Unigine Valley Benchmark

[BallaTheFeared]

So fast :\

 

[Th3SurroundGame]

Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0 - Nvidia Surround - GTX 480 SLI

One of the more beautiful benchmarks to grace the benchmarking scene. :thumbsup:

 

[Mir96TA]

1280x1024? It's standard to run it in extreme HD mode.

Let me switch to Extreme Mode.
But Can't bump up the Res! That is Max my monitor support!

 

[Face2Face]

Let me switch to Extreme Mode.
But Can't bump up the Res! That is Max my monitor support!

You have a Beast of a card for that resolution

 

[Mir96TA]

You have a Beast of a card for that resolution

Well, thank you........... :\
Once I will earn enough Bitcoin out of it to buy infamouse Koren $400 display........ I have to live with SamSung Tube Monitor

 

[guskline]

FPS:81
Score:3389
Min FPS:27.5
Max FPS:153.3

System

Platform:Windows 8
CPU model:Intel I7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
GPU model:NVIDIA EVGA GTX 670 FTW x2

Settings

RenderDirect3D11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
PresetExtreme HD

 

[Mir96TA]

Well, thank you........... :\
Once I will earn enough Bitcoin out of it to buy infamouse Koren $400 display........ I have to live with SamSung Tube Monitor

You have a Beast of a card for that resolution

Here are with Ultra Setting!

 

[Mir96TA]

 

[ad3pt7]

 

[AdamK47]

Decided to turn off the C-states on my CPU to see what would happen. Gave me a bit of a bump. I even have lower clocks on the Titans for this test.

Got 123.6 with 314.14 drivers / driver defaults / +125 core +250 memory

Now I get 132.0 with 314.14 drivers / driver defaults / +100 core +50 memory

Only difference is that the C-states are off. Go figure.

 

[james1701]

One of these days, I might overclock my GPU.

 

[Durvelle27]

 

[njdevilsfan87]

Best result so far, 1228/3750 clocks. I'm slightly unstable at 1228 core. I've only got about a 50/50 chance of completing the benchmark. Memory is also near it's limit with that massive overclock, though I believe I can pull off +800.

This is running under water with the 1.212v, 115% power limit modded bios. So close to the magical 80fps on single card.

 

[bleucharm28]

Here's mine maxed on everything. no oc on card, just cpu.

image hosting sites

 

[Deaks2]

Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0

FPS:
78.7
Score:
3293
Min FPS:
36.2
Max FPS:
158.3
System

Platform:
Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz (3400MHz) x4
GPU model:
AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series 12.100.17.0 (3072MB) x2
Settings

Render:
Direct3D11
Mode:
1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Preset
Extreme HD

 

[exar333]

Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0

FPS: 56.7
Score: 2371
Min FPS: 28.1
Max FPS: 107.1

Render:
Direct3D11
Mode:
1600x900 8xAA windowed
Preset
Extreme
Powered by UNIGINE Engine
Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013

It will not allow me to run the 'Extreme HD' in windowed mode, so I can only so the 'Extreme' preset.

Edit: Interestingly enough - max memory on Extreme is ~1300MB.

 

[Kenmitch]

Latest beta drivers

HD 7870 running at 1265/1450 cards max it looks like

I just run my card at 1200/1425

 

[Termie]

HD7870 Crossfire @1000/1200 benched on my 3770k.

 

[MBrown]

So I after having some stabilty issues at 1200/1425, I bumped it back down to 1150/1425, but I was able to get my CPU stable at 4.5GHz from 4.3GHz which seemed to bring up my min FPS. BTW, I thought these 7950 BEs were supposed to be on par with the 670s and faster when OCed, but looking at some of the 670 results, they are blowing to 7950s away. Is this bench that much geared toward Nvidia cards or are they really that much faster?

Sapphire 7950 @ 1150/1425 | i5 2500k @ 4.5

 

[spinejam]

Sapphire 7950 Dual-X:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[Termie]

So I after having some stabilty issues at 1200/1425, I bumped it back down to 1150/1425, but I was able to get my CPU stable at 4.5GHz from 4.3GHz which seemed to bring up my min FPS. BTW, I thought these 7950 BEs were supposed to be on par with the 670s and faster when OCed, but looking at some of the 670 results, they are blowing to 7950s away. Is this bench that much geared toward Nvidia cards or are they really that much faster?

Sapphire 7950 @ 1150/1425 | i5 2500k @ 4.5

Valley performs much better on Nvidia. My OC'd GTX670 (which scores 45.8fps) is 35% faster than my OC'd HD7870 in Valley, but only about 20% faster in games.

 

[Face2Face]

Valley performs much better on Nvidia. My OC'd GTX670 (which scores 45.8fps) is 35% faster than my OC'd HD7870 in Valley, but only about 20% faster in games.

This is true. Although I haven't seen many GTX 670's get 50+FPS on this bench. Is more likely with a good clocking 7950. I managed to squeeze 52.6 FPS out of mine. But I am on the verge of killing my card

 

[Face2Face]

Has anyone noticed and increase of AVG FPS - When they increase their CPU and System memory clocks?

 

[p_monks33]

Not too terrible with a couple of mid range cards. Must resist urge to buy 2x 670's or a Titan.

 

[blackened23]

Has anyone noticed and increase of AVG FPS - When they increase their CPU and System memory clocks?

CPU speed definitely influences the overall score, yes. It isn't as pronounced as it is in 3dmark, though - in 3dmark11 for instance, the difference between SB-E and IB is around 200-300 points in favor of the SB-E.