And never misunderstand someone giving up on morons as "running"...many of us have been discussing this for months...but of course you know tbat since you're not really "new" here...amiright?
Android is running just like TM did. I guess he feels threatened, like TM did. Good thing this is just the interwebz and I'm not a silly wannabe cop...with a gun.
<snicker>
Agreed...but sometimes the trolls are amusing, so I come back for a laugh...otherwise 100% accurate and justified, like the shot fired that fateful nightAt this point we've posted the facts so many times... repeatedly. People will continue to post in this thread, and ignore the facts. The lynch mob is unrelenting. They want blood for the act of self defense.
Nothing is going to change that.
What we will face here is either a crime against humanity, where a court finishes the assault on Zimmerman that Martin began, or a man will be deemed able to protect himself. I need not tell you which I hope for.
The petty arguments contained herein are an embarrassment to us all. I hereby refuse to feed the trolls and will no longer be posting in this thread except to respond to updates on the case. I suggest you all do the same.
Because of physical evidence and multiple eye witness accounts of martin beating zimmerman on his back.
that right there, and that alone = lawful self defense. Read the law, know it, take a CCDW class and advanced NRA class as I did and you'll understand the laws of your state extremely well. The sheriff and states attorney along with a lawyer familiar with your states laws will explain it all.
That is what makes this such an easy and clear cut case of self defense. There is no doubt.
There are NO eye witness accounts of Martin on Zimmerman beating him. They exist only in your head, please get help.
How about 28 year old - still not finished with any college degree, living off of the money his wife makes, changing jobs, and a guy not really smart enough to not lie to attorneys and lets - no - tells his wife to lie to the judge?
and since you clearly have little to no contact or respect for anyone ages 15-20, particularly black folk - you are probably better off simply ignoring that stuff from now on.
Let's not even discuss the.fact that street signs aren't behind houses...
It is very important that Trayvon ran because that means the reason GZ initially got out of his car was to chase and FOLLOW which we all heard on tape. GZ did not forget why he got out of his car in the first place and even if he did luckily we have real time proof to explain why he exited his vehicle. He was lying when he said he got out to look for a street sign because if the "suspect" as he called him had completely left the area which one would assume after losing sight of them then walking around in the dark with no flashlight looking for something so silly would have been of no value.
Now back to my original point. If Trayvon running is a useless piece of info then Zimmerman would have told it to police just as he related tons of pieces of useless information. The biggest piece of the puzzle is what started TM on his supposed murderous rampage and GZ cannot answer that because then he is squatting on his self defense claim if he does. GZ clearly provoked TM first by following him and then by verbally assaulting him and PHYSICALLY ASSAULTING HIM. You think he despised TM as a suspect and followed him just to encounter him and back down WHILE HE WAS ARMED? NO. Not GZS character who got aggressive with an officer, why not a kid he deemed to be a suspect? Neighbors and DeDe heard a verbal disagreement with GZ saying more than "I don't have a problem." So its clear GZ is lying about something and I dare anyone to say they believe his entire story based on his character...
On to the physical evidence: Where are the grass and mud stains on this jacket and the back of his shoes? Go ahead and look for it....I'll wait..
He made the comment about hoping someone taped it because he knew that hadn't happened, he would have noticed the illumination from the video camera which would be needed to record something in the dark. What he didn't know is TM was on the phone up until the moment the incident happened. That means GZ was behind those houses for so long for some reason other than looking for street signs that didn't exist back there. What do you suppose that reason was?
Oh and stop glossing over the fact that he chased Trayvon...he admitted that on tape.
Further, what is noble about defending a grown ass man that killed an unarmed kid? It's a damned shame that the political affiliation of some makes them more prone to send money to known killers...
You know it's pointless to argue with an alt account right?Just show us the proof and most people will be more than happy to support sending GZ to prison.
Where's the proof that GZ's use of force was unlawful? Where's the proof that GZ acted with a depraved mind?
If you can't, he will never be convicted in this case.
You know it's pointless to argue with an alt account right?
Clearly you cannot read. You cannot provoke an incident then kill someone. GZ knows that, that's why he lying about why he got out of his car and what happened afterwards. Further his superficial injuries and the physical evidence shows he did not have to use deadly force to subdue Martin. According to the law after provoking the encounter he cannot have made the decision to use deadly force as a first recourse which he did because according to his own testimony HE NEVER ATTEMPTED TO FIGHT BACK. So he started simple fist fight with a kid to provoke him and then shot him claiming self defense. That is not the law and why he was charged with murder in the second degree. He is the one who entered the encounter with intent, not Trayvon who we all know was just walking home. He did not morph into a cold blooded candy toting murderer once he left that store.
I think anyone looking at this with a rational mind will come to the conclusion the story doesn't make sense the way GZ tells it. An example. How is he so in fear for his life yet doesn't fight back or remember he has a gun. Where were his hands the whole time?
I think anyone looking at this with a rational mind will come to the conclusion the story doesn't make sense the way GZ tells it. An example. How is he so in fear for his life yet doesn't fight back or remember he has a gun. Where were his hands the whole time? He says TM was covering his mouth with his hands, trying to suffocate him. Why didn't he punch him then, gouge his eyes, dig his nails into his neck, anything? And at the same moment TM saw the concealed weapon that became exposed when not only his jacket but his shirt rode up while on the ground evenn though he was wearing a belt? And he stopped TM from reaching his gun by pressing TM's hand with his arm (the same arm he then reached down to get the gun with). If his gun is at his hip wouldn't that be where TM reached? If he did reach there and u pressed his arm with ur arm how could you have then reached the gun since ur fingers would be lower than the gun at that point. To believe the depiction he made during the reenactment you would have to believe Gz started swiping from under his elbow. why would he do that when he is the one who saw the gun?
His story just isn't plausible. It sounds good but when you get to the nitty gritty, He's lying.