Unreal3 Engine's First Game Demo released

[Unkno]

Approximately 48% of gamers use AMD.

Taken from some hardware survey

 

[secretanchitman]

those pics on the first page...wow, just wow...

i was expecting better, but hey, its a demo, but oddly only for intels w/ HT (dual-cores with HT actually).

whatever. im waiting for the UT2K7 demo next year.

 

[Keysplayr]

Originally posted by: Unkno
Approximately 48% of gamers use AMD.

Taken from some hardware survey

That's terrific, but do you really believe they will release this game to play on Intel only?
Looks to me like they'd be losing 48% of the money they can potentially make no?

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003

Originally posted by: Unkno
Approximately 48% of gamers use AMD.

Taken from some hardware survey

That's terrific, but do you really believe they will release this game to play on Intel only?
Looks to me like they'd be losing 48% of the money they can potentially make no?

the game . . . no . . . unless they want to make it "free" - only packaged with Intel's CPUs as a 'tech demo' . . .

 

[0roo0roo]

atleast for steam heres survey results
http://www.steampowered.com/status/survey.html
probably one of the easier surveys out there since steam autodetects it all

 

[gi0rgi0]

Wonder if UT2k7 will be like UT2k4 where the demo was played more than the actual full retail game. I played that for along time before I bought it for like $10. After playing a little while
on the other maps I sold the game, hehe. Went back to playing just the demo maps which were the best and only maps I would play on. The rest sucked!!!

 

[Schadenfroh]

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
Intel :thumbsdown:

 

[otispunkmeyer]

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

not alot then......its doesnt look that good. NFSMW looks better. so does SCCT

that really does look poor, looks like its based on the same engine as riddick or something

 

[F1shF4t]

Originally posted by: apoppin

Originally posted by: keysplayr2003

Originally posted by: Unkno
Approximately 48% of gamers use AMD.

Taken from some hardware survey

That's terrific, but do you really believe they will release this game to play on Intel only?
Looks to me like they'd be losing 48% of the money they can potentially make no?

the game . . . no . . . unless they want to make it "free" - only packaged with Intel's CPUs as a 'tech demo' . . .

Funny how lots of games have recomended requirements based on intel cpus especially the ones which say only something like 3ghz cpu recomended, LOL i had one game tell me i would have problems running it cause it detected my cpu speed as -1800 mhz.

 

[ZimZum]

Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

not alot then......its doesnt look that good. NFSMW looks better. so does SCCT

that really does look poor, looks like its based on the same engine as riddick or something

Doesn't look good at all. And usually the Devs crank up the visuals in the Demos compared to what the the final build ends up looking like. I remember the early Demos of both D3 and HL2 looked better than the final product.

 

[Drayvn]

Why is the recommended specs a 9800 against a 6200? isnt that like a generation apart?

 

[Cheesetogo]

Originally posted by: Drayvn
Why is the recommended specs a 9800 against a 6200? isnt that like a generation apart?

Yes, but a 9800 will be alot faster.

 

[Unkno]

Originally posted by: ZimZum

Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

not alot then......its doesnt look that good. NFSMW looks better. so does SCCT

that really does look poor, looks like its based on the same engine as riddick or something

Doesn't look good at all. And usually the Devs crank up the visuals in the Demos compared to what the the final build ends up looking like. I remember the early Demos of both D3 and HL2 looked better than the final product.

Almost with every game, the earlier demos would look better than the final product BECAUSE they have to optimize it (to an extent) for the majority of the people who has crappy computers.

 

[hans030390]

What are you talking about. Demos usually look worse than the retail game.

Anyways, I played the robohordes thing...it was lame...and the graphics sucked (ok, the shadows were fine)...but it ran choppy on 800x600...which considering these graphics, it shouldnt.

BTW, this is just an arcade game for the xbox360 that you'll be able to download...i dont think its coming to PC...i dunno, thats what i heard.

 

[a4000tdh]

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

Unreal 3 engine looks like crap..... make some 1920x1080 screenshotz

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: a4000tdh

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

Unreal 3 engine looks like crap..... make some 1920x1080 screenshotz

An Engine doesn't automagically make crap look good.

 

[videogames101]

Someone hack it and make it usable for amd...

 

[mwmorph]

Originally posted by: gi0rgi0
Wonder if UT2k7 will be like UT2k4 where the demo was played more than the actual full retail game. I played that for along time before I bought it for like $10. After playing a little while
on the other maps I sold the game, hehe. Went back to playing just the demo maps which were the best and only maps I would play on. The rest sucked!!!

? Morpheus3(i played almost all my ut original matches on morpheus original.) was the best map evar. fire coming from every direction, you never know where enemies will pop up due to the extreme low gravity.

 

[TSS]

i dont think the UE3 engine looks bad, just this game. the UT2k7 screens definatly looked better...

 

[Drayvn]

Originally posted by: sandorski

Originally posted by: a4000tdh

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Screenshot pics of what you are missing. :roll:

Text

Text

Posted in the other thread too. You really aren't missing much.

Unreal 3 engine looks like crap..... make some 1920x1080 screenshotz

An Engine doesn't automagically make crap look good.

Nice! that made me laugh!

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: biostud
Maybe it's optimised for Intel Extreme Graphics as well.

:thumbsup:

 

[a4000tdh]

there is a game based on U3 engine out but Unreal 3 demo ain't out yet? And why the hell is it only for Intel?

 

[RussianSensation]

I don't see how these specs will make someone upgrade their computer.

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Processor Genuine Intel® Processor (3GHz+) supporting Hyper-Threading Technology

My P4 2.6 is clocked at 3.2ghz and has HT - bought June 2003. It's 2006 in in about 10 days. P4 3.0ghz is pathetic if you ask me. If cpus evolved as fast as before, we'd be at way more than 6.0ghz if speed doubled every 18-24 months (historically). So to me P4 3.0ghz is a joke.

Memory 512 MB RAM (1 GB recommended)

Who doesn't have 1 gigs of ram for gaming? 1 gig costs $100. 2 years ago 2x512mb sticks of 2-3-3-6 quality cost $130

Video NVIDIA® GeForce? 6200 or better
ATI® Radeon? 9800 or better

Ancient technology. For a game that comes out in late 2006 at best we will have G80 and R600 in full force. I want to see 6800Ultra and X850XT as minimum. By then those cards will be well bottom level performance wise.

I think requirements are rather low. Games should push hardware way more so we can actually take advantage of hardware. There has not been 1 game that pushed P4 3.0ghz. Also only recently games like FEAR and COD2 have pushed videocards for FPS market. But 7800 series is already getting replaced by cards that will breeze through these 2 titles in about 2-3 months. Software is about 1.5-2 years behind imo.

 

[nRollo]

Originally posted by: xtknight
The UE3 engine better run on AMDs.

The market for it will be small if it doesn't!

 

[destrekor]

Cliffy B. is no idiot. he wouldn't NOT support AMDs.
i mean, Epic is making a game for the xbox360. Its not even x86 arch! So, how hard would it be to support AMD's? Its not as if they are slower than Intels. We all know about that