NEVER, he has only the best ideas, the best brain. He has a great temperament and he wins so much he is never tired of winning.
Sack up and admit defeat LK...
I have provided the links. You guys just refuse to see them as valid.You've been asked several times to provide actual proof of these claims and have refused to do so. And you call everyone else sock puppets? You don't have any credibility to try and stand on your own word here.
So his own writings, numerous citations, his actual body of work, show that he does. Why is he disavowing it now?
Why remove his website which touts a system fraught with abuse to bring in muslim immigrants?
Hmm....
The Muslim attorney writes that, it has to be admitted, however, that the Quran, being basically a book of religious guidance, is not an easy reference for legal studies. It is more particularly an appeal to faith and the human soul rather than a classification of legal prescriptions. Khan added that, the major portion of the Quran is, as with every Holy Book, a code of divine exhortation and moral principals.
I have provided the links. You guys just refuse to see them as valid.
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016...nowned-expert-on-sharia-not-the-constitution/
I am sure you'll refute the site and not the text or the guys own words.
I have provided the links [sic]. You guys just refuse to see them as valid.
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016...nowned-expert-on-sharia-not-the-constitution/
I am sure you'll refute the site and not the text or the guys own words.
So then how do you rectify the difference between his own words? Both are *his words*Numerous citations, his actual body of work? He's not disavowing anything now, he's explaining what your trash sites tried to smear him with. All these "numerous citations" basically go back to a 13-page article, which was published in the Houston Journal of International Law.
In the journal article, Khan goes on to explain the importance of Islamic laws and interpretations to Muslim followers. He writes this below, which was buried in an article that basically tried to demonize him:
^^^ These are HIS OWN WORDS ON THE SUBJECT, PUBLISHED IN THE Houston Journal of International Law IN 1983 , as opposed to the wholesale smears and weasel insinuations.
Guess I need to use vox and jezebel.You really should stop with just referencing breitbart non stop and get a clue. You're brainwashed.
So then how do you rectify the difference between his own words? Both are *his words*
Ohh sure, the appeal to faith, been there and done that. There is no separation of church and state when it comes to the bulk of islamic states.
Guess I need to use vox and jezebel.
Let's back up a second. LK completely dodged a question. Even if Kahn was in favor of Sharia Law, how does that excuse Trump's behavior in any way? LK, the Sharia stuff is just to divert the discussion. We can talk about it later, actually, it doesn't matter. Khan isn't running for President. Let's try to focus on the issue, can we? The issue is Trump's response. Certainly, you're not going to say that Trump knew that Khan was pro-Sharia Law (there's no real evidence of that)?
So then how do you rectify the difference between his own words? Both are *his words*
Ohh sure, the appeal to faith, been there and done that. There is no separation of church and state when it comes to the bulk of islamic states.
Let's back up a second. LK completely dodged a question. Even if Kahn was in favor of Sharia Law, how does that excuse Trump's behavior in any way? LK, the Sharia stuff is just to divert the discussion. We can talk about it later, actually, it doesn't matter. Khan isn't running for President. Let's try to focus on the issue, can we? The issue is Trump's response. Certainly, you're not going to say that Trump knew that Khan was pro-Sharia Law (there's no real evidence of that)?
Even if Kahn was in favor of Sharia Law, how does that excuse Trump's behavior in any way?
COOPER: Let me ask you, just yesterday an official adviser on Veteran's Affairs just the guy who was referencing before and the Trump campaign Al Baldasaro tweeted out this. He said, he tweeted out a link to a blog post which essentially accuses you of being a Muslim brotherhood agent who wants to advance Sharia Law in the United States adding that you used your son as a political pawn. I want you to be able to respond to that.
KHAN: Yeah. And I hope his surrogates are listening so they can take note of it what I'm about to say. I have no concern, I have no link, I have never been of that thought of that. I assure you I am an educated person. There is and I hope that other not so thoughtful Republican leaders are listening, there is constitutional amendment in the constitution of United States and that is called equal protection of law under 14th Amendment. Sharia Law as we have titled, there is no such thing as Sharia Law.
These are laws of various Muslim countries which are hodgepodge of British laws, French laws, Portuguese laws. In there, there is tremendous discrimination of genders which disqualifies them under the constitution of the United States, cannot be implemented, cannot be brought. How can I be a person that has read this, I preach that, that I do not stand for any Sharia Law because there is no such thing.
The Muslim attorney writes that, it has to be admitted, however, that the Quran, being basically a book of religious guidance, is not an easy reference for legal studies. It is more particularly an appeal to faith and the human soul rather than a classification of legal prescriptions. Khan added that, the major portion of the Quran is, as with every Holy Book, a code of divine exhortation and moral principals.
oops. Someone got owned.
Nope, the evil lame stream media is biased and is not reporting the TRUTH the TRUTH I tell you. Its all about the TRUTH that only breitbart knows.
The current race is which of these two is the more unacceptable, because right now neither of them is acceptable, Gingrich said in a Wednesday morning telephone interview. Trump is helping her to win by proving he is more unacceptable than she is.
This gif represents the unease we liberals feel when dealing with ultra right echo chamber. Barely able to look for fear of angering this lumbering mass of limbs and vitamin d deficient pale skin.
Notice how the ultra right wing members are marching out of step. This represents the fragmentation of the party and the people. They are even wearing gas masks now that their paranoia of having a sharia law transvestite supreme court justice is almost upon them.
LK any thoughts on this recent Newt Gingrich quote?
LK any thoughts on this recent Newt Gingrich quote?
And why do you keep thinking that a know sharia sympathizer is anything but a sock puppet sent to attack trump in an opportunistic fashion. this guy isn't some random grieving father. He is a DC insider. It was a setup and you guys are gleefully cheering it on.