MixMasterTang
Diamond Member
- Jul 23, 2001
- 3,167
- 176
- 106
But then Trump has a woody for dictators because he wants to be one himself. That much is entirely clear.
I think he prefers the term "King" instead of dictator.
But then Trump has a woody for dictators because he wants to be one himself. That much is entirely clear.
If only people were so up in arms when our current president tossed out due process rights when killing a US citizen that was labeled a terrorist.
Trump Praises Saddam Hussein, Paul Ryan Does Damage Control
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...sein-paul-ryan-does-damage-control?int=a14709
Hey, Vlad and Kim are great, great guys too, they are just a little misunderstood.
If only people were so up in arms when our current president tossed out due process rights when killing a US citizen that was labeled a terrorist.
Saddam executed everyone without due process. Not just terrorists. The fact some might have been terrorists pales in comparison to the number of women, children and just objectors who were slaughtered over the decades. The man used chemical weapons against his own citizens as a method for dealing with what he viewed as terrorists.
I think plenty of people were up in arms about that. I know I was.
That being said, drone strikes on US citizens has been used as a last resort to the best of my knowledge. In this case Trump is saying that ignoring constitutional protections is the preferred method, not the exception. Much, much more dangerous.
How is he technically correct?
In fairness to Trump, and I say this with displeasure, the fact is that the Middle East has only known strongmen and in the absence of a strongman another strongman will arise. We kill Saddam and the next thing you know ISIS is running the show. We support the overthrow of Qaddafi and the power vacuum is filled by someone as bad or worse.
If it were possible, and it is not, I'd build a wall around the region and let them end there own miserable existence. So long as they kept there beheadings to themselves I'd reluctantly say goodbye and good riddance...
Brian
In fairness to Trump, and I say this with displeasure, the fact is that the Middle East has only known strongmen and in the absence of a strongman another strongman will arise. We kill Saddam and the next thing you know ISIS is running the show. We support the overthrow of Qaddafi and the power vacuum is filled by someone as bad or worse.
I think plenty of people were up in arms about that. I know I was.
That being said, drone strikes on US citizens has been used as a last resort to the best of my knowledge. In this case Trump is saying that ignoring constitutional protections is the preferred method, not the exception. Much, much more dangerous.
Uhm, praising methods of repressing terrorism that are blatantly unconstitutional is pretty gross, no?
Also, Obama did not remove our troops from Iraq. That was due to an agreement that the Bush administration signed that Iraq would not budge on. Unless you wanted us to reoccupy Iraq that is.
Saddam, like many of his ilk, was a strongman that did not tolerate anyone that could be a threat to him. He was brutal in this way, but that kept Al Qaeda and others at bay. He ruled with force and tens of thousands died during his 24 year reign. In half that time something over a quarter million people have died as a result of our insanely stupid actions. By comparison with Bush/Cheney Saddam was benign...
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/06/opinions/trump-comments-on-saddam-opinion-bergen/index.html
Brian