Why? Once charges are brought to bear they can extricate him from most countries. Also, that would then look like he now has something to hide.
Zimmerman should've left the country before he was charged.
Zimmerman should've left the country before he was charged.
To nitpick, "Wherefore art thou"...
"I do not think it means what you think it means" to paraphrase another priceless work of entertainment.
Try googling to see what that means and let us know when you've completed freshman English in high school. It's one thing to fat finger a misspelling. It's another to completely use the wrong phrase.
You are just too dense to get the mangled meaning of "where forth arth thou." Guess or certainty? Certain!
Went to school did you" Never learnt to think? LOL
He should've gone to Peru and burned all his identification, credit cards, etc and walked up into the mountains to beg for a job milking goats or something.
He was legally free to go.
And I do think he is being unfairly, illegally pursued by the American justice system. He does have a reason to fear for his life.
There is no indication at all that he broke the law that night, or broke any reasonable person's moral code either.
So why is he being prosecuted? Mob rule, political pressure, ignorance of the evidence and of the law. Racial side-taking, bloodlust, stupidity. It really is that simple. Subtract those factors, charges never brought.
If.they can convict Drew Peterson on hearsay only then surely they can convict Zimmerman on his own testimony on the 911 tape before the murder where he expressea disdain and admits to chasing someone who was eventually found dead. Justice will prevail for Trayvon like it prevailed for Ms. Savio who "fought back" against her murderer by telling someone before she was killed that something dangerous was happening to her. Trayvon told someone else as well and she is a witness to Zimmermans pursuit of Trayvon which led to Trayvons murder.
LOL, I'm not too dense. I'm pointing out your improper use of a very popular phrase that people use to "sound smart" only makes you sound dumber. Especially so on the internet where all we know you by are words. A proper analogy would be that It's like you are trying to wear a monocle and ascot in public to make yourself seem affluent and smart. When all it does is make you look retarded. Not that you need to show it even more as your other posts already do a fine job of that.
If.they can convict Drew Peterson on hearsay only then surely they can convict Zimmerman on his own testimony on the 911 tape before the murder where he expressea disdain and admits to chasing someone who was eventually found dead. Justice will prevail for Trayvon like it prevailed for Ms. Savio who "fought back" against her murderer by telling someone before she was killed that something dangerous was happening to her. Trayvon told someone else as well and she is a witness to Zimmermans pursuit of Trayvon which led to Trayvons murder.
I caught this posting from talk left. I'm not a fan of the conservative treehouse. But, I did read it and it got me thinking. Is GZ the guest author? My reasoning. His first post had a lot of quotes like his therealgeorgezimmerman.com website. Secondly there are a lot of details provided by the guest author that only he, his wife or the ostermans would know.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com...n-book-and-the-dangers-of-misplaced-advocacy/
I think there's two points that make it impossible to say.
1. The circumstances that led to their encounter could change the applicability of the statutes related to self-defense in a couple of ways. 1. Which self-defense statute applies ? There's more than one and they aren't the same. 2. A jury's decision as to how the circumstances might preclude self-defense as a reasonable possibility.
2. Assuming Zimmerman was telling the truth and did fear for his life, was that what a reasonable person would have thought ? Given the minor injuries, his undeniable mistakes and/or over-reactions, I think its an open question to be decided by a jury.
Now, that ignores the high beyond a reasonably doubt standard, add that to the equation and maybe the uncertainty is in his favor.
Actually they found an undisclosed passport in a bank I believe. Undisclosed meaning he didn't give it up meaning he was keeping it in case he decided to flee meaning yes.. he was a potential flight risk.
Pretty sure it was in his lawyers possession, not hidden in a bank.
I saw an article today in the Orlando Sentinel that said O'Mara was going after TM's school records.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...1_trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-mark-o-mara
I read the actual print article; I haven't read the above. I presume it's the same.
They won't get those records and anything they gather from the web won't help them either. The boys accounts had already been hacked so anything gathered would be considered tainted. And if this is their stragedy you can already cue up the plea deal. Nothing has been shown or even leaked that would support GZ's claim of why he was suspicious. We all know why he was and unfortunately that reason ain't good enough.
They won't get those records and anything they gather from the web won't help them either. The boys accounts had already been hacked so anything gathered would be considered tainted. And if this is their stragedy you can already cue up the plea deal. Nothing has been shown or even leaked that would support GZ's claim of why he was suspicious. We all know why he was and unfortunately that reason ain't good enough.
7-11 tape showing drugged out thug is evidence of suspicious thug.
Tox screen only showed small amount marijuana use. Not recent use either.
It was found in his blood, he smoked recently. Full results haven't been released yet...wonder why that is?