Next we ban 'christian' poseurs like you.
Provide quotes and make your case.
More Fake News and lies from the MSM...this is getting fn crazy.false title Bullshit. There is no muslim ban.
Snarky and condescending...oh noes! lolI would have to quote the entire interview. He was all over the place with whether it applied to green card holders or not. Then when the host asked for clarification a couple times, he got snarky and condescending.
Snarky and condescending...oh noes! lol
More Fake News and lies from the MSM...this is getting fn crazy.
Agree...thread title is a lie. I'll ask mods to correct.
Read the following.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...uspension-entry-aliens-subject-united-nations
For some more background, read the following.
http://www.americanthinker.com/arti...rings_hypocritical_and_hysterical_uproar.html
It's becoming pretty clear that casket makers and funeral homes are going to thrive under a Trump presidency because the left and especially the progressive left is going to put themselves into early graves. This type of hysteria based on fake news and "feelings" isn't good for you. You're going to drive up the cost of health care for everyone before you get interred too and we can't have that.
It's scary how often this needs to be repeated and repeated and repeated.Here's Giuliani talking about the muslim ban that Trump ordered him to figure out in a legal way.
On Fox news. Is Fox real enough for you?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...sion-to-do-it-legally/?utm_term=.6f838561babb
Dude and this lady seem pretty happy about it working out, too.
This is merely a 3 month moratorium to review our vetting process for the exact same "Muslim-majority" countries that Obama's administration identified as "countries of concern" and restricted their access to the Visa Waiver Program a year ago....oh noes!
The Left has gone insane.
Muslim ban? Then it looks like he forgot to add about 48 other Muslim-majority countries. The reality here is that this isn't a Muslim ban and that the clear intent was and always has been to get better control of the process in order to prevent the possible entry of radical Islamic terrorists into this country. The Executive Order targets "countries of concern" (as previously identified by the Obama administration) which have a significant population of Muslim extremists...and these are the exact countries which the Obama administration also placed travel restrictions on a year ago. You guys are either as obtuse as hell or being intentionally dishonest. There is no Muslim ban....that's all you and your unhinged, butthurt, and highly dishonest false narrative. God forbid we reexamine the vetting process for these people! Oh noes!Here's Giuliani talking about the muslim ban that Trump ordered him to figure out in a legal way.
On Fox news. Is Fox real enough for you?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...sion-to-do-it-legally/?utm_term=.6f838561babb
Dude and this lady seem pretty happy about it working out, too.
Muslim ban? Then it looks like he forgot to add about 48 other Muslim-majority countries. The reality here is that this isn't a Muslim ban and that the clear intent was and always has been to control the possible entry of radical Islamic terrorists into this country. The Executive Order targets "countries of concern" (as previously identified by the Obama's administration) which have a significant population of Muslim extremists...and these are the exact countries which the Obama's administration also placed travel restrictions on a year ago. You guys are either as obtuse as hell or being intentionally dishonest. There is no Muslim ban....that's all you and your unhinged, butthurt, and highly dishonest false narrative. God forbid we reexamine the vetting process for these people! Oh noes!
It's possible that like me, he is ignoring you.You are wrong and I already pointed out the specific language in the EO with which it makes you wrong.
nope, just pointing out potential trouble where I see it, this one proclaims to be religious, and christian, so......TROLL Alert!!!
Let me help you out.
The part that has the potential to make this EO unconstitutional is the paragraph below, specifically the bolded.
What that paragraph says is that exceptions will be made for religious persecutions, nothing wrong with that, except, it goes one step further and specifies that the persecuted religions must be a minority religion of that country. Since the countries listed are predominantly Muslim, the EO does in fact ban Muslims since their religious persecution won't be an exception like other religions would be.
That is a clear violation of the constitution and existing immigration laws.
Name me a country other than the united states where the majority religion is being persecuted.
They're not allowed to burn witches anymore.Christians are being persecuted?
Fucking what?
It's OK If A Republican Violates The Constitution.
(The 2nd amendment is the only one the really counts anyway)
Soon to come:
It's OK If A Republican Uses Lots of Executive Orders
It's OK If A Republican Massively Increases The Debt
They're not allowed to burn witches anymore.
It's OK If A Democrat Violates The Constitution.
(The 2nd amendment doesn't really count anyway)
Soon to come:
It's OK If A Democrat Uses Lots of Executive Orders
It's OK If A Democrat Massively Increases The Debt
Any one recognize this? Cmon think back over the past 8 years you'll get it.
You are wrong and I already pointed out the specific language in the EO with which it makes you wrong.
Stop fucking lying! This bullshit has been debunked!
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/iraqi-refugee-us-refugee-program-restarts-117318
A special U.S. refugee program for Iraqis is back up and running this month after being largely suspended almost a year ago due to growing insecurity in the Arab country, POLITICO has learned.