Unarmed black 17 year old shot by Neighborhood watch captain in gated community...

Page 175 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
Are you freaky ignoring zimmermans testimony. 3 times? Without attorney present?

The more that comes out of this keeps proving Zimmerman story.

Stop making shit up in your head.

Not ignoring it at all.

You have Z's testimony. You have T's girlfriends testimony.

The girlfriends testimony of harassment occurred before Z's testimony of an attack.

We have yet to cross examine either but taking them as equal for now potential crime comitted by Z before potential crime comitted by T.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
The family has stated they have given it to the police. I'll take their word. So far only the police have lied in this case. Since I have yet to actually see Z's "sworn testimony" we'll have to stipulate they both have given sworn statements.

T was being harassed by Z. There's your fucking crime.

We haven't seen anybody's "sworn testimony" as far as I am aware.

I also don't see harassment. He was working with the cops and following a supicious person. Doesn't he have that right. Oh, I forgot. That's racist to do because the suspect was black, ergo it must be harassment.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Not ignoring it at all.

You have Z's testimony. You have T's girlfriends testimony.

The girlfriends testimony of harassment occurred before Z's testimony of an attack.

We have yet to cross examine either but taking them as equal for now potential crime comitted by Z before potential crime comitted by T.

As far as I can tell, the harrasment is only proven in the minds of people who are out to lynch Z.
 

OCNewbie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2000
7,603
24
81
...which the 911 operator instructed him not to do.

which 911 operators tell EVERYONE to do in such situations, because it's SOP. It wasn't some uniquely thought out order that took into consideration all the events. Besides, the police dispatcher (wasn't actually a 911 call I think) "suggested" that it wasn't necessary for him to pursue Trayvon, and YES, there is a difference.

Edit: The 911 operators also told the resident witnesses the identical thing "don't go outside", basically. It's just standard operating procedure, nothing unique about it in the slightest.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,289
28,144
136
We haven't seen anybody's "sworn testimony" as far as I am aware.

I also don't see harassment. He was working with the cops and following a supicious person. Doesn't he have that right. Oh, I forgot. That's racist to do because the suspect was black, ergo it must be harassment.

If you were following this case at any level you know that's not true. When did the cops give the ok for Z to track down Z?

The family has stated T's girlfriend has given sworn testimony. We haven't seen Z's either but assuming for now both have so I can answer the question "what crime did Z commit"

What did T do that was suspicious??
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Mr. Zimmerman was a "Neighborhood Watch Captain" which has about the same legal standing as "tattletale", but with somewhat less authority. ...which the 911 operator instructed him not to do.

He was still working with them, not for them but with them.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Here is exactly why I am defending Z until all the facts are in.

The president of the NAACP, Benjamin Jealous, said Lee failed to do his job. "The reality is that this chief had probable cause to lock up a man who shot a boy in cold blood -- because he shot a boy in cold blood -- and he failed to do that," Jealous said.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/22/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html
..

Yoo many people have already tried and convicted him without getting all we can from the known facts.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
which 911 operators tell EVERYONE to do in such situations, because it's SOP. It wasn't some uniquely thought out order that took into consideration all the events. Besides, the police dispatcher (wasn't actually a 911 call I think) "suggested" that it wasn't necessary for him to pursue Trayvon, and YES, there is a difference.

Edit: The 911 operators also told the resident witnesses the identical thing "don't go outside", basically. It's just standard operating procedure, nothing unique about it in the slightest.
I know it's SOP. nobodyknows tried to imply that Mr. Zimmerman was pursuing Mr. Martin under some sort of authority, which I disputed by implication.
 

OCNewbie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2000
7,603
24
81
I know it's SOP. nobodyknows tried to imply that Mr. Zimmerman was pursuing Mr. Martin under some sort of authority, which I disputed by implication.

Gotcha. Everything is so out of order in this thread, makes it hard to follow. I go to reply to someone's post, and I quote it in my message, only this new message I post shows up as happening BEFORE their message that I'm quoting. Confusing.
 

M0RPH

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,305
1
0
What did T do that was suspicious??

I don't think it's too hard to imagine how T could have looked suspicious. Walking slowly, looking around, raising hood when he's spotted by someone, running away. It's easy now with hindsight to say he wasn't doing anything suspicious, but for residents who have been plagued with burglaries, I don't think it's unreasonable for a person to be on the lookout and to find T suspicious.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
I know it's SOP. nobodyknows tried to imply that Mr. Zimmerman was pursuing Mr. Martin under some sort of authority, which I disputed by implication.
I'm saying he can go whereever he likes/wants. Thats how the whole neighborhood watch thing works.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
As this thread veers off on another totally irrelevant tangent.

How does Zimmerman's GF have any legal standing?

Its like saying Zimmerman could have called Joe Blow from Kokoma, and If Joe Blow said its OK, blow him away, Zimmerman would somehow be justified.

It was Zimmerman, Zimmerman, and Zimmerman who pulled the trigger and that is the only fact that matters in what amounts to nothing other than cold blooded murder.

Zimmerman did the crime, and now he must do the time.

Its the only conclusion logically possible.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
Mr. Zimmerman completed his work "with the police" when he placed his call reporting a suspicious person in his neighborhood. After that, he was freelancing.

You act like he was being paid or somethi9ng. He did what he did out of c0poncern for his neighborhood.
 

nobodyknows

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2008
5,474
0
0
As this thread veers off on another totally irrelevant tangent.

How does Zimmerman's GF have any legal standing?

Its like saying Zimmerman could have called Joe Blow from Kokoma, and If Joe Blow said its OK, blow him away, Zimmerman would somehow be justified.

It was Zimmerman, Zimmerman, and Zimmerman who pulled the trigger and that is the only fact that matters in what amounts to nothing other than cold blooded murder.

Zimmerman did the crime, and now he must do the time.

Its the only conclusion logically possible.


Likie I said, so many of you have already tried and convicted him in your heads, The true liberal ideology here is impressive.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |