TerryMathews
Lifer
- Oct 9, 1999
- 11,473
- 2
- 0
So lets summarize the thread.
- Trayvon should have ran home because there was an armed assailant on the loose who was an imminent threat to him.
- George Zimmreman acted irattionally, recklessly, and irresponsibly in dealing with the situation at hand.... but despite all of his poor decisions... he didan't actually break a law. He just showed that he was a dumb ass who probably should never have been licensed to own or carry a firearm to begin with.
- Trayvon was once found to have jewelery and a screw driver which he claimed was not even his. He had no charges pressed against him and no crime was proven to happen.
- George Zimmerman left his car to follow/chase Trayvon. After the dispatcher told him they didn't need him to follow, Zimmerman spent the next 2-3 minutes " not following " but somehow still managed to meet up w\ Trayvon despite the fact he was " Not following " according to the prosecution testifiying under oath that they had no evidence he continued to follow.
He simply spent 2-3 minutes getting the nerve to go back to his car from which he was only 10-15 seconds away from when he acknowledge following Trayvon.... But there's no proof he was following him still. He just had his flash light in hand walking around because he was not following or looking for anybody.- The only evidence Trayvon went after Zimmerman is from a witness who's testimony would also prove Zimmerman gave a false statement to police and whatever related tampering with evidence charges would go along with it.
To your last bullet specifically, if you are correct why isn't he charged with it?