U.S. vs. Canada

[SilentZero]

Conditions:

-No WMD's allowed
-U.S. could only use the National Guard
-Canada could not get "outside" help


Yes I know this is a stupid question, but im sick and drunk so I am allowed a few.

 

[amol]

U.S.A.

 

[jds2006]

US?

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: Amol
U.S.A.

Fvck Yeah!

 

[suicidalpigeon]

as jeremy hotz would say: "canada should just attack sombody. noone would see that coming."

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: SilentZero

Originally posted by: Amol
U.S.A.

Fvck Yeah!

Oh that note...time for more beer!

 

[klah]

Does Canada get to use their Navy?

 

[maddogchen]

Mexico!

Eventually.

 

[SilentZero]

Canada Invades!!!

 

[QuitBanningMe]

I'll say US. This plan looks solid.
http://invadecanada.us/

 

[imported_Mike]

Originally posted by: klah
Does Canada get to use their Navy?

lol, would be more funny if the U.S. Coast Guard wasn't spackled along the side.

 

[suicidalpigeon]

whats canada's military strength anyways? i keep viewing an army of hockey players.

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
whats canada's military strength anyways? i keep viewing an army of hockey players.

Canada's Military Strength *GlobalSecurity.org*

Oh and to save you the trouble of reading all of that...their military is pretty much non-existant.

 

[Mo0o]

USA. better technology

 

[SilentZero]

Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: SilentZero
Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

no

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: SilentZero
Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

no

Well what if everyone left the U.S. and the only people left behind were blind midgets....how about then?

 

[nsafreak]

Originally posted by: SilentZero
Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

Nope they'd still lose. The U.S has people with friggin' howitzers in their backyards.

 

[bradruth]

Originally posted by: maddogchen
Mexico!

Eventually.

It's not a corruption contest we're talking about.

Originally posted by: SilentZero

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: SilentZero
Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

no

Well what if everyone left the U.S. and the only people left behind were blind midgets....how about then?

Then Viva la Canada.

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: SilentZero

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: SilentZero
Ok...well what if the U.S. Military wasn't allowed to respond and the nations defense rested soley on the populace...would Canada have a better shot at victory?

no

Well what if everyone left the U.S. and the only people left behind were blind midgets....how about then?

nope

 

[suicidalpigeon]

didnt the us law on machine gun purchasing went off for a while and went active again? between that time god knows how many have been shipped to the civilians.

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
didnt the us law on machine gun purchasing went off for a while and went active again? between that time god knows how many have been shipping to the civilians.

Well something like that. I picked up a new M4 just a few weeks ago. Thanks Bush!

 

[QuitBanningMe]

Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
didnt the us law on machine gun purchasing went off for a while and went active again? between that time god knows how many have been shipped to the civilians.

Automatic weapons were never banned. They require special permits.

"Assault" weapons were banned.

Your statement did prove the media works though.

 

[SilentZero]

Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe

Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
didnt the us law on machine gun purchasing went off for a while and went active again? between that time god knows how many have been shipped to the civilians.

Automatic weapons were never banned. They require special permits.

"Assault" weapons were banned.

Your statement did prove the media works though.

Well technically not completely banned, but yeah just not allowed to have certain features (flash suppressor, collapseable stock, magazine > 10 rounds, etc). But I do know a few guys here on Schofield that just bought pre-banned rifles for three times the price.

 

[gUEv]

Originally posted by: wafflesandsyrup
didnt the us law on machine gun purchasing went off for a while and went active again? between that time god knows how many have been shipped to the civilians.

OMG your name is waffles and syrup STFU KTHX

you guys bring these stereotypes on yourselves, you have hockey players on your money ffs...

Originally posted by: SilentZero

Well what if everyone left the U.S. and the only people left behind were blind midgets....how about then?

you have to understand, that even a blind midget has had to become tougher then the average canadian to live in america.