Right because corporations are responsible for the responsibility of others. Get a fucking grip.
I guess when I get pulled over for drinking and driving next time I can just tell the cop that it's the liquor corps fault for making it. Oh no wait it's the bartenders fault for serving it. No wait it's the liquor store owners fault for allowing me to buy the bottle.
Or maybe... just maybe.... it's your own fucking fault detective dipshit. Quit always try to pass off responsibility for shit. No corporation is telling people to drink their coke product and then toss the bottle in a river.
strawman. A better example would be ... What if you drove drunk because it was legal and kept killing people. When the country went to make a law about driving drunk the liquor corp lobbied the government to block the law.
thats is 10 lines of absolutly zero information.. I can tell you have training.It's not a strawmen because you have no argument to argue against in the first place.
You just say that corporations are responsible instead of individual people. You never backed up your statement with any real evidence, facts, or even a general argument. You're the typical liberal that loves to blame things indirectly instead of just taking responsibility for individual actions.
Pollution, conservation and recycling should be a non partisan issue world wide. We only have one planet. We should all strive to keep it nice.
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...clean-oceans-trash-floating-foreign-countries
Pollution, conservation and recycling should be a non partisan issue world wide. We only have one planet. We should all strive to keep it nice.
It's not a strawmen because you have no argument to argue against in the first place.
You just say that corporations are responsible instead of individual people. You never backed up your statement with any real evidence, facts, or even a general argument. You're the typical liberal that loves to blame things indirectly instead of just taking responsibility for individual actions.
Did you back that up with anything?It's not a strawmen because you have no argument to argue against in the first place.
You just say that corporations are responsible instead of individual people. You never backed up your statement with any real evidence, facts, or even a general argument. You're the typical liberal that loves to blame things indirectly instead of just taking responsibility for individual actions.
Paris Peace Accords?So, held a gun to his head to make him sign it?
He's pulled out of the Paris Peace Accords, he's rolled back environmental protections for coal miners practically ensuring that we're going to see a spike in black lung disease, the air doesn't matter to him, the water doesn't matter to him, and people don't matter to him.
There's absolutely no way he signed that because he wanted to do "the right thing".
This originated under Bush - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/chapter-33
Obama reauthorized it - https://www.surfrider.org/coastal-b...ne-debris-legislation-signed-by-the-president
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1171rfs/pdf/BILLS-112hr1171rfs.pdf.
Now Trump has it a go at this Bush era law
They just wanted to update it.
Wonder why they updated it?
From reddit
Ammendment
SEC. 210. Major marine casualty property damage threshold.
Section 6101(i)(3) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”.
Original - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/46/6101
Looks like they are capping Federal outlays at 50% of total cost of some
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/756/text
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:33 section:1952 editionrelim)
Meanwhile - Earlier in the year https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...ainability-fisheries-industry-economy-marine/
Losing interest in spending Saturday morning evaluating the updates to the act....
At the very least, this wreaks of normal trump BS
Paris Peace Accords?
Now you're giving President Trump credit for ending the Vietnam war? Wow, win, win double win for the Trump and i'm still not tired of it.
It's not a strawmen because you have no argument to argue against in the first place.
You just say that corporations are responsible instead of individual people. You never backed up your statement with any real evidence, facts, or even a general argument. You're the typical liberal that loves to blame things indirectly instead of just taking responsibility for individual actions.
You screwed up and I got to make fun of you about it. Yet another win.I misspoke. I meant the Paris Climate thing, but in any case, I did say he pulled out.. Something I'm sure Malaria is very familiar with.
Why isn't your "winning" ass down in the mines for a little black lung disease?
Shithole countries? OHH wait ! we can't call them that, somehow it would be wrong! Not politically correct.Shee-it, Sherlock. Over a billion people don't even have toilets, let alone trash removal. It's not an issue of individual responsibility but rather a collective action problem.
Shithole countries? OHH wait ! we can't call them that, somehow it would be wrong! Not politically correct.
No, it's the Democratic reality. Just look at Venezuela.Not really. Their rich are just as pampered as our own but the poor are a lot poorer. It's the Republican ideal.
No, it's the Democratic reality. Just look at Venezuela.
Since you hate freedom so much, get a passport and gtfo. You'll like it more somewhere else.Or western Europe! Commies! I see Commies everywhere!
It's not a strawmen because you have no argument to argue against in the first place.
You just say that corporations are responsible instead of individual people. You never backed up your statement with any real evidence, facts, or even a general argument. You're the typical liberal that loves to blame things indirectly instead of just taking responsibility for individual actions.
You screwed up and I got to make fun of you about it. Yet another win.