Believe this: it wont matter to Trump voters
My oh my, I goofed!!
Thank God I screwed that up! Imagine the consequences if the question hadn't been invalidated by a typo!
That was a close one boy's, keep up the good work.
Interesting how these rape and scandal accusations seem to surface when the campaign cycle starts to heat up.
That was a little hurtful."Boys" not boy's, you illiterate putz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think the Republican party in California got enough votes in the primary to even have a Senatorial candidate on the general election ballot.Since you're from California, that means you voted for a republican for the Senate. Meaning you voted for the Senate refusing to hold the president accountable. So you are part of the problem, even if your attempts were unsuccessful.
That was a little hurtful.
I find that people who assume that is her motive as vile as I do all the absurd and hateful charges people here level at you. I see people who have faith in their stupid opinions to have weak character, so much so they will never consider the fact they have no real data to support what they are talking about.Are you suggesting that this poor victimized woman that has lead a life of mistreatment at the hands of men might be in some way disingenuous? That she might be embellishing a story for greater notoriety and increased sales of her product?
Shame on you sir! Shame, shame, shame.
Plonk
I find that people who assume that is her motive as vile as I do all the absurd and hateful charges people here level at you. I see people who have faith in their stupid opinions to have weak character, so much so they will never consider the fact they have no real data to support what they are talking about.
I have no problem with opinion stated as such. What I see is that most opinion is expressed as if it were certainty. My opinion, of which I am quite convinced is certainly true, is that people who are certain about their opinions are assholes.To be fair, no one here has any real data. It is all opinion until he is actually charged. We only know what we are told and most of our opinions on it are based on his character that we see. I read a bunch more regarding the lawsuits against him currently as well as this one and I still don't understand why she waited until now to come forward. She claims she was worried about Trump's lawyers, and that is a very good reason, but that reason is no better now than it was when the other women were all coming forward, in fact it is worse since he is president.
You're right. We have four data points.I find that people who assume that is her motive as vile as I do all the absurd and hateful charges people here level at you. I see people who have faith in their stupid opinions to have weak character, so much so they will never consider the fact they have no real data to support what they are talking about.
You left out a data point. If it quacks like a Donald...You're right. We have four data points.
1. A claim many many years later the the event occurred.
2. An opportunity to present the claim before Trump was elected, and wasn't done.
3. A new book that needs to be marketed.
Two of those things are accusations that can't be substantiated, and one has to question, why now? One of them has an immediate and large impact on the woman's income, and neatly answers the "why now" question. That single accusation is worth a lot of money to the person making it.
Doesn't mean you're right.
Jean Carroll
Jill Harth
Ivana Trump
Kristen Anderson
Lisa Boyne
Temple Taggart
Mariah Billado
Cathy Heller
Karena Virginia
Brigit Sullivan
Tasha Dixon
Natasha Stoynoff
Rachel Crooks
Mindy McGillivray
Jennifer Murphy
Jessica Drake
Ninni Laaksonen
Summer Zervos
Cassandra Searles
Alva Johnson
Juliet Huddy
Jessica Leeds
There's nothing to see here folks, move along now. C'mon, move along.
This is true. It also doesn't mean you're right.
Aside from the fact we are talking about Donald Trump as was already mentioned, there is the matter that if she had actually been raped she deserves to make some money off of that fact, wouldn’t you say. The possibility of that justification alone, seems to me, to cancel your objection. Why assume greed when it is just as easily payback.......You're right. We have four data points.
1. A claim many many years later the the event occurred.
2. An opportunity to present the claim before Trump was elected, and wasn't done.
3. A new book that needs to be marketed.
Two of those things are accusations that can't be substantiated, and one has to question, why now? One of them has an immediate and large impact on the woman's income, and neatly answers the "why now" question. That single accusation is worth a lot of money to the person making it.
PlonkShhh, StarTard1975 is on a concern mission thumbing concern to many posts including ones like this... Such a fall from grace. Relegated right into the shit pond with the rest of the America hating shitstains.
If she was raped by Trump, I'd like to see him spend the rest of his days in prison. But there is one item missing from that equation.Aside from the fact we are talking about Donald Trump as was already mentioned, there is the matter that if she had actually been raped she deserves to make some money off of that fact, wouldn’t you say. The possibility of that justification alone, seems to me, to cancel your objection. Why assume greed when it is just as easily payback.......
If she was raped by Trump, I'd like to see him spend the rest of his days in prison. But there is one item missing from that equation.
There is motivation for her to be less than honest about the story, so we end up right back where it always ends up, our decision is based on how much we hate Trump.