Go cry a river somewhere. Milo got standard that he applied to others applied to himself.
Oh, you mean like advocating for the gang rape of celebrity like Palin? Oh wait, that was not grounds enough for any action.
Does the term "double standard" mean anything to you?
It fits my world view of requiring real evidence before making statements of bias. Anecdotal evidence is by definition one person's story.
Paranoia will destroy ya.Only if by "disruptive" you mean "holds a different political belief than we do". Again, it's been shown umpteen times that others don't get banned when doing far worse things than him, so the "disruptive" argument doesn't hold water. The difference is that the other "disruptive" trolls are lefties so they are tolerated. He's a righty, so they booted him.
Go cry a river somewhere.
lol, when you have no logical answer :biggrin::biggrin: Do you need some time to check with dailykos or huffpo or some other crap site to get new talking points??
Paranoia will destroy ya.
Why do you hate free enterprise?
This is not "one person's story". There are many specific examples of behavior that is tolerated vs tweets that are not tolerated that cannot logically be explained in any other way. There is a double standard.
What makes you think I don't want free enterprise? Unlike the regressive left, I'm not looking for the force of government to force everyone to agree with my view. Twitter can be as biased and hypocritical as they want.
What is your objective basis for determining that there's a double standard? Saying 'I have five stories' instead of saying 'I have one story' is no more objective or empirical a basis for forming this opinion.
By "actual research" you mean "lefty groups trying to confirm their beliefs with "studies", then sure. Otherwise, no.Remember all the times when conservatives claimed the media was biased against them? Endless anecdotes of media bias. Then actual research was done and it has generally found little to no bias.
Uh, anecdotes can very easily be facts. I think what you're trying to say is that drawing conclusion from anecdotes might be a bad idea.......That should be a warning to people that taking anecdotes as facts is a bad idea.
You want enterprise, just not free enterprise. In Milo's logic: Calling Twitter biased or hypocritical has a chilling effect on free enterprise.
Huh? No, only lefty idiots would adhere to that kind of logic.
If someone presents case after case that can't be logically explained in any other way, then that's sufficient to conclude that there is a double standard. Is it conclusive? No, because only twitter has all the info for a systemic review, and they aren't about to expose their own bias and hypocrisy. Duh.
By "actual research" you mean "lefty groups trying to confirm their beliefs with "studies", then sure. Otherwise, no.
Uh, anecdotes can very easily be facts. I think what you're trying to say is that drawing conclusion from anecdotes might be a bad idea.......
It's simple, Twitter has a right to ban this loser. If Republicans don't like it, you can get off Twitter too. Something is telling me Trump is not about to stop his verbal diarrhea there.
Hellllooooooo..... don't you get tired of battling that same strawman? Nobody has said they don't have a right to ban that loser. Can we put that one to rest already?
So we don't know if it can be logically explained in any other way because we don't have sufficient information.
No, I mean actual empirical research. If you think all academic research is inherently biased then you're basically in a neverending positive feedback loop where no contrary information can ever be admitted. I mean if you think the media is biased and then researchers show you it isn't to which your response is they must then be biased too you've made yourself immune to facts.
Hellllooooooo..... don't you get tired of battling that same strawman? Nobody has said they don't have a right to ban that loser. Can we put that one to rest already?
Are Republicans going to get off Twitter too? I mean they have to stand up for "free speech."
I dunno, I'm not a republican. As a conservative I know I'm not welcome on twitter though, so I'll stay away. To each his own.
Bottom line, they booted him for being conservative and gay. This is a combination that dismantles most SJWs' arguments in a heartbeat and therefore he was a threat to their political agenda. Telling someone to suck it up =! "harrassment", not even here at AT. Twitter embarrassed itself and made Milo the martyr which is exactly what he wanted.
Oh, you mean like advocating for the gang rape of celebrity like Palin? Oh wait, that was not grounds enough for any action.
Does the term "double standard" mean anything to you?
Bottom line, they booted him for being conservative and gay.
Actually, the tens of articles written about twitter arbitrarily banning someone has had an effect. You must be living in a cave, you can come out anytime now.Great! He got what he wanted, and what he wanted for others. Nobody cares if he is a "martyr" to some idiots.
Bottom line, they booted him for being a troll and inimical to their business.