Perhaps, perhaps not.They have been a passive enemy. Telling them 'do what we want, to our standards, and give us unfettered access to your facilities or we will bomb you' is going to make an active enemy of them. It is nothing short of a declaration of war. They will go from covertly financially supporting anti-America groups to actively forming, training, and getting them access to the US.
Who said Syria was going to attack Israel? It certainly wasn't me...and anyone with half a brain can see that.Spreading the fear, obviously. Syria is in no kind of shape to attack Israel & anybody with half a brain knows it.
Bibi would love it.
Who said Syria was going to attack Israel? It certainly wasn't me. Certainly anyone with half a brain can see that.
You were saying??? I would ingest small portion of that crow.
Wall St. rallies on higher oil after U.S. quits Iran deal
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...r-oil-after-u-s-quits-iran-deal-idUSKBN1IA1QJ
There's no justification for those airstrikes if you don't want to believe there's justification for those airstrikes....obviously. Willy nilly random attacks certainly makes sense to me! /sSo there is no justification for the airstrikes against Syria, obviously. Or maybe Bibi is planning on chewing off more territory in the Golan to... create a "buffer zone" & protect Israel, obviously. That was the original rationale for keeping the Golan but they moved in the settlers as fast as they said it...
There is building conversation that the EU might use blocking regulations to protect their companies from US sanctions so they can continue trade with Iran if they want to maintain the deal. The US would then be faced with the choice of sanctioning euro companies which would 100% start a barn burner of a trade war. This has come up before and the US backed down.
Yeah, emptying the US arsenal of missiles against a fully formed opponent that is not in the midst of civil war. Where Russia and China would want to punish us for it. Weapons hot in the Middle East is a fool's errand.Agree. The "new deal" will likely involve tactical strikes if Iran chooses to continue their nuclear program...I think he's grown a special fondness for this approach.
There's no justification for those airstrikes if you don't want to believe there's justification for those airstrikes....obviously. Willy nilly random attacks certainly makes sense to me! /s
Just read that article. His excuse was 'well that's what they (Trump club) told me to say. Clueless is as clueless does. So now we are going to have an economic war with Europe? What could possibly go wrong. I guess it was a good idea for me to move most of my retirement out of equities.Richard Grenell, Trump's new ambassador in Germany sent this tweet on his first day on the job: "As @realDonaldTrump said, US sanctions will target critical sectors of Iran’s economy. German companies doing business in Iran should wind down operations immediately."
This was not well received.... Obviously diplomacy is hard.
The rest of the world has no reason to trust America anymore, and as a result they know that it is in their best interest to do everything possible to ensure they no longer need America politically, economically or culturally. Strangely a lot of Trump supporters seem to consider this a win, as if taking your ball and going home is a "win" when the result is you sitting alone in your basement with a ball that is of no use to you anymore while all your former friends go play a different game without you. Looks like it's possible Europe and Asia will move on without the USA.
Edit: It's all good cause he's gay.Just read that article. His excuse was 'well that's what they (Trump club) told me to say. Clueless is as clueless does. So now we are going to have an economic war with Europe? What could possibly go wrong. I guess it was a good idea for me to move most of my retirement out of equities.
There's no justification for those airstrikes if you don't want to believe there's justification for those airstrikes....obviously. Willy nilly random attacks certainly makes sense to me! /s
And what could they possibly accomplish, besides risking retaliation?What would the justification be?
Nope. and even if we did, it's not like the worlds largest manufacturer (and user) of, any kind of, weapons has any say in it. Grow up.Iran will probably have nukes in a few years.
And it's not like the US establishes military bases anytime, anywhere possible by the dozen; it's only a threat when Iran does it.Apparently Israel feels threatened by Iranian drones in their airspace, two Iranian military bases in Syria right on their border, and Iranian missiles located in Syria pointing at them.
And what could they possibly accomplish, besides risking retaliation?
Iran is already attacking Israel and has for decades, they're just using proxies to do it.
Apparently Israel feels threatened by Iranian drones in their airspace, two Iranian military bases in Syria right on their border, and Iranian missiles located in Syria pointing at them.
I have yet to find ANYONE to show how cancelling the JCPOA makes us safer...
still waiting
As is the JCPOA doesn't prevent Iran from ordering Hwasong charges for Shahab rebrands.I have yet to find ANYONE to show how cancelling the JCPOA makes us safer...
As is the JCPOA doesn't prevent Iran from ordering Hwasong charges for Shahab rebrands.
North Korea -> Primorsky Krai -> North Caucasian Federal District -> Caspian Sea -> Iran // etc
Prevent NK/IRAN trade and in turn safe America.
no u.I'm guessing you were dropped on your head as an infant.
I'm liking Shepard Smith more and more lately. Apparently, he cut off some author on his show that was saying Trump pulled out of the agreement and Shep says there is no provision to withdraw from the treaty, he just violated it. Good on you Shep.