Yeah OP, you're forgetting that he's trying to dismantle NATO, that even with his cowtowing he still almost triggered a serious confrontation between us and Russia due to Syria. He seems to be working to enable Israel and Saudi Arabia working to seed chaos in the Middle East (they're every bit the instigators that Iran is, and that includes their attempts at espionage in the US and attempts to manipulate our government).
Isn't Russia fucking around in Ukraine again too? If Turmp stands down and lets Russia fuck Ukraine, that is going to tell Europe that we're compromised and can't be relied on (which will have ramifications for probably the next century...), and Russia is gonna see blood in the water and they're gonna up their aggression even more.
I don't know, Turmp probably did make an inquiry into setting up a resort there or something. Hell, maybe NK even offered it. They have that giant empty pyramid hotel building...
I think the NK stuff though was mostly that people told him "no US President has ever been able to make meaningful progress with them" and Turmp, believing he really is this master deal maker, thought he'd be able to get a deal done in a weekend. And then he met his match in basically a younger North Korean version of himself (Turmp and Jong Un are more alike than they're different).
Though he _hasn't_ dismantled NATO. And, while Dubya may not have been the smartest President ever, when it came to foreign policy he did have very focused and ideologically-driven advisors and was capable of listening to them and getting on board with them. Not sure whether Trump has a Rumsfeld or a Wolfowitz (probably not) but even if he does he certainly isn't capable of listening to them or even understanding what they are saying.
If Trump had a focus and ideological certainty about foreign policy to match that of the neo-cons, he'd probably have seen that (antipathy to NATO) through to it's logical conclusion. Instead he simply doesn't seem that interested in the world outside his domestic prejudices, and gets pulled this-way-and-that depending on which insiders he comes under the influence of at any given moment (which seems to me to explain that oddly ritualistic cruise-missile assualt on Syria, which as far as I can make out cost more in US ordnance than it did in damage to Assad's forces)
You can accuse him of not standing up to US enemies, but then the manner of such 'standing up' has not, with past, smarter, Presidents, necessarily been a good thing anyway.
I still think that in foreign-policy (and that alone) he hasn't (yet) plumbed the depths that some of his predecessors did. And it's largely because he's just not that interested in it.
What he _has_ done, certainly, is undermine the image of the US globally. I believe the surveys show every country that isn't Israel now has a more negative view of the US. He makes the US look unreliable and a bit ridiculous (mind you, I'm just waiting till Boris Johnson becomes PM...sigh).