DrunkenSano
Diamond Member
- Aug 8, 2008
- 3,892
- 490
- 126
A story like this is not going to change anyone's mind. We all know Trump is a womanizer, that's not news to his supporters or his critics, and guilt by association is not a valid argument.
All this will do is create another partisan fight, which is the environment that Trump thrives in.
There are a few Howard Stern E! show interviews from the early 2000s with Trump. There are no revelations about his character that were not on full display in those interviews.
If I remember correctly, in one of them they talk about whether or not Melania is good in bed.
IMO cruising for JB with Epstein the human trafficker or sexually assaulting 22 women isn't going to gain him any female votes, but it very well could cost him many. This isn't about his base, they are broken human beings who have sold out to a cult. It's the voters in the middle with no ideological loyalties. Doing what he can to avoid the topic, or manufacturing a crisis to bury it, is in his interest.
Every one of those "in the middle" people that I know (and it's quite a bit), have seemingly been able to look past all this dirt being brought to light. They will reference "the economy" and how "socialism is bad". They will say they do not like Trump the person at all, but like what is happening politically and economically under his administration. More so, they "fear" the "radical left" and "Bernie". They despise AOC and what she says. These people are willing to look past the PERSON that is President and what he did (or what CNN says he did)
And you believe Trump's disavow?So...footage of Trump with Epstein who since he has disavowed, are saying things no one can discern and pointing.
Thats fucking incriminating!
Meaning if Obama were recorded in a room with a at the time known underage sex trafficker at a party thrown for him you would have called for jail yesterday.Meaning?
There are a few Howard Stern E! show interviews from the early 2000s with Trump. There are no revelations about his character that were not on full display in those interviews.
If I remember correctly, in one of them they talk about whether or not Melania is good in bed.
In the 2004 interview with Stern, Trump tells the host that "My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka," to which Stern interjects, “by the way, your daughter.” Trump finishes Stern’s sentence by repeating “she’s beautiful.”
“Can I say this? A piece of ass,” Stern says in the clip. “Yeah,” Trump replies.
In another clip uncovered by CNN, this one from 2006, Stern asks Trump, “did your daughter get breast implants?” The real estate mogul replied that “no, she didn’t. I mean, I would know if she did. The answer is no. Why, did she look a little more stacked?”
“She looks more voluptuous than ever,” Stern said.
“No, she didn’t get them,” Trump said. “She’s actually always been very voluptuous.”
You completely ignore that this proves Turmp to be a liar with regards to comments he's made about his relationship with Epstein. That's what this video is meant to accomplish. Its not about revealing any of that other nonsense you're saying. This is just providing some proof that Turmp is lying with regards to his connection to Epstein. Yes, this is a relatively small lie, but we've seen it often lead to more reveals.
Every one of those "in the middle" people that I know (and it's quite a bit), have seemingly been able to look past all this dirt being brought to light. They will reference "the economy" and how "socialism is bad". They will say they do not like Trump the person at all, but like what is happening politically and economically under his administration. More so, they "fear" the "radical left" and "Bernie". They despise AOC and what she says. These people are willing to look past the PERSON that is President and what he did (or what CNN says he did)
Then there's this tidbit between him and Stern.
I had a friend say he just couldn't trust Hilary in 2016. Over trump of all people?!?
A story like this is not going to change anyone's mind. We all know Trump is a womanizer, that's not news to his supporters or his critics, and guilt by association is not a valid argument.
All this will do is create another partisan fight, which is the environment that Trump thrives in.
Everytime I see comments like this, it makes me shake my head at how obtuse to the fact that you've been duped by right wing rhetoric and Turmp himself.Everytime I see comments like this, it makes me shake my head at how obtuse to the fact that you've been duped by right wing rhetoric and Turmp himself.
Because that's how you view every story, in how it affects the narrative that Turmp has put forth. You completely ignore that this proves Turmp to be a liar with regards to comments he's made about his relationship with Epstein. That's what this video is meant to accomplish. Its not about revealing any of that other nonsense you're saying. This is just providing some proof that Turmp is lying with regards to his connection to Epstein. Yes, this is a relatively small lie, but we've seen it often lead to more reveals.
Just like how Turmp said he never even met some of the women who have accused him of groping and other assault, only for pictures of the two of them to be revealed. Same with the Russians and the NRA/Republicans. Same with the woman who established the massage parlor that Robert Kraft visited. Same with lots of "guilt by association" where these people claim to have no idea who someone is "never met them" and similar claims, wherein this forces them to confront a bit more truth. Obviously they just move to some new lie, but that's the thing with liars, the more lies they have to fabricate the more likely they'll be got dead to rights.
You say it doesn't matter, but this stuff has often led to ramifications. Hell, the Stormy Daniels stuff which people said the same thing about, flipped Cohen. And many of the others has led to other horrible people's political careers being ruined because it eventually led to them being properly investigated (Turmp used similar dismissals with most of those "oh they just got the coffee" and then often like a week later they're out because its queued up a full on investigation of their behavior and more damning stuff comes out). Yes, it hasn't taken Turmp down yet, but it is further verified evidence of his lies. They will eventually do him in, unless people like you keep saying well it doesn't matter which actually enables his base to ignore it, because you're effectively saying it means nothing.
George Nader, who was a key witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe, has been charged in a new federal indictment with transporting a 14-year-old boy for sex, child porn, and carrying obscene materials into the United States.
while looking at a NFL cheerleader...“Look at her, back there.… She’s hot.”
What makes you think his base would leave over a little pedo party. They would say the 14 year old asked for it
Trumps past is catching up with him....Hopefully evfentually Republicans will grow some balls and call a spade a spade!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/unearthed-nbc-footage-appears-show-121514718.html
Donald Trump claims he never liked Jeffrey Epstein—but footage unearthed by NBC News certainly shows the two of them having a good time together.
The 1992 video shows a wild-haired Trump with Epstein at Mar-a-Lago, apparently pointing at and discussing young women who are dancing close to them. The women were reportedly cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills, who were in town for a game against the Miami Dolphins.
While their discussion is pretty much inaudible, at one point Trump is seen pointing toward the women and appears to say in Epstein’s ear: “Look at her, back there.… She’s hot.” Epstein appears to agree, then Trump says something else that makes Epstein double up with laughter.
The footage was apparently shot for a talk-show profile of Trump’s lifestyle following his then-recent divorce. The party was thrown a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to felony prostitution charges in Florida. The rest of the video shows Trump dancing exuberantly surrounded by women.
The video is from the same year in which it’s claimed Trump hosted a party with a guest list made up of just himself, Epstein, and “28 girls,” which was reported by The New York Times.
Trump said of his relationship with Epstein last week: “I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him .. I was not a fan.”
However, Trump told New York magazine in 2002 that Epstein was “a terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with,” adding: “It is even said that [Epstein] likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Trump has refused to reveal what led to a “falling out” that he claims to have had with the financier about 15 years ago.
Federal prosecutors indicted Epstein this month, charging him with sex trafficking and accusing him of using his fortune to “create a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit.”
No matter what Trump does or say the standard reply for defending his fabulously irritating abrasive divisive rants is nothing more than dismissive garbage salad.
Trump's supporters just may as well take an example from Trump's childish behavior and simply reply in defense of Trump's racist hate filled remarks with "Nyah-nyah-nuh-nyah-nyah hasn't Trump pissed you off enough yet? Want more?".
It's as good as anything else they've come up with in defense of their cult leader.
oh stfu, but you still support Bill Clinton who attend how many pedo parties? with epstine?
And subsequently showed them the correct way to spell epstine?Have you notified the appropriate legal authorities about this?
TRIGGERED!!!what exactly does this do for you? a rich guy was at a party with another rich guy almost 30 years ago and he was caught on video looking at NFL cheerleader eye candy. wow thats some damning shit dude.