leaving a rally in NH a guy with a bullhorn was shouting "Trump's going to ja-il" and "Lock Him Up".
That’s gonna be a lot of 5th pleading.