airdata
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2010
- 4,987
- 0
- 0
So you're still holding onto him following him is valid reason for an attack that breaks his nose and is continuous for more than a minute while a man screams for help? This attack, due to being followed, is so justified that Z loses all claims to defending himself? Really, that's your argument? Are you British? I know you sure as hell aren't a Texan...
He very well could have been justified in the assault. You guys keep talking about justification for killing trayvon as being Zimmerman's fear for his safety.
Does Trayvon not get the same right? He very well could have feared for his safety with a stranger following him around at night. Obviously it wasn't the police. So who was it? What could they possibly want with him that they'd follow after him in the black of night?
And in that case, who's fear for their safety trumps the other? The guy who is first to fear for their safety? or the guy who made the other person fear for their safety who then got their ass kicked and then feared for their safety despite instigating an altercation w\ the other person in the first place?