Indus
Lifer
- May 11, 2002
- 11,640
- 8,091
- 136
He did break the law though.
Multiple counts of littering.
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
Littering and..
He did break the law though.
Multiple counts of littering.
I'm not so sure of that, at least so far that it would affect the election results. The death of one treasonous, fascist asshole is not going to make millions of Americans suddenly not care about about losing their country and civil rights. We'd probably see big parties nationwide, "The biggest threat to democracy since the Civil War is gone, ceeeeel-librate tonight, C'MON!"
Women still mostly hate the guy. He thinks Taylor Swift's support is irrelevant, that she "won't move the needle." I guess someone neglected to inform that greasy dipshit that Swift commands crowds big enough to move seismograph needles, in multiple countries.
And then this morning, "I hate Taylor Swift." Hahaha, sounds like someone explained things to shithead.
Trump suddenly not being in the picture would lead to chaos in magaland. His hollow empire collapses while all his shiteating cronies (and family) turn on each other fighting for scraps and places of prominence. I wouldn't expect political success and advancement out of that.
Good thing the Internet doesn't forget.Elon would like to share his own hot take:
View attachment 107661
He seems to have deleted it though.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-faces-firestorm-over-075927471.html
Elon would like to share his own hot take:
View attachment 107661
He seems to have deleted it though.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-faces-firestorm-over-075927471.html
Hmmm, fair points - I don't really know. Just instinctively think that shooting one guy is never going to achieve anything good.
It _could_ lead to splits and endless infighting among all the slightly-different MAGA factions, who currently have a single figurehead to unite behind.
But it could also motivate less-enthused and currently-slightly-less-fanatical-Republicans by convincing them there really _is_ an evil Democrat conspiracy to 'get' them and a danger from Antifa/the far left, and thus they need to put aside any doubts and rally behind whoever the new hard-right flag-bearer turns out to be (especially if any such assassin turns out to be clearly of the left, rather than a confused paradoxically-right-wing crazy person).
It's certainly likely to confirm the worst imaginings of the hard-core extremists, and thus increase the likelihood of them acting on their beliefs.
Anyone but himselfOf course Trump is blaming Biden and Harris
Not supporting the idea of assassinating political candidates, but dammit...if these idiots are going to shoot at Trump...I kind of wish they'd git er done right instead of feeding his legend...and giving him bumps in the polls.
You’d think they could just go back to 2016 and tell Hillary to campaign in Michigan a bit more.
If he gets a competent attorney, and doesn't talk to police without them, I don't think they have any basis to charge him that has been revealed so far. Which just points out how completely messed up our gun laws are in the U.S.
Sheriffs are generally elected. So the sheriff will generally be as crazy as the electorate.What an asshole, and spoken like a magat. He shouldn't have that job, obviously.
Up there on the list of things for a functioning government to attend to is doing something about America's entitled sheriff problem. Their delusions wrt Constitutional rights must be addressed and American communities need an effective way to remove sheriffs that are unfit for office.
Glad those background checks kept him from buying a gun.Just saw on the news the guy is actually a convicted felon.
So, he's fucked.
Just saw on the news the guy is actually a convicted felon.
So, he's fucked.
Sheriffs are generally elected. So the sheriff will generally be as crazy as the electorate.
I'd also note Republicans have been working like mad for years across multiple jurisdictions and courts working to overturn laws prohibiting ex-felons from possessing gunsYeah, the only thing it seems they got him on (so far) is gun charges. It'll be stretch to charge anything else based on FL non-existent gun laws.
Meanwhile looks like someone has had too many diet cokes. Caffeine and Trump don’t go well together.
View attachment 107667
Literally the self-awareness of a child. We all know he’s the master of projection but damn he’s thick.
Does anyone know what these false statements were made by Kamala? Because I don’t recall any. And certainly not related to the whole Haitian lie. So my conclusion is he’s literally lying about a lie.
And talk about rhetoric, “unpardonable sin” which is just magnificently rich, and obviously the asinine communist trope isn’t great but that’s just standard now.
It’s Truth Social, and yeah it’s because he’s a fucking idiot.Is that a tweet? (or whatever things on "x" are called - eXcreta?) Or is it from his Twitter-knockoff site? Seems a bit long for Twitter.
And what's with his weird approach to the use of capital letters? He starts off capitalising words seemingly at random ("Rhetoric" "Lies" "Debate" "Political Opponent") and then starts capitalizing entire words at random, before eventually just hitting the caps-lock.
I'm pretty sure that pinkish (I'm terrible with colors) checkmark means it's his Truth Social platform.Is that a tweet? (or whatever things on "x" are called - eXcreta?) Or is it from his Twitter-knockoff site? Seems a bit long for Twitter.
ThisElon would like to share his own hot take:
View attachment 107661
He seems to have deleted it though.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-faces-firestorm-over-075927471.html
Meanwhile looks like someone has had too many diet cokes. Caffeine and Trump don’t go well together.
View attachment 107667
Literally the self-awareness of a child. We all know he’s the master of projection but damn he’s thick.
Does anyone know what these false statements were made by Kamala? Because I don’t recall any. And certainly not related to the whole Haitian lie. So my conclusion is he’s literally lying about a lie.
And talk about rhetoric, “unpardonable sin” which is just magnificently rich, and obviously the asinine communist trope isn’t great but that’s just standard now.
Today you really got hung up on these little bits of language where the intent is crystal clear to everyone.I find the terminology of all this quite peculiar. So here's "the President" thanking God that "the President" is OK.
I get that former presidents are still referred to as "President" (weird though that is, in itself), but why do they still get the definite article? They can't all be the President, surely by definition only one of them is the President. The others are merely "Presidents" and any one of them would be "a President".
Surely he means "thank God that other President's OK"?
View attachment 107657
[Edit] I mean, no wonder Trump gets so confused as to whether Biden, Obama or Donald himself is currently in charge. The terminology really can't help when someone's as old and demented as Trump.
Two thingsMeanwhile looks like someone has had too many diet cokes. Caffeine and Trump don’t go well together.
View attachment 107667
Literally the self-awareness of a child. We all know he’s the master of projection but damn he’s thick.
Does anyone know what these false statements were made by Kamala? Because I don’t recall any. And certainly not related to the whole Haitian lie. So my conclusion is he’s literally lying about a lie.
And talk about rhetoric, “unpardonable sin” which is just magnificently rich, and obviously the asinine communist trope isn’t great but that’s just standard now.