It was Trump's spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, that said that.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/poli...y-with-khan-comments-and-anti-lgbt-tweets.ece
Wait how did I miss this. Rockford said Khans' Sons death is because Hillary & Obama? He died in 2004, is he talking about the war vote? I just don't get what he's shooting for.
Can't find any info on it, I must have misunderstood the news. I was distracted. Apologies'.
In a CNN interview Tuesday, Pierson adamantly denied that Trump should apologize for his comments about the family of fallen U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan before speculating that Obama's military policies were responsible for Khan's death.
What exactly is Mr. Trump supposed to be apologizing for? Pierson asked. It was under Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton that changed the rules of engagements that probably cost his life.
Let's back up a second. LK completely dodged a question. Even if Kahn was in favor of Sharia Law, how does that excuse Trump's behavior in any way? LK, the Sharia stuff is just to divert the discussion. We can talk about it later, actually, it doesn't matter. Khan isn't running for President. Let's try to focus on the issue, can we? The issue is Trump's response. Certainly, you're not going to say that Trump knew that Khan was pro-Sharia Law (there's no real evidence of that)?
Khan attacked Trump on the basis of religious freedom- isn't that where the whole pocket Constitution came into play?
Sharia Law is completely, in every way at odds with our Constitution and western civilization in general- Free speech, freedom of religion, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights.
If Khan is a believer and supporter of sharia law wouldn't that completely invalidate the argument he made at the DNC?
Isn't trotting out his parents for an emotional appeal during a political event every single bit as or more completely disgusting as the response?
It seems to me this was calculated. The set up and the execution were horrible things to do. But, now you've got the response you want, there can be zero discussion outside the response, correct?
People being tired of this brand of bullshit is the exact same reason Trump won the primaries with record numbers.
Khan attacked Trump on the basis of religious freedom- isn't that where the whole pocket Constitution came into play?
Sharia Law is completely, in every way at odds with our Constitution and western civilization in general- Free speech, freedom of religion, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights.
If Khan is a believer and supporter of sharia law wouldn't that completely invalidate the argument he made at the DNC?
Isn't trotting out his parents for an emotional appeal during a political event every single bit as or more completely disgusting as the response?
It seems to me this was calculated. The set up and the execution were horrible things to do. But, now you've got the response you want, there can be zero discussion outside the response, correct?
People being tired of this brand of bullshit is the exact same reason Trump won the primaries with record numbers.
"You can't go there, Donald! Nobody has ever come out alive!"
"Fuck that! I'm Donald J Trump! I'm going in!"
(Sounds of wild dogs ripping their still living prey to pieces)
Khan attacked Trump on the basis of religious freedom- isn't that where the whole pocket Constitution came into play?
Sharia Law is completely, in every way at odds with our Constitution and western civilization in general- Free speech, freedom of religion, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights.
If Khan is a believer and supporter of sharia law wouldn't that completely invalidate the argument he made at the DNC?
Isn't trotting out his parents for an emotional appeal during a political event every single bit as or more completely disgusting as the response?
It seems to me this was calculated. The set up and the execution were horrible things to do. But, now you've got the response you want, there can be zero discussion outside the response, correct?
People being tired of this brand of bullshit is the exact same reason Trump won the primaries with record numbers.
Khan attacked Trump on the basis of religious freedom- isn't that where the whole pocket Constitution came into play?
Sharia Law is completely, in every way at odds with our Constitution and western civilization in general- Free speech, freedom of religion, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights.
If Khan is a believer and supporter of sharia law wouldn't that completely invalidate the argument he made at the DNC?
Isn't trotting out his parents for an emotional appeal during a political event every single bit as or more completely disgusting as the response?
It seems to me this was calculated. The set up and the execution were horrible things to do. But, now you've got the response you want, there can be zero discussion outside the response, correct?
People being tired of this brand of bullshit is the exact same reason Trump won the primaries with record numbers.
Khan attacked Trump on the basis of religious freedom- isn't that where the whole pocket Constitution came into play?
Sharia Law is completely, in every way at odds with our Constitution and western civilization in general- Free speech, freedom of religion, women's rights, gay rights, minority rights.
If Khan is a believer and supporter of sharia law wouldn't that completely invalidate the argument he made at the DNC?
Isn't trotting out his parents for an emotional appeal during a political event every single bit as or more completely disgusting as the response?
It seems to me this was calculated. The set up and the execution were horrible things to do. But, now you've got the response you want, there can be zero discussion outside the response, correct?
People being tired of this brand of bullshit is the exact same reason Trump won the primaries with record numbers.
A short statement of fact followed by a long tome of innuendo as to the legitimacy of Khan's practice. Nice. Very nice. His inbox was probably so full of hateful shit that he couldn't stand it.
The paywall is convenient, huh? The Daily Squaller probably didn't put any spin on that, did they? I mean, have they ever?
Assange talks conspiracy theory shit, again?
You really should stop with just referencing breitbart non stop and get a clue. You're brainwashed, or appear to be.
Doubling down on ...
Infowars?
There is no indication that Khan's clients have been caught up in the controversies
:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
And your other link:
Do you have the list of clients so we can vet them?
The article merely ties him to a corrupt program and reveals his true motivations for being the shield against corruption exposures Hillary has faced since the wikileaks email dump.
Stop hanging a straw man out there of things I didn't say so you can have an argument.
First, Khan spoke against Sharia law and in preference of the Constitution during his speech at the DNC. Try watching it.
Second, are you also upset by Orthodox Jewish communities, the Amish, and the thousands of Christian communities throughout the US? Do convents and monasteries outrage you, with their nuns and priests sworn to chastity in the name of their faith? Is it against our way of life that you can't go inside a Mormon temple? Do you believe that the Constitution is violated every time the Jehovahs Witnesses knock on your door? Seriously. Because the free exercise of religion guaranteed in the Constitution includes the right for adherents to voluntarily submit themselves to their own religious laws, provided those laws don't violate our secular laws. And yes, even if they're Muslim. Get over it
From Khizr Khans own paper...
The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in the Shariah, Khan writes. All other juridical works must always be subordinated to the Shariah.
For every issue concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.
His own words, except its convenient to change them now. Oh wait, Taqiyya.
...
are not his words but rather him quoting someone named Al-Shafi'i, you dumb-assed dipstick. I'm not going to waste any more of my time showing that you are a fucking idiot who sees words and freaks because you are too stupid to understand what is being written about.For every issue concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.
Another pathetic attempt to derail from Trump's actions DERP
One has to wonder how long Pence will stay on the ticket, given Trump's....."campaign style".
Clearly Pence has ambitions beyond this VP nomination, but how much more exposure to the Trump contagion can he stand before he can't remove the stench?
"You can't go there, Donald! Nobody has ever come out alive!"
"Fuck that! I'm Donald J Trump! I'm going in!"
(Sounds of wild dogs ripping their still living prey to pieces)
Doubling down on a bad hand...we've seen the left do this all week with the dirty tricks and the faux outrage.
EXCLUSIVE: KHIZR KHAN FOUNDED ISLAMIC JOURNAL TO DEFEND SHARIA LAW
Khan defends Sharia law responsible for the executions of gays and women in 11 countries
http://www.infowars.com/what-the-media-isnt-reporting-about-khizr-khan/
and as bluesmax already posted
Khan specializes in visa programs accused of selling U.S. citizenship
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/k...-citizenship/article/2598279?custom_click=rss
Trump says things, the democrats are corruption in action.
People archived his site, I mean, really, what is he hiding that he took it all down. A public figure scurrying away like he was "doxed" ...
You pretending this statement has meaning after wikileaks exposure of left wing media collusion with the DNC... lol
The democrats tried to push a narrative to bury the legitimate news of their corruption. Who are they kidding, the majority of the military does not support Clinton.
Your racist ass may not like it but it's a legitimate government program and he's an immigration attorney. Big fucking deal. That's it, no matter how you try to Trump it up. The Wikileaks bullshit relates to the DNC, not Hillary, and further it shows that Wikileaks is a tool of the Russians and they are using it to try and influence an American election. If you want to embrace foreigners trying to fuck with our system then please proceed, moron. The good thing for everyone who can't stand your bullshit is that you attach yourself to failure movements, at least giving us a blithering idiot to point to and laugh at while your latest love founders and fails.
I'll let you get back to Trump humping, you worthless sack of shit.