- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,425
- 8,388
- 126
i just read an airplane novel where US powerbrokers arranged for a yemeni terrorist to acquire russian bioweapons for use against the US while framing iran, so, this seems a bit surreal
I won't lie, as I was reading about this, my brain instantly created a thread from today, through the next two weeks of saber rattling, to an announcement next month of 'wartime operatoins' in Iran, to five years of war, to a memo 25 years from now noting that it was either US-backed mercs or a US unit specifically that instigated this event.i just read an airplane novel where US powerbrokers arranged for a yemeni terrorist to acquire russian bioweapons for use against the US while framing iran, so, this seems a bit surreal
I'll also venture a guess right now that the Russians are somehow responsible for this, whether directly or indirectly.
Im predicting with 100% certainty that we’ll see more recessions in the future as well.
I'll also venture a guess right now that the Russians are somehow responsible for this, whether directly or indirectly.
Yes. This is one of the reasons...I'll also venture a guess right now that the Russians are somehow responsible for this, whether directly or indirectly.
Yeah, and it's only because I don't want to think about the distinct possibility that the incompetent Trump admin is behind it, or both of them coordinating (NO COLLUSION!).That's not really a bad guess at all.
Mines that breach the hull above the water line? Impressive.They're saying it was mines, not a torpedo.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/oil-tankers-attack-mike-pompeo-133122546.html
Because why would they need to provide evidence? His statement alone has convinced 33% of the population that Iran has done this thing and their minds will never be able to be changed.Oil tankers attack: Mike Pompeo blames Iran for 'blatant assault' in Gulf of Oman without providing evidence
Mines that breach the hull above the water line? Impressive.
I'll also venture a guess right now that the Russians are somehow responsible for this, whether directly or indirectly.
Ironic since it's suspected that first one was also a false flag op.not really considering a mine can be attached to a ship above the water line...
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-finds-mine-possibly-pointing-to-iran-tanker-attack-2019-6
https://news.yahoo.com/crew-one-oil-tankers-abandoned-175052514.html
i can't find a more respected source, but the point stands.
Ironic since it's suspected that first one was also a false flag op.
As a note, I don't personally consider an attachable limpet explosive to be a 'mine', but I may just be using older terminology. My notion of a mine is $thing that floats in the water and waits for something to touch it, at which point it explodes. That necessitates it being at, or under, the water line.
If it's $thing ('mine' or otherwise) attached to side of ship above water line, that's a planted explosive, which is what I referenced in my post above.
Okay, so yeah that's just a terminology difference on my part. I'll make note of that if I hear a republican official talking about Iran 'mining' the gulf/strait, since given the information on Limpet mines, they're delivered directly to the target.I hear you but it is what it is - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limpet_mine
Now we're gonna be asked to trust the intelligence agencies that Trump has derided for 2 years. This is one of the biggest reasons that public undermining our institutions is a serious problem even though "he doesn't mean it" or "he's hyperbolic" etc etc.
No predicate for the US going to war. Whoever is responsible for the attack Japan was hit.
We do not have an agreement ala NATO with Japan. Makes no sense since Iran was currently in talks with Japan.
I've been saying this for months we are being setup!!!!
The conspiracy is taking this administration at its word on anything.Sounds like a conspiracy theory. You've been all about those lately..
The economy?
One serious consequence that comes from lying about everything is that while it's entirely possible that Iran was behind this attack (I mean, who knows at this point) there's absolutely no way I would trust a single word the Trump administration has to say about it.
Like, if they showed up with a tape of the Supreme Leader personally attaching an explosive to a ship I would want a second source to verify.