And where are you getting that information? I don't see any Chinese F-22s, cruise missiles or stuxnet variations.
as far as carriers go, yes. they are more advanced in other areas though. aircraft, missiles, and cyberwarfare come to mind.
It would just make them spend a butt ton more on their military.
I'd rather everyone stopped waving their dicks at each other and tried to sort the problem out like adults.
It's the Chinese that are not acting like adults. Full of histrionics and arrogance, they are trying to bully everyone in that region. They need a good beating.
Don't you know that there is a huge double standard with what all other countries do and what we do? It's all about "American Exceptionalism". We hold ourselves as superior, well except for our kids' test scores, or our healthcare costs, or our CO2 emissions, or our surveillance morality, etc., etc., etc.
How about some evidence. I'm tired of people bad mouthing the USA, back it up.
Bollocks! There's full on dick waving on all sides there.
And yet China seems to be the only one playing chicken with other peoples' navies. If anyone's going to cause an international incident that ends in bloodshed, I can all but guarantee it'll be China.
You can only play chicken with two participants.
Because the Royal Navy would stop and allow their mission in international waters to be dictated to them by any Chinese scow that happens upon them right?
You can only play chicken with two participants.
Perhaps "playing chicken" isn't entirely accurate. According to the article in the OP, they intentionally moved one of their transport ships to block the Cowpens's path, intentionally risking a collision.
If we were talking cars and a collision happened like that, the Chinese would be at fault in any court in any nation.
Bollocks! There's full on dick waving on all sides there.
And where are you getting that information? I don't see any Chinese F-22s, cruise missiles or stuxnet variations.
How about some evidence. I'm tired of people bad mouthing the USA, back it up.
We should have sunk it.
as far as carriers go, yes. they are more advanced in other areas though. aircraft, missiles, and cyberwarfare come to mind.
More advanced in aircraft? That one is totally laughable. They can barely make a functioning turbofan engine for their fighters. Their avionics are a decade behind at least. They may have the shape of stealth pretty figured out but learning to actually manufacture coatings, materials, etc at a competitive level simply takes time and money. Even if you steal the formula you can't steal generational knowledge.
Same with carriers... even if they do manage to design a good operational carrier who are they going to staff it with? Guys that have umm, never worked on a carrier.
Missiles... well yes they have a lot of missiles. Most are short range. They have the ASBM's and such but most likely they would never work without nuclear warheads.
Cyberwarfare, who really knows? Hard to assess.
More advanced in aircraft? That one is totally laughable. They can barely make a functioning turbofan engine for their fighters. Their avionics are a decade behind at least. They may have the shape of stealth pretty figured out but learning to actually manufacture coatings, materials, etc at a competitive level simply takes time and money. Even if you steal the formula you can't steal generational knowledge.
Same with carriers... even if they do manage to design a good operational carrier who are they going to staff it with? Guys that have umm, never worked on a carrier.
Missiles... well yes they have a lot of missiles. Most are short range. They have the ASBM's and such but most likely they would never work without nuclear warheads.
Cyberwarfare, who really knows? Hard to assess.
your killing me with your asinine uneducated diatribe.........also go read any other book on the subject.
At the time, the Air Quality Index had climbed to 487 in Beijing and 404 in Shanghai. The scale goes up to 500, but levels above 300 are considered dangerous.
Chinese aviation is still reliant in many ways on Russia. Media attention has focused on China’s domestic development programs, including stealth fighter-bombers and helicopters. The advance of Chinese aviation capabilities is by now a common theme, with every month seeming to bring new revelations about its programs. While the ability to manufacture and perform design work on these projects represents significant progress, “under the hood” these aircraft often feature Russian engines. China continues to try to copy or steal Russian engine technology because of a strong preference for building systems itself.
China insists that — at this point in its development — stricter standards are impossible and that emphasis must be placed on China becoming a superpower. However, now that China is speaking about pollution so candidly, fixing it is another matter, as is dealing with its effects.
This guy is nothing but a cheerleader for China. He buys everything they sell and then tries to peddle the shit on here.
I doubt he is "scandanavian".