I'll agree voter turnout for Dems can be improved, but in the last presidential election there was 3million more Dems who did
It was maybe more than a decade ago, but I'd found a statistic that showed something toward 180 million Americans who were registered or eligible to vote -- but don't. I don't trust my own memory of stale information. But this analysis was done in wake of the 2016 election:
While election officials are still tabulating ballots, the 126 million votes already counted means about 55% of voting age citizens cast ballots this year.
That measure of turnout is the lowest in a presidential election since 1996, when 53.5% of voting-age citizens turned out.
I've met younger people before who were brazenly smug about "not following news, not caring, not participating." The information-deficit could be expected to argue "fake news, anyway" even if they vote. When I encounter such people -- and they don't look "homeless" -- I have this sudden desire to look for "tracks" on their arms or between their toes.
But it has been known for a long time that there is untapped potential among the non-voting eligible. The GOP has already struck the bottom of their share of the barrel -- they need the neo-Nazis and the racists. And the GOP has always feared surging turnouts, which cause them to lose. That's why the mousey-twit in the Trump focus-group in 2016 was compelled to say "there were 3 million fraudulent votes in 2016 because California had 3 million illegal immigrants . . . " They either attend to voter-suppression at the functionally-literate upper-tier of their organization and candidate-officials, or they spread this nonsense around to the galactically-brainless, like the focus-group twit.
America has lost its greatness or never had all of its potential, and we can see the dark cultural underbelly -- if not outright un-American, then hilariously ignorant -- which is the millstone around the neck of the human race and America as well. With that, there is nothing funny about it.