- Oct 1, 2014
- 1,074
- 1
- 0
Excellent post Rider. Not a single one of our politicians has proposed anything viable because they care first about their political career and last about the people. Getting into Congress is a sweet deal for most. It's $150,000 a year to do nothing and then when you get out you pick up a $500,000 deal at some company that they passed bills for or who wants them to get bills passed for them.
It's a huge conflict of interest.
Look at where the following guys went
Eric Cantor - $2.8 million dollar deal his first year out at a Bank.
Trent Lott John Breax - Lobbyists at a Russian bank who are being hammered by US sanctions. Odds are they're making millions.
Jim DeMint - Works at think tank Heritage Foundation for $1.2 million.
This is their motivation. They want the fat checks. They don't want to work for the people of the USA. I'm sure lots of them are qualified for these other jobs btw. What they aren't qualified for though is leading the USA.
It works in reverse too. You get senators who worked for big banks who then get into congress to influence policy for those big banks.
Jon Corzine did a 4 year stint in Congress after working for Goldman Sachs plus another 4 years as Governor. What were his big accomplishments? I'm no expert so this guy might have been a-ok but since when are we going to get anything done in this country if you only elect ex CEO's of banks or lawyers?
Another example is John Yarmuth who joined congress so that he could help his brother's healthcare business and increase his own personal wealth in that business.
Then just look at, arguably, the most powerful leader in Europe. Angela Merkel. She was a published Physicist before becoming a politician. She did research in Quantum Chemistry. No comparison.
I would like to see your idea implemented by people who are not politicians but who have traveled and studied foreign systems. The problem that I see today is that Americans simply don't understand that there are 37 other countries out there with better healthcare systems than them. We should be true innovators, sure, but start with what works from other countries and make something better that would work for us. These simple things like a national computer system for prescription medication and medical records is so damn obvious but I don't think it fits into the current agenda of the pharmaceutical companies and others. Surely they are lobbying against it.
It's a huge conflict of interest.
Look at where the following guys went
Eric Cantor - $2.8 million dollar deal his first year out at a Bank.
Trent Lott John Breax - Lobbyists at a Russian bank who are being hammered by US sanctions. Odds are they're making millions.
Jim DeMint - Works at think tank Heritage Foundation for $1.2 million.
This is their motivation. They want the fat checks. They don't want to work for the people of the USA. I'm sure lots of them are qualified for these other jobs btw. What they aren't qualified for though is leading the USA.
It works in reverse too. You get senators who worked for big banks who then get into congress to influence policy for those big banks.
Jon Corzine did a 4 year stint in Congress after working for Goldman Sachs plus another 4 years as Governor. What were his big accomplishments? I'm no expert so this guy might have been a-ok but since when are we going to get anything done in this country if you only elect ex CEO's of banks or lawyers?
Another example is John Yarmuth who joined congress so that he could help his brother's healthcare business and increase his own personal wealth in that business.
Then just look at, arguably, the most powerful leader in Europe. Angela Merkel. She was a published Physicist before becoming a politician. She did research in Quantum Chemistry. No comparison.
I would like to see your idea implemented by people who are not politicians but who have traveled and studied foreign systems. The problem that I see today is that Americans simply don't understand that there are 37 other countries out there with better healthcare systems than them. We should be true innovators, sure, but start with what works from other countries and make something better that would work for us. These simple things like a national computer system for prescription medication and medical records is so damn obvious but I don't think it fits into the current agenda of the pharmaceutical companies and others. Surely they are lobbying against it.