ElMonoDelMar
Golden Member
- Apr 29, 2004
- 1,163
- 338
- 136
Did we just find the first conservative that admitted he's tired of all of the winning Trump promised?
I'm still confused on how the OP thinks banning bump-stocks is unconstitutional.
:face palm:
I might actually know their reasoning... from the Trump-a-doodles I know IRL.
See, some folks like to pretend that _everything_ the government does, not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution is somehow now allowed, and therefore unconstitutional. DoJ? unconstitutional. DoE? unconstitutional. Etc, etc.
In this case there's a parallel to the 2A, if one were to imagine infringe means "don't you dare touch firearms".
I know this P&N forum is filled with progressives who think guns are evil incarnate and banning them is the ultimate good (hint: it's not, and it hardly matters).
But with the bumpstock ban, Trump has managed to piss off both sides of the table and piss on the Constitution while doing it.
By the way, Dow Jones down 4% or so YTD. Tell me again how we're supposed to "win" this trade war?
False? What? Fox News tells him everyday how all them libuhrals wanna take his guns, open the borders wide to brown heathen folk, and put us all under the boot of socialism, and they would never tell lies!!You probably shouldn't have started from a false premise
I know this P&N forum is filled with progressives who think guns are evil incarnate and banning them is the ultimate good (hint: it's not, and it hardly matters).
But with the bumpstock ban, Trump has managed to piss off both sides of the table and piss on the Constitution while doing it.
By the way, Dow Jones down 4% or so YTD. Tell me again how we're supposed to "win" this trade war?
Discuss.
Great post but you got one tiny tiny thing wrong. This board is filled with conservatives. I'm about the only person here who is on the left. There are basically three conservative positions on guns, all of the ridiculous. 1. Guns guns and more guns. 2. So called sensible gun regulation, 3. Ban guns.I know this P&N forum is filled with progressives who think guns are evil incarnate and banning them is the ultimate good (hint: it's not, and it hardly matters).
But with the bumpstock ban, Trump has managed to piss off both sides of the table and piss on the Constitution while doing it.
By the way, Dow Jones down 4% or so YTD. Tell me again how we're supposed to "win" this trade war?
Discuss.
I'm betting he will make a deal. "We'll stay, you don't impeach me." "And throw in a wall."Speaking of pissing everyone off, Trump declares to the surprise of everyone that's we're getting out of Syria. Republicans caught off guard so expect Trump to never have suggested it tomorrow
Great post but you got one tiny tiny thing wrong. This board is filled with conservatives. I'm about the only person here who is on the left. There are basically three conservative positions on guns, all of the ridiculous. 1. Guns guns and more guns. 2. So called sensible gun regulation, 3. Ban guns.
Number 1 is a good way to shoot yourself in the foot. Nobody has any idea what reasonable means, and 3 means only criminals will have guns.
Nope, all ridiculous. The right answer and the only true liberal answer is to totally get rid of people. It's people who kill people not guns. That's what I'm for.
Did we just find the first conservative that admitted he's tired of all of the winning Trump promised?
So they should also be pissed that fully automatic rifles, grenade launchers and heat seeking missiles aren't allowed too?
I'd feel a lot more secure with a full auto M4 &M203 grenade launcher handy, particularly with a double drum 100 round magazine & laser sight. I can only imagine the feeling of freedom it would give me.
Good point. I'll have to move even more left and hope the sun goes nova.Well that's what the conservatives are for too (see: climate change denial). So you are one of us too.
Beg to differ.
I want a M1 Abrams parked in my driveway, at least until I can complete digging the silo that will contain my cruise missile.