Hey .. I found the dude's original channel on YouTube .. this dude is great!Or watch it directly on YouTube .. HERE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sL2f0PoqME
----
I see that YouTube uploader has 2 freshly posted videos ... from the same guy ... from 7 hours ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCDvmv3RkmY - No Hope; No Change For The Blacks Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsUo5t8s3-U - No Hope; No Change For Blacks Part 2
Where's the proof that TM punched GZ? On TM's fucking knuckles.
Lol...you are naive , and naive people in a jury are a blessing
for criminals who claims being innocents.
Of course , you wont be naive if the yet to be convicted
guy has your skin color , as is often the case in the US.
Lol...you are naive , and naive people in a jury are a blessing
for criminals who claims being innocents.
You never prove any of your hypotheticals. Problem is, in our system, facts must support a claim beyond a reasonable doubt that so and so acted such a way. So ponder away. I claim UFO's captured Zimmerman took over his mind and made him shoot.
I stayed in the field of reasonable possibility...
Anyway , Florida law is too advantageous to murderers
when there s no precise witnesses , that is , the murderer
will be systematicaly given the benefit of the doubt as the
burden of proof is on the deads shoulders , a total nonsense ,
a complete reversal of the usual way to instruct such a problem.
There is about 36 so called justifiable murders per year
in this retarded state , i wonder how much is the rate
for others US states.
All I ask is proof and you have provided none.
I don't give a fuck at all about race. It's about right to self defense.
As i pointed the foolish state of florida puts the burden
of proof on the state...
I guess that whoever find himself embarked in such a story
will forcibly try to escape from life sentence , whatever
the truth about his supposed guiltiness.
As i pointed the foolish state of florida puts the burden
of proof on the dead party...
I guess that whoever find himself embarked in such a story
will forcibly try to escape from life sentence , whatever
the truth about his supposed guiltiness.
I agree. Early in this thread I said that no duty retreat law was stupid. But this case is about self defense since zimmerman, by evidence presented, could not escape. How to change that? At what point in a beating do you think someone can use deadly force?
I am open to suggestions. I hate that this kid got killed and wish to avoid crap like this.
You're an idiot.
So, you're basically saying that it's our fault people are racist bigots?
Frankly , i have no solutions when it comes to the US
because the cultural adoration of weapons is linked ,
wrong or right , to security , and this belief is deeply
entrenched in the USans psyché since the times of
west conquest.
Surely that places like Frisco which have the reputation
to be close to european standards would be capable
to accomodate firearms ban laws but we can be sure that
the , well , hillbillies and other southerners will make
it an existential issue and will derail any law well
before it s even proposed.
For the record , i doubt that your neighbouring Canada
has such permitive laws , yet , i v also no doubt that
it s not a country as violent as the US and surely
close to European standards.
Where i live , in France , homicide rate is 1.1 for 100 000 people ,
a high rate for Europe but still less than a quarter of the US one ,
so it makes no doubt that firearms kills more than they protect
in countries where they are legal.
Justice is not perfect. In the end the law of self-defense is about reasonableness. If a person reasonably perceives a serious threat of harm, and uses force to meet that threat, the law justifies force and up to deadly force. If a DA or Jury agrees with that based on facts he's let go. Really man watch that Captain Alexis' testimony man he taught the self defense law and states clearly three possibility with examples. So yeah if you can concoct a story with evidence that jury believes is reasonable I you will be let go. Our system is setup also to let many guilty go free so less innocent get convinced with presumption of innocence. So state must prove you are full of it.
Remind me, how many days is Muslims riot in your streets burning cars, buildings and assaulting people? If you can't remember I can look it up.
Look it up , it will help you get rid of your prejudices...
and spare us OT from an obvious hater..
Frankly , i have no solutions when it comes to the US
because the cultural adoration of weapons is linked ,
wrong or right , to security , and this belief is deeply
entrenched in the USans psyché since the times of
west conquest.
Surely that places like Frisco which have the reputation
to be close to european standards would be capable
to accomodate firearms ban laws but we can be sure that
the , well , hillbillies and other southerners will make
it an existential issue and will derail any law well
before it s even proposed.
For the record , i doubt that your neighbouring Canada
has such permitive laws , yet , i v also no doubt that
it s not a country as violent as the US and surely
close to European standards.
Where i live , in France , homicide rate is 1.1 for 100 000 people ,
a high rate for Europe but still less than a quarter of the US one ,
so it makes no doubt that firearms kills more than they protect
in countries where they are legal.
Abwx's utopia without "archaic" US lawns. LMAO.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_civil_unrest_in_France
London has gun bans and higher homicide rates than ever and comparable to any US city. You'll find homicide rates track "diversity" more than anything - gun or no gun. All you do by removing gun is allowing the more vicous bigger stronger people to rule streets with homicide rather than level playing field. Problem is tribalism. Is same problem for violence going on everywhere in ME to africa to USA sadly. IMO trayvon probably had a chip on his shoulder about whites same for zimmerman about blacks so instead "what can i do for you sir" "oh nothing I'm just neighborhood watch and wondering who you are" it became confrontational right off the bat and lead to a homicide. All this violence can be avoid with respect and decency to each other. Until that happens we are fucked. Gun or no gun.
You are a coward, liar and dishonest. You should be ashamed of yourself and despite what you post here, I know deep down that you are.
Yes he would. Testimony from doctors, eyewitness' and evidence seems to support TM was committing assault and battery upon Zimmerman. No way he would have been found not guilty otherwise but a murderer.
Don't bring logic and reason into this.
London has gun bans and higher homicide rates than ever and comparable to any US city. You'll find homicide rates track "diversity" more than anything - gun or no gun. All you do by removing gun is allowing the more vicous bigger stronger people to rule streets with homicide rather than level playing field. Problem is tribalism. Is same problem for violence going on everywhere in ME to africa to USA sadly. IMO trayvon probably had a chip on his shoulder about whites same for zimmerman about blacks so instead "what can i do for you sir" "oh nothing I'm just neighborhood watch and wondering who you are" it became confrontational right off the bat and lead to a homicide. All this violence can be avoid with respect and decency to each other. Until that happens we are fucked. Gun or no gun.