Since when does declining to offer proof of something mean it didn't happen? If you choose to think he lied and won't be donating his salary, that's up to you but this is a complete non-story. More noise that drowns out rational discussion.
How are you able to trust ANYTHING he says?
You have your panties in a wad over something that is a non-issue. It is his money to do with as he pleases as long as he doesn't break any law.
Explain to me how it's different with Democrats.Trumpettes only care about the truth when it involves people or ideology not matching their own....which is basically how many lies can you get away with, you know....corporate american style.
Explain to me how it's different with Democrats.
Can you at least admit that if true, then it is a lie and a wrong thing for Trump to do?Explain to me how it's different with Democrats.
It's different with both Republican's not for Trump and Democrats.
Trumpettes are willing accepting straight up lies at this point. Google is your friend.
So, here are the facts: we don't know if he donated his salary or not. If he hasn't, we don't know when he's going to do it, or not do it.
Rrrrrraaaaaaggeee!
I agree with double trouble, you idiots keep raging about this kind of nonsense and then act surprised and dismayed when real news comes up and people simply ignore it because they start tuning out the noise.
See, this is why any type of meaningful interaction here is pointless. 0bama told lie after lie after lie and his ardent supporter ate them all up with a big smile. Dem's ran Hillary who has been termed a congenital liar. I would term her as a pathological liar. Fool yourself if you want, it's no skin off my nose.It's different with both Republican's not for Trump and Democrats.
Trumpettes are willing accepting straight up lies at this point. Google is your friend.
So, here are the facts: we don't know if he donated his salary or not. If he hasn't, we don't know when he's going to do it, or not do it.
Rrrrrraaaaaaggeee!
I agree with double trouble, you idiots keep raging about this kind of nonsense and then act surprised and dismayed when real news comes up and people simply ignore it because they start tuning out the noise.
It's just more TDS. They'd go apeshit over the way Trump wipes his ass if they information about it.So, here are the facts: we don't know if he donated his salary or not. If he hasn't, we don't know when he's going to do it, or not do it.
Rrrrrraaaaaaggeee!
I agree with double trouble, you idiots keep raging about this kind of nonsense and then act surprised and dismayed when real news comes up and people simply ignore it because they start tuning out the noise.
See, this is why any type of meaningful interaction here is pointless. 0bama told lie after lie after lie and his ardent supporter ate them all up with a big smile. Dem's ran Hillary who has been termed a congenital liar. I would term her as a pathological liar. Fool yourself if you want, it's no skin off my nose.
See, this is why any type of meaningful interaction here is pointless. 0bama told lie after lie after lie and his ardent supporter ate them all up with a big smile. Dem's ran Hillary who has been termed a congenital liar. I would term her as a pathological liar. Fool yourself if you want, it's no skin off my nose.
But White House scholars and other students of government agree there has never been a president like Donald Trump, whose volume of falsehoods, misstatements and serial exaggerations — on matters large and wincingly small — place him “in a class by himself,” as Texas A&M’s George Edwards put it.
“He is by far the most mendacious president in American history,” said Edwards, a political scientist who edits the scholarly journal Presidential Studies Quarterly. (His assessment takes in the whole of Trump’s hyperbolic history, as the former real estate developer and reality TV personality has only been in office since Jan. 20.)
Edwards then amended his assertion.
“I say ‘mendacious,’ which implies that he’s knowingly lying. That may be unfair,” Edwards said. “He tells more untruths than any president in American history.”
The caveat underscores the fraught use of the L-word, requiring, as it does, the certainty that someone is consciously presenting something as true that they know to be false. While there may be plenty of circumstantial evidence to suggest a person is lying, short of crawling inside their head it is difficult to say with absolutely certainty.
When Trump incessantly talks of rampant voter fraud, boasts about the size of his inaugural audience or claims to have seen thousands of people on rooftops in New Jersey celebrating the Sept. 11 attacks, all are demonstrably false. “But who can say if he actually believes it,” asked Lewis, “or whether he’s gotten the information from some less-than-reliable news site?”
Trump is in a class by himself. No president in history is remotely similar.
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trump-presidential-lies-2017-story.html
It's just more TDS. They'd go apeshit over the way Trump wipes his ass if they information about it.
It's comical on one level but it's somewhat concerning on a bigger level. It's not normal to fixate on something as trivial as this. Especially when it comes from a media with an agenda as obvious as it can be.
It's snowing here.Dude, that doesn't mean anything. I didn't vote for Hillary either. Hillary lost and the guy who is responsible for the Office is no one but Trump. I can't fault anyone if I don't hold everyone to the same equal standard. Trump is failing. History is another matter.
I hate Trump as much as anyone (well, maybe not as much as Melania, but that's a different topic). I read this article this morning and I admit, I'm not going to go off the deep end on this one.... yet.
The donation could still be forthcoming at year end or quarter end etc. It would not shock me if he didn't' donate the salary and income from his hotels as he promised -- he's broken a million promises already so these "minor" ones wouldn't shock me. I will wait until the dust settles before I cast stones at him on this.
PS: He's still a useless bag of skin.
PPS: A SMART person and/or administration would have made it public as soon as he received that first check and made a news article about him donating it. It could have even been an exclusive of Fox and Friends!
Yeah, that's probably it. Have you ever heard people refer to you as a savant?Trump was the asshole bragging about donating his salary. Something he clearly intends NOT to do. He wants the credit for things he says he going to do without regard to whether he does them or not. It could all be a smokescreen to distract America while he dismantles everything. If so, it is working to perfection.
Reporting like this is important because it has actually worked in the past. If you read his history of 'charitable giving' you see that in many (most?) instances he would pledge money, reap the good publicity, and then never actually donate. It was just another scam.
Last year when he pledged a million dollars to veterans charities he never actually followed through until the media uncovered that he hadn't donated a dime. Then of course he conveniently donated the money a few days later and proclaimed that had been the plan all along. (Lol) Without good reporting those charities would probably still be waiting for that money.
Yeah, that's probably it. Have you ever heard people refer to you as a savant?
What's really a shame is that so many can't read an article and identify the bias within it. Can't comprehend where the line exists between factual reporting and partisan spin. Point out where in the article in the OP says that Trump has not donated his salary and for bonus points where Trump (or one of his reps) says he won't. The article insinuates (you can look that word up if you need to) things, the question is why you have decided to interpret them the way you do.
This could be a big deal for you. Best of luck.
Yeah, that's probably it. Have you ever heard people refer to you as a savant?
What's really a shame is that so many can't read an article and identify the bias within it. Can't comprehend where the line exists between factual reporting and partisan spin. Point out where in the article in the OP says that Trump has not donated his salary and for bonus points where Trump (or one of his reps) says he won't. The article insinuates (you can look that word up if you need to) things, the question is why you have decided to interpret them the way you do.
This could be a big deal for you. Best of luck.