Unigine Valley 1.0 Benchmark Thread ** Post your scores**

[Sohaltang]

Anyone clocked a fury or better yet a fury X? I picked up a used one for $420 and was trying to figure out what gains I will see over my 780TI thats still sitting at the second fastest card on the results list.. Can the OP also update the results?

 

[COSWORTHWRC]

The SLI is working on this setup I had a score over 80fps but things went bad. All seems ok now but cannot start farcry4 in fullscreen, I need to start windowed then change to fullscreen in game???? ANy Ideas???

I'm not sure how to post Image ?

 

[Teizo]

New MSI GTX 970 Gaming 100ME @ +200 core and +500 vram giving me a boosted core clock of 1542mhz and 8000mhz memory. I forgot to click the max vcore voltage reading taking the snapshot, but it was 1.24v, and load temp was only 62c which is amazing using the user fan curve in Afterburner.

67.4 fps

Not as much as my 760 SLI set up, but the minimums are not that much worse, and overall very close to stock 760 SLI (78fps). I can game at 1440p Ultra, 4xMSAA @ 60+ fps now though, which I could not before, so I'll take the trade off.

 

[Teizo]

Last submission. This is all it has. 1552mhz core, and 8400mhz vram. 1562 core had artifacts and or crash, and 8500mhz vram had artifacts. Fan was left to the default values in the Afterburner fan curve. The heatsink/fan on this MSI 970 100ME (and Gaming as well) is really good. Anyone looking to get a 970 should really give this card good consideration.

69.4 fps w/included screenshot this time

 

[Mercennarius]

Just picked up a MSI R9 280X, what should I expect to score with this on Valley? Thanks.

 

[Teizo]

Well, Newegg had the MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G on sale for $450, which was a deal I could not turn down. Thankfully they worked out a deal for me to return the MSI GTX 970 100ME with no restocking and free return shipping, so now I got the card I originally wanted at a price I felt was reasonable.

I probably could push this card a tad further, but during this run the core did throttle down to 1528 for a few frames, so this is about as far as I can go using Afterburner. Memory could probably go up to 8400mhz, but I am not going to worry with it. That would give me maybe 2-3 more fps if my core would run at 1552mhz.

This thread is not a popular as it used to be it seems, but I'll share my results because this 980 overclocked to 1542/8200 is on par with my old 760 SLI set up, but runs smoother.

81.5 fps

MSI GTX 980 Gaming 4G @ 1542/8200, with CPU @ 4.2ghz and DRAM @ 2200mhz

 

[torlen11cc]

Well, I got my R9 390 8GB NITRO a couple days ago and first thing I did was run some benchmarks.

I was thinking about doing a big overclock, but a core clock speed of 1120MHz and a memory clock speed of 1550MHz were above and beyond my requirements.
In fact, I don't see a need to do an overclock on this graphics card when it has to do with games, the 390 knows how to cope with any game today at a stock frequency on 1080P.

Score:

 

[Anubis]

Zotax 980TI AMP running stock at the moment

for gigles i did this at 3440*1440 as well as its native to what i run

 

[Idylhours]

 

[james1701]

Just picked up a Sapphire Nitro R9 Fury at stock clocks, and testing 3770K at stock clocks.

 

[james1701]

Not bad for stock clocks on everything 4138x1250.

 

[OVerLoRDI]

I'm kinda disappointed, this isn't that big of an increase vs my dual 7970 rig. However, I suppose my 7970s did have outrageous overclocks. Also I bet if the test was run at 1440p the difference would be much higher.

old 2x 7970 1275/1500

new(ish) 2x 290x 1125/1250

 

[mohit9206]

Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0

FPS:
11.8
Score:
495
Min FPS:
8.0
Max FPS:
20.8
System

Platform:
Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G630 @ 2.70GHz (2693MHz) x2
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 10.18.13.5582 (1024MB) x1 1006mhz gpu
Settings

Render:
Direct3D11
Mode:
1600x888 8xAA windowed
Preset
Custom
Quality
Ultra

 

[thesmokingman]

I'm kinda disappointed, this isn't that big of an increase vs my dual 7970 rig. However, I suppose my 7970s did have outrageous overclocks. Also I bet if the test was run at 1440p the difference would be much higher.

old 2x 7970 1275/1500

new(ish) 2x 290x 1125/1250

7970s can fly thru this bench!

 

[AdamK47]

Ran the benchmark today with the Extreme HD preset. 162.00 fps
6950X @ 4.0GHz w/ cache @ 3.5GHz
32GB DDR4 @ 3000 w/ 15-15-15-35-2T timings
Two GTX 1080s @ +100 core / +100 memory

 

[rgallant]

Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0

FPS:130.0
Score:5441
Min FPS:43.3
Max FPS:216.6
System

Platform:Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz (3500MHz) x4
GPU model:NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 10.18.13.5906 (3072MB) x2
Settings

Renderirect3D11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
PresetExtreme HD
Powered by UNIGINE Engine
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013

after seeing adam47's score thought I'd take these old gtx780's for a spin
stock bios @ 1215 &1228 per msi-ab
memory at 7114

cpu @ 4.6
GPU temps 33c

 

[KyleGates]

5930k
64GB DDR4
EVGA GTX 1080 ftw x2 SLi

http://www.tgupdate.com/images/2016UValleyXHD.jpg

 

[olds]