So I'm now dishonestly conflating "PR stunts"? Wow...this is rich. Dude, you're a complete moron if you can't understand the context of my comments. Just saying.
Last edited:
So I'm now dishonestly conflating "PR stunts"? Wow...this is rich. Dude, you're a complete moron if you can't understand the context of my comments. Just saying.Everyone can see your dishonest rhetorical attempt at conflating dissimilar things. For your sake you don't want to follow buckshot's lead.
And saving 1000 jobs is just a "PR stunt" as well. There's a reason I used quotes.
So I'm now dishonestly conflating "PR stunts"? Wow...this is rich. Dude, you're a complete moron if you can't understand the context on my comments. Just saying.
Tell us exactly what was offered to have this company stay or shut your hole.Because it's for select companies and not all companies. Not really a complicated thing.
He's just dishonest.So I'm now dishonestly conflating "PR stunts"? Wow...this is rich. Dude, you're a complete moron if you can't understand the context on my comments. Just saying.
Tell us exactly what was offered to have this company stay or shut your hole.
You must have as nonstandard definition of "constantly" as you do with"explicitly". You still don't know what happened here, saying if I don't agree with you then I'm a moron is pretty pathetic.If you think this company was not offered anything in addition to what is generally available you're a moron.
By the way, nice job being a hypocrite again. You constantly whine about how other people can't tell you what to do or how their opinions aren't binding on you and then you come out and tell someone else to 'shut their hole'. I find your constant hypocrisy hilarious.
Perhaps blue states could lead by example. The LA Times has recently been featuring stories on how 20% of city tax revenues are going towards pension obligations for public employees. 20%!!! The product of decades of collusion between Democrats and unions. We are talking about people retiring in their 50s with 6-figure near full salary entitlement benefits.
We've become a welfare society.
You must have as nonstandard definition of "constantly" as you do with"explicitly". You still don't know what happened here, saying if I don't agree with you then I'm a moron is pretty pathetic.
And you've misunderstood, either on purpose or by accident, what I was complaining about, but you don't care about truth or representing your opponents fairly, you're a complete hack.
If you think this company was not offered anything
Democrats have exclusively managed those negotiations in Los Angeles and other blue states since the 70s.The bulk of those pension payouts go to the Republican-controlled police and fire unions, but why let facts get in your way?
Give me an example of government investment that was not selectiveIt's a violation when done selectively.
The best part is watching all the Repub politicians who raved against the bailouts (You know, the ones that staved off economic collapse) all whooping & hollering about 1000 jobs.
It's also great to see them moving back towards Wild West levels of financial regulation that led to the need for the bailouts in the first place.
What could go wrong?
so in other words, you find it so distasteful that Trump is keeping American jobs and instead of saying "That's Great!" you want to spin it as a negative of secret back room deals.
christ that's pathetic.
I'm not denying anything, genius. You still don't know what happened here, what you think happened could be completely wrong.No, I think you're a moron because you're denying the plainly obvious.
You do it a lot to your "opponents". You take things in the worse possible way to ridicule them. I did tell you by the way.Oh good, another case where you've been unfairly represented. This seems to happen to you a lot, poor guy! I would love to help you with this problem but mysteriously most of the time you complain about being misrepresented you then refuse to say how.
Right after you explain how somebody can "explicitly" state something without saying it at all.Speaking of definitions were you able to come up with one for 'throwaway tweet' yet? Still trying to get to the bottom of that one. Maybe we can solve the mystery together.
The meltdown continues. haha
careful, you may get sentNo, I think you're a moron because you're denying the plainly obvious.
Oh good, another case where you've been unfairly represented. This seems to happen to you a lot, poor guy! I would love to help you with this problem but mysteriously most of the time you complain about being misrepresented you then refuse to say how.
Speaking of definitions were you able to come up with one for 'throwaway tweet' yet? Still trying to get to the bottom of that one. Maybe we can solve the mystery together.
I'm not denying anything, genius. You still don't know what happened here, what you think happened could be completely wrong.
You do it a lot to your "opponents". You take things in the worse possible way to ridicule them. I did tell you by the way.
Right after you explain how somebody can "explicitly" state something without saying it at all.
But really, we don't know what happened here and you making a huge deal out of it as if you did just shows how much you're melting down. Trying to help you.
No, they have not. But you keep on believing whatever you want to believe.Democrats have exclusively managed those negotiations in Los Angeles and other blue states since the 70s.
careful, you may get sent
TO THE LIST™!!!!
Agree. In my opinion, these guys are fucking insane to twist this into a negative without knowing any details. Facts be damned...boogiemen are everywhere! It would be comical if it wasn't so fucking pathetic.so in other words, you find it so distasteful that Trump is keeping American jobs and instead of saying "That's Great!" you want to spin it as a negative of secret back room deals.
christ that's pathetic.
I eagerly await your enlightenment, O Master of Bullshit.I don't think you really understand what happened with Trump.
Agree. In my opinion, these guys are fucking insane to twist this into a negative without knowing any details. Facts be damned...boogiemen are everywhere! It would be comical if it wasn't so fucking pathetic.
You know nothing except for your fabricated assumptions and then proceed to wildly extrapolate from there. Wake the fuck up, you're embarrassing yourself.Unless the details are 'gave the company nothing' this is a dumb idea and that much should be obvious to anyone. Any CEO with a brain should be cooking up a Mexico outsourcing plan right now to see what sort of goodies they can get from the government.
I agree it's pathetic to see those avowed free marketeers jump ship on that conviction within a month of the right sports team getting elected though. Guess picking winners and losers is okay so long as it's a Republican doing it. I'm sure he'll only pick the BEST winners.
The meltdown continues. I don't believe anything about this deal, I don't know what happened.Yes, I'm sure all it took was them to say pretty please. You might be stupid enough to believe that but that doesn't mean the rest of us are.
Ok, but can you explain to me exactly what this deal entails? You seem to be holding back on some very important information.Bucky, you need help FROM me, not to be trying to give help TO me. Before you're ready to help anyone else you've got to get past your juvenile refusal to admit error and your constant dishonesty. You're just not there yet.