Unarmed black 17 year old shot by Neighborhood watch captain in gated community...

Page 2654 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Then again if GZ FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS given to him by the dispatch, none of this would have happened and why else besides fear would you run off??

No one has proof that he didn't follow the NEN dispatcher's request "we don't need you to do that". If there was proof the prosecution screwed up and didn't present it. The same is true as to who confronted who, if we are to believe Rachel (as well as GZ), TM was the one that confronted GZ and not the other way around.
 

MH2007

Senior member
Jun 26, 2007
830
0
0
If the "Special" prosecutors followed the law they shouldn't have brought charges against GZ. The original DA and SPD knew this so they chose to follow the law. I have no doubt a grand jury would not have indicted GZ either.

All they have/had is speculation, conjecture, innuendo, and emotion, no probable cause whatsoever...period.

The attorneys for the Special Prosecutor were basically sandbaggers (term that a local attorney used to refer to them). They wanted a high profile case because of all the local complaints to them of how they were treating black defendants.

Norm Wolfinger was the local State Attorney. What some people don't know is that his investigators were doing a ton of work to build a case and had the grand jury impaneled for April 10

In my opinion the BDLR realized that using a grand jury might expose Jeantel. The grand jury has investigative powers and if BDLR had to put Jeantel in front of them they might have been able to figure out Crump's involvement in coaxing and shaping her testimony.
 

Darkman

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2013
4,033
0
0
OK .. I'll go have breakfast .. and then go sleep a little bit more ... lol ... - my ex-wife called me and wants me to go out with her later on tonight (we are still friends .. lol .. and have a child together)

So the best for me, maybe, is to get some more Zzz's ...

I guess when I go out .. I might miss the verdict .... - so the jury better be done by about 6 pm or so (or postpone it till the next day)

... if I am sleeping .. I guess they can come with the verdict also ... but I am quite a sensitive sleeper .. - I ll just keep TV on .. with the volume on .. and if I hear THE NOISE .. I ll open my eyes ... hehe
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
The opportunity was created when TM supposedly hid somewhere and jumped out to attack GZ by surprise. This is what GZ says happened. It seems plausible that a violent / troubled teenager would do that.

GZ has said TM jumped out of the bushes in one statement, he said in his re-enactment that he was walking towards him from the side. Which is it? You can't have it both ways.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Then again if GZ FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS given to him by the dispatch, none of this would have happened and why else besides fear would you run off??felt like excising?. All we have are GZ's account of what happened and he's proven his ability to lie and manipulate. How could have planned to "double back and hide", he didn't even know GZ had left the car at that point, more than likely stopped running thinking he'd lost him and started walking and talking on the phone again and GZ's story of "finding and address" is laughable as proved by the prosecutor, there were only three streets in the area and GZ knew the entire neighborhood like the back of his hand but hey, he needed an excuse to explain going after TM and that one fit the bill.

Ok, I will play your game a little.

If TM's dad was not such a dead beat and taken care of his son, none of this would happen.

If TM's mom would taken care of her own son, none of this would happen.

If TM did not come from a broken home (as 72% of black kids are), none of this would happen.

If TM mom and dad did not meet, none of this would happen.

Shall I go on with the IF game?

What do I win? :whiste:

Get back on the topic. The bottom line is the State of Florida did not prove "beyond reasonable doubt" in this case. Period.

Can any of TM supporters say otherwise? Feel free to correct me.
 
Last edited:

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
Her statements indicate that
Martin was by the house of Brandy.
Martin made the decision to then go confront Zimmerman after Zimmerman reappeared
Martin made the first verbal contact.

This is the order that she described what happened from her POV. She was asked by the State to describe what she heard; it did not imply a random order not did the way she explained was in a random order. either side would have asked for clarification if that was the case.

Now a proper logical assumption would be that Martin was also out of Zimmerman's field of vision while he was on the phone to the NEN dispatcher.

I am estimating that that was past the top of the T; Flashlight against the dog baggy stand in the recording.

So Martin was either hiding around the first set of houses (per Zimmerman re-enactment) or down a few units by Brandy's place out of visual range.

It is interesting how Martin would have been able to see Zimmerman and not the reverse unless in a location where he was unable to be observed

First "by his daddy's house" is subjective. Considering his path that night anywhere within 100 meters or so of brandy greens was by his daddy's house.

We also don't know what Zimmerman was doing for a big block of time, he could have been wandering south to look for him.

Did Martin run north to confront him or did he go north while Zimmerman was moving south and they met near John goods back porch?

My point is there is no way to be certain of what you propose as certainty. Because its this slot of time we have the least data on.

It's just as plausible the verbal exchange occurred when they were separated by distance. Zimmerman could have been at the T and Martin could have been 30' south of it.

I certainly know if I was going to speak to a stranger that had been following me I wouldn't engage from close range.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Maybe so.

...so?

The gun is an equalizer. It's a very good and valid reason to feel safer in the performance of his duty...as proven by the encounter.

Was he never armed before? Is that the first time he ever had the gun?



For liability reasons, Neighborhood Watch also cannot have rules that keep you in a potentially dangerous situation. He may have felt a duty to be effective in his role, even if his personal safety was compromised by the decision to follow...AND THAT IS ASSUMING GZ ACTUALLY FOLLOWED TM, WHICH HE CLAIMS HE DID NOT DO AND WE CANNOT PROVE OTHERWISE.

Performance of his duty? he's no cop...he's a cop wanna-be, no doubt about that.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Then again if GZ FOLLOWED THE INSTRUCTIONS given to him by the dispatch, none of this would have happened
Again:
  1. The 911 dispatcher simply said: "We don't need you to do that."
  2. The 911 dispatcher did not say: "DO NOT do that."
  3. Even if the 911 dispatcher did explicitly say not to follow TM, GZ had no legal obligation to not follow TM.
  4. GZ claims he didn't follow TM.

You seem to be saying that TM had more right to roam GZ's neighborhood than GZ himself had.

...and you're wrong about that.

and why else besides fear would you run off??
To get the jump on this "creepy ass cracka" that [was/is/had been] following him...?
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Performance of his duty? he's no cop...he's a cop wanna-be, no doubt about that.

None of which is a crime.

Also I find it both sad and laughable that people call into question his recollection of the evident requiring near perfect recall down to every detail.

I can't even tell you what I ate three days ago, and that wasn't even a life or death event.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
No one has proof that he didn't follow the NEN dispatcher's request "we don't need you to do that". If there was proof the prosecution screwed up and didn't present it. The same is true as to who confronted who, if we are to believe Rachel (as well as GZ), TM was the one that confronted GZ and not the other way around.

I'm personally convinced BRD he got out to follow him and continued to look for him.

The looking for an address meme is laughable frankly.

I do think he shot in self defense I also think he omitted details that would have put him in a negative light.

Like the fact he kept looking for him.
 

MH2007

Senior member
Jun 26, 2007
830
0
0
  1. We can't prove that GZ followed TM. He claims he didn't. Z said he was looking for the closest street sign. Maybe untrue, we just don't know.

There still seems to be some confusion regarding "street sign" and "house number". I'll try to clear things up a bit.

He was on Twin Trees Lane. From where his truck is parked you can't see any of the street signs.

Ironically, in the re-enactment video where BDLR flips out over Zimmerman actually calling the street by name you can clearly see that he is looking at the street sign where Twin Trees and Retreat View Circle meet

When he gets out of his truck to his left are the houses facing RVC. This is what he is referring to when he says the house numbers can't be seen from behind the houses. Whether or not he can see the number on Jenna Lauer's house is a red herring because he doesn't know the name of Twin Trees

Once he gets to the T intersection and the dispatcher says "we don't need you to do that" and he says "okay" the closest house he can get to that he knows the street name is the house at the eastern end of the top of the T intersection. So he goes there to get the number on the front of that house.

One final thing, during the interview of Zimmerman's neighbor she repeatedly refers to Twin Trees Lane as Retreat View Circle. She lived next to Zimmerman and she didn't know the name of the street either.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
I'm personally convinced BRD he got out to follow him and continued to look for him.

The looking for an address meme is laughable frankly.

I do think he shot in self defense I also think he omitted details that would have put him in a negative light.

Like the fact he kept looking for him.

I suspect his "looking for TM" was standing at the end of the walk looking down the street towards the rear entrance hoping to see TM head out like those before him.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
I suspect his "looking for TM" was standing at the end of the walk looking down the street towards the rear entrance hoping to see TM head out like those before him.

Maybe, there is nothing to suggest otherwise, outside of the body and most of the evidence locations.

we have to believe he stumbled shimmied 20-30 feet. vs started off further south. Either are possible given the evidence.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
I guess you could say that about every single effective neighborhood watch coordinator, couldn't you?

No actually, most I would imagine do it within the guidelines of NHW. and do not go that extra step of carrying a weapon and getting out of their car to follow people.
 

MH2007

Senior member
Jun 26, 2007
830
0
0
GZ was justifiably suspicious of TM. The target of suspicion can be referred to as a "suspect." That was an appropriate term. It means you have not made a solid conclusion about the actions or intentions of the person.

Keep in mind that Zimmerman at that time claimed he didn't know Martin was dead and may have assumed that Martin was the one who was going to end up being charged with assault. The injuries that Zimmerman sustained, while not in a literal sense life-threatening, are commonly used by prosecutors as a basis to charge ADW (assault with a deadly weapon) likely to cause GBI (great bodily injury).
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,931
7,980
136
We also don't know what Zimmerman was doing for a big block of time, he could have been wandering south to look for him.

No evidence of Zimmerman being south of the T before the assault.

Those two minutes? Maybe he was sitting by the street waiting for a sign of movement. Maybe he was scared to cross back towards his truck. We just don't know.

There IS evidence of movement towards the T, around the time TM saw GZ and then spoke to GZ. When TM confronted GZ at the T.
 

Darkman

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2013
4,033
0
0
anyone who posts in this thread other than to ridicule it is a true clown themselves
Lucky for you (j/k) I am going to sleep now ... lol ....

but I fixed "anyhow" to "anyone" in my original post ... thanks to noticing my typo in your post ..

So .. thanks
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
I think they have one possibly two hold outs and the others are trying to convince them by discussing the evidence/testimony piece by piece. They adjoined to give the hold out some time to think it over and start off fresh this morning.

This is my guess.

I don't think the time they are takings indicates verdict. However, I think it does indicate that this jury doesn't see a not guilty as plainly as most of us did. I blame this indecision on the fact that the jury is not aware of the history of delinquent behavior of Trayvon. To me him attacking GZ fits that history, but without it I would be more inclined to doubt the defense's story.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
No actually, most I would imagine do it within the guidelines of NHW. and do not go that extra step of carrying a weapon and getting out of their car to follow people.

They probably aren't very effective if they don't keep eyes on a suspicious person as long as they can.
 

Attic

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2010
4,282
2
76
GZ has said TM jumped out of the bushes in one statement, he said in his re-enactment that he was walking towards him from the side. Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

Basically a surprise attack on a very dark night. Minor inconsistences are expected. You are aware that someone giving multiple statements with absolutely no inconsistences is most likely lying?

Are you of the type where you are willing to use a double standard to go after GZ? In so far as you insist he's guilty, then if GZ gives no inconsistences in multiple accounts then you would assert he is lying due to the above knowledge. Whereas if he gives some inconsistences, as he has, then he is still intentionally lying and guilty.

How do you reconcile your perception vs the professionals involved who disagree with you?

Bottom line inconsistences have been covered and do not meaningfully detract from the honesty GZ has shown regarding what occurred that night.
 

lotus503

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2005
6,502
1
76
No evidence of Zimmerman being south of the T before the assault. I agree, however there is substantial evidence south of the T. he either shimmed there, stumbled there or started closer to there, we just don't know.

Those two minutes? Maybe he was sitting by the street waiting for a sign of movement. Maybe he was scared to cross back towards his truck. We just don't know. True we don't know

There IS evidence of movement towards the T, around the time TM saw GZ and then spoke to GZ. When TM confronted GZ at the T. It could have been towards the T. Martin did have to move north at all, he could have been 30 feet south where his body was the entire time.

responses in bold
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |