Explain why anything you wrote excuses Trump smearing the mother of a dead soldier by way of her religion. Until you do that I won't answer a single thing.
Shift what? You can't even read his own words?
Is Islam noted for its mistreatment of women.
Yes or no answer.
Unfortunately for you, I do read what I link,
I didn't make any claims other than what I have made.
Explain why anything you wrote excuses Trump smearing the mother of a dead soldier by way of her religion. Until you do that I won't answer a single thing.
This is what I don't get, people who are saying Khan was a plant or whatever are implicitly admitting that the DNC has already figured out how to play Trump like a fiddle by using his thin skin and narcissism. That's really not better, as foreign countries would figure that out in a second too.
In the very same paper you are quoting, he mentions why sharia is not compatible with the US constitution and should not be tolerated here.
But why argue with you? You are taking the 3rd grade deflect, victim blame, blow your nose when someone else intrudes on your safe space.
This was never about Khan. This is about MicroMussolini being a colossal douchenozzle on top of being wholly incompetent for the position he pretends to be running for.
Explain why anything you wrote excuses Trump smearing the mother of a dead soldier by way of her religion. Until you do that I won't answer a single thing.
If you wont' read the source, you can read a summary of some of the evidence against him.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/khan-thinks-sharia-trumps-u-s-constitution/
He does not say in the essay that "sharia should not be tolerated here".
His sympathies are clearly not "progressive" to say the least.
As for the general quality of the replies.
This seems more and more true.
The Truth About The Fall of Rome: Modern Parallels
Stefan Molyneux
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7rdCYCQ_U
I had not, what Khan said in his essay were his own words, which imply a contradiction between the image he portrayed at the DNC and what he actually believes.
Never mind the man now owns 10 properties, "business" is good.
As for the mother, this is hypocrisy because the left likely would have made the same charge if it were the other way around.
Don't even pretend that religion doesn't have a notable track record of actual sexism and misogyny.
The faux concern, the insincerity on all aspects of this pseudo scandal created by the left simply insults everyones intelligence when its clear it was a cynical political move from the get go. Perhaps Trump shouldn't have taken the bait, but in the end, this was just shameless political maneuvering from a man with less than clean motives for using the death of his son as a vector for political attack.
So, Khan shouldn't have worn that dress, or what?
If you wont' read the source, you can read a summary of some of the evidence against him.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/khan-thinks-sharia-trumps-u-s-constitution/
He does not say in the essay that "sharia should not be tolerated here".
His sympathies are clearly not "progressive" to say the least.
Basically he expressed concern over her silence based on her religions well known track record of silencing women.
Get over yourself.
This is what I mean when these attacks are insincere.
The party of "feminism" is now feigning concern over offending Islam when if the situations were flipped those would be their first thoughts as well, give me a break.
As for the general quality of the replies.
This seems more and more true.
The Truth About The Fall of Rome: Modern Parallels
Stefan Molyneux
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7rdCYCQ_U
Are you comparing religious garb to slut walks?
If so feminists need to keep their mouths shut over Saudi Arabia.
I'm comparing your defense of Trump to a common defense of rapists. Seems to fit pretty well, huh?
Basically he expressed concern over her silence based on her religions well known track record of silencing women.
Get over yourself.
This is what I mean when these attacks are insincere.
The party of "feminism" is now feigning concern over offending Islam when if the situations were flipped those would be their first thoughts as well, give me a break.
If you wont' read the source, you can read a summary of some of the evidence against him.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/khan-thinks-sharia-trumps-u-s-constitution/
He does not say in the essay that "sharia should not be tolerated here".
His sympathies are clearly not "progressive" to say the least.
When you've done something wrong, something that so many people find indefensible, it's usually better to say, "I'm wrong, I'm sorry" and it's the end of the issue. But you seem to find it an admirable trait to attack people who disagree with you, even when you're wrong? No wonder you like Trump. I didn't think people with your reasoning existed; now I know better.Guys who are trying to argue and say Trump should not have attacked Khan; are you really dense? Why would you NOT want Trump to go after Khan??
I really don't get some of you. There is a time and place where you only watch the meltdown without trying to prevent it or cause it.
STOP.
Lifezette ?
Donald Trump, Party of 1
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-08-03/donald-trump-is-the-lone-ranger-candidate?int=a14709
"Trump is Trump," observes John Noonan, a former national security aide to Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush who has sworn off voting for the GOP nominee this year. "You can pull somebody out of the insane asylum and staff him with the best people in the business, and he's still going to be in the parking lot screaming about the book of Revelations and there's nothing you can do about it. Hillary's the placekicker on the field. She's shanking every kick. And Trump's the guy pleasuring himself in the stands."
You just don't get it. I do NOT want anybody to stop Trump from self-destructing. He is doing a great job at it.When you've done something wrong, something that so many people find indefensible, it's usually better to say, "I'm wrong, I'm sorry" and it's the end of the issue. But you seem to find it an admirable trait to attack people who disagree with you, even when you're wrong? No wonder you like Trump. I didn't think people with your reasoning existed; now I know better.
In related news, I keep seeing that damned gamergate thread and wondering why the hell it's been going on forever. Ohhhhhh, now I get it.
You just don't get it. I do NOT want anybody to stop Trump from self-destructing. He is doing a great job at it.
You on the other hand, are trying to prevent him digging himself in.
Tell me, do you want Trump to relent and pretend to be sane person?
I wonder why??
The funny thing about you ...
You have the ...
Because you've become ...
Some folks want everyone to do "the right thing".
Like telling a crazy person to put some clothes on and stop flinging !@#$ on the walls. Maybe if they can... improve... then you've made the world a slightly better place...
This isn't about me and you don't know me from jack shit so fuck off. I'm not the one who is coming here to spew intolerance and lies, you are. What you write about tells everyone who and what you are and in my opinion you are a piece of shit racist.
I hope you get banned for posting your bullshit lies.
The only truthful thing in your post are the words "From Khizr Khans own paper". After that you then proceed to show us how you are incapable of reading something and understanding what you are reading. The quote:
are not his words but rather him quoting someone named Al-Shafi'i, you dumb-assed dipstick. I'm not going to waste any more of my time showing that you are a fucking idiot who sees words and freaks because you are too stupid to understand what is being written about.
I hope you wear Depends, you little pantswetter.
Hey way to show that superior liberal intellect.
Its almost like you guys fall back on personal attacks and insults when debating facts doesn't turn out right for you.
Really gets that point across and sells the message, right?
Hey way to show that superior liberal intellect.
Its almost like you guys fall back on personal attacks and insults when debating facts doesn't turn out right for you.
Really gets that point across and sells the message, right?