Either you made up your own definition of corruption where people making money after they've been in office somehow counts or you lied about the Clintons. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Maybe both, but either way you have totally shit your pants in this thread.
Again, I was taking what you said. You seemed to think Trump running a business is corruption, full stop. No bribery has been shown, so I had to assume your definition of "corruption" merely meant doing business while holding the office of the president.
Anyone get a close look at that check? Is date correct? Someone get a copy of the Park Service accounting records so we can see the deposit. For all we know Trump ordered them not to cash.
That wasn't actually his paycheck...it was a forged copy of Obama's birth certificate retrieved from a mayonnaise jar kept on Funk and Wagnalls' porch!
Neither Clinton would have met this definition, meaning either your previous posts accusing others of a double standard were stupid or you're lying now.
Providing a service for money is certainly a business. Speeches qualify. You must really be doing some serious mental acrobatics if you think otherwise.
In your mind...yes, I can now see that this kind of claptrap would trouble you deeply.Anyone get a close look at that check? Is date correct? Someone get a copy of the Park Service accounting records so we can see the deposit. For all we know Trump ordered them not to cash.
And yes the number of Trump lies warrants these kind of questions.
For like the fifth time, neither Clinton got money for speeches while in public office. How are you not understanding this.
In your mind...yes, I can now see that this kind of claptrap would trouble you deeply.
While the majority of the sheets were hidden, some of them were visible – and there was no sign of page numbers or the sticky notes that lawyers tend to use to mark places in large documents.
The paper itself also appeared to be the wrong size, printed on A4 rather than legal size sheets, and appears to have fallen like fresh sheets of paper. And the folders themselves were also entirely blank, despite Mr. Trump suggesting that each of them related to a different business that Mr. Trump was moving himself away from.
Based on the reading comprehension he's demonstrated in this thread, I doubt he has the mental capacity. He's already demonstrated he doesn't understand the difference between ownership and management. He's demonstrated that he thinks one spouse shares the same job as the other spouse. He's demonstrated a basic lack of understanding of time, and that timing of events can influence whether an action is ethical or not. Basically, his intellectual ability seems to be at the level of, "If it says something good about Trump, its true, if it says something bad about Trump, its false. If it says something good about a democrat, its false, if it says something bad about a democrat, its true."For like the fifth time, neither Clinton got money for speeches while in public office. How are you not understanding this.
OK. Now to complete the comparison, what service is Trump providing, personally, for money, while in office?
Hint: he is not running his hotels personally.
If you actually look at things with an unbiased mind, I think you will find that Hillary's indirect profit through Bill's speeches is the exact same thing as Trump's indirect profit due to business ownership.
OK. Now to complete the comparison, what service is Trump providing, personally, for money, while in office?
Hint: he is not running his hotels personally.
If you actually look at things with an unbiased mind, I think you will find that Hillary's indirect profit through Bill's speeches is the exact same thing as Trump's indirect profit due to business ownership.
UNPROVEN means UNPROVEN.I mean the last time they used a press conference to show Trump providing some documents it's reasonably likely all of the documents in question were blank. Not proven, but reasonably likely.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-busted-using-empty-folders/
Based on the reading comprehension he's demonstrated in this thread, I doubt he has the mental capacity. He's already demonstrated he doesn't understand the difference between ownership and management. He's demonstrated that he thinks one spouse shares the same job as the other spouse. He's demonstrated a basic lack of understanding of time, and that timing of events can influence whether an action is ethical or not.
Basically, his intellectual ability seems to be at the level of, "If it says something good about Trump, its true, if it says something bad about Trump, its false. If it says something good about a democrat, its false, if it says something bad about a democrat, its true."
Except Hillary isn't President, Donald is. If Hillary had been making scratch from Bill's speeches while she was President, you might have an argument.
I mean the last time they used a press conference to show Trump providing some documents it's reasonably likely all of the documents in question were blank. Not proven, but reasonably likely.
http://www.snopes.com/trump-busted-using-empty-folders/
So you admit Hillary is corrupt, but a corrupt Secretary of State isn't as bad as a corrupt president, is that it?
UNPROVEN means UNPROVEN.
Are you fucking kidding me.
It's not indirect profit due to business ownership, it's 100% direct profit due to business ownership. It is a privately held company where the sole beneficiary is Donald J. Trump. .
1) Not on legal paper.
The reality here is that you don't know. Why don't you just stick to facts for a change instead of wading into this kind of horseshit innuendo? It makes you look pathetic.And 'reasonably likely' means 'reasonably likely'.
I'm sure you can come up with tons of good reasons as to why those legal documents separating Trump from his businesses were:
1) Not on legal paper.
2) In entirely blank and unlabeled folders.
3) Showing no signs of any sticky notes or anything else.
I'm sure there was also a really good reason why the administration repeatedly refused press requests to even look at any of the contents of any folder too.
lol. Nothing about it makes sense. The most likely answer is that they were fakes.
Almost spilled my drink. You are so fucking dumb I can't control myself when I read your posts.
"Your honor, the speeding ticket is invalid: it wasn't provided on a standard TOPS legal pad!"
Almost spilled my drink. You are so fucking dumb I can't control myself when I read your posts.
"Your honor, the speeding ticket is invalid: it wasn't provided on a standard TOPS legal pad!"
The reality here is that you don't know. Why don't you just stick to facts for a change instead of wading in this kind of horseshit innuendo? It makes you look pathetic.