Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: ShadesOfGrey
Originally posted by: Harvey
Michelle Malkin is a mindless neocon twit with nothing to say and far too many words to say it. Her credibility = 0.
Quoting the first words of the blog at the OP's link:
An anonymous tipster sends some intriguing information about the "whiny kids grow up to be conservatives" study conducted by left-wing UC Berkeley prof Jack Block.
Read anything else she's written if you need further convincing that her skull contains two or less neurons in search of an idea.
Just another childish attack on Michelle. Do you do that because you know the study is flawed and want to shift the subject elsewhere? Do you do it just to troll? I am genuinely curious why you and your types resort to this sort of behavior repeatedly.
i'll answer for my "type". this sort of behavior that is being resorted to is called intelligence. i understand it may be difficult to explain this to you. i have legitimate reasons for my attacks on Michelle, as well as my disagreement with you.
had you actually read the study in an unbiased setting, you would realize that it's not actually partisan at all. liberals are the ones who applied this "whining babies" part; there is nothing even remotely like that in the paper. and yet, you attack an honorable person at UC-B instead of going after the liberals who misused the paper. that's called being disingenuous and dishonorable.
your blindness is not limited to just the paper itself. it extends to the larger issue at hand here. you blindly accepted the partisan hackery of this issue, and now are demonstrating stupidity as a result.