- Jan 15, 2006
- 7
- 0
- 0
I was wondering is someone could help me with these 2 questions.
1.) If there was 2 ways to reach the same exact speed using the mult and FSB is one preferred over the other.
Example: I can OC my E6400 to 2.4 Ghz two ways -
(8X mult and 300 FSB) or (6X mult and 400 FSB)
Is one way better than the other or it doesn't matter as long as they are stable.
2.) I am using PC 6400 (800) RAM. If I OC with a combination of Mult and FSB that causes the RAM to operate at a speed that is lower than the rated speed (because of the mathematical relationship of the 3) am I wasting the capabilty of the RAM given that I paid more for the higher speed RAM.
Example: With a Mult of 8X, a FSB or 333 and a mem mult of 2(1 to 1 Ratio), I think my memory will run at 667 instead of 800. (Sorry if math is wrong). Should I avoid OC settings that don't make full use of my memory's capability. I have a GA-965P-S3 and it seems like it doesn't like any other mem mult except 2.0
Thanks
1.) If there was 2 ways to reach the same exact speed using the mult and FSB is one preferred over the other.
Example: I can OC my E6400 to 2.4 Ghz two ways -
(8X mult and 300 FSB) or (6X mult and 400 FSB)
Is one way better than the other or it doesn't matter as long as they are stable.
2.) I am using PC 6400 (800) RAM. If I OC with a combination of Mult and FSB that causes the RAM to operate at a speed that is lower than the rated speed (because of the mathematical relationship of the 3) am I wasting the capabilty of the RAM given that I paid more for the higher speed RAM.
Example: With a Mult of 8X, a FSB or 333 and a mem mult of 2(1 to 1 Ratio), I think my memory will run at 667 instead of 800. (Sorry if math is wrong). Should I avoid OC settings that don't make full use of my memory's capability. I have a GA-965P-S3 and it seems like it doesn't like any other mem mult except 2.0
Thanks