- Jun 16, 2008
- 8,659
- 491
- 126
So one bad killing that may end up in a prosecution anyway is enough to rewrite the law?
The law is working fine here. It's done a lot to stop lawyers cashing in on when Joey the Gangbanger gets dead and his family all creates individual lawsuits.
Interesting in Boynton Beach recently two people were killed in a home invasion. The police know the house was targeted, but not why...they are reaching out for more police involvement and forming a lawsuit.
They think their boy was the target "he is well-known on the streets, but isn't in any gangs"
It's not just this shooting... I posted the link that suggests that some PDs in Florida don't bother to investigate fully a shooting when the shooter makes a self-defense claim. Instead they just send what they have to the D.A. Any law that ends up with that happening needs to be looked at.
Then there's the shooting of the Army veteran that was brought up in this thread in which there were eye witnesses who actually saw the shooting and the shooter is claiming self-defense.
The writers of the law are trying to claim that their law wasn't meant to apply to situations like this. Yet Mr. Zimmerman was let go as soon as he claimed self-defense. Sounds like there might be a glaring loophole in the law.
The thread has been moving fast and maybe it's easy to miss so....
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com..._law-enforcement-castle-doctrine-deadly-force
Q: How did law enforcement respond to the law?
A: Prosecutors across the state opposed the law before it was enacted Oct. 1, 2005. In the following five months, there were at least 13 shootings in Central Florida where self-defense was claimed. Out of six men killed and four more wounded in the cases, only one was armed. Some Orlando-area police agencies simply stopped investigating shootings involving self-defense claims and referred them directly to state prosecutors to decide.
Thirteen 13 self-defense shootings and of the ones where the shooter his target only 10% were armed? Yeah that really sounds like a good well thought out law.... no wait it really doesn't keep defending it though.
Just the fact that some P.D.s will throw up their arms and just move it up without a full investigation should be the sure sign that it's a bad law...
But I'm sure you'll rationalize some false logical construct in the bizarro world that you seem to occupy that points to it being the law that all states should adopt.